The majority of shooting sprees appear to be carried out by people who do not appear to care much about their own life or health. Many also appear to target places because they have some sort of connection to and do not just choose the "easiest target".
So why should guns in schools or other places that are gun free scare possible shooters off?
>They won't scare shooters off, the armed people will just kill the shooters.
Where there any teachers you feared or really hated in school?
If yes, imagine that asshole having access to a gun. Would that make your learning experience better?
Becsuse. They're mentally retarded. If there no security with guns they're more liklry to go there BC. They're DUMB AND COWARDS. even though they're dead when backup arrives. Main points are as follows.
>I can see the word "trained" on that sign
Yea, because you will be able to train a teacher into a part time SWAT-member, tard.
There are many teachers who even suck at teaching and now you want to give them counter-terrism training?
Good luck with that!
>you act like basic gun use is this impossible to learn thing
Taking down an active shooter in a crowded building without causing even more harm is a lot more than just being able to operate a firearm.
There is a reason why there are special police units for that.
an hour a day or less at a local gun range is all thats required over a period of maybe 6 months to produce a functional shooter
they do not all need to be lee harvey oswalds, they just need to be able to hit a target within probably no more than 15 meters, at the very most
most teachers have time for children of their own, or hobbies, or afterschool activities, and yes, they would indeed have time for firearms training if they desired to carry one at their job
>only in america do people think adding guns to a situation makes it safer
Simple solutions for simple people. Whether they work or not.
I'd also say the Trump vote is strong ITT but most here aren't voting age yet.
If you think professional people have an hour a day to spare like its nothing you're delusional beyond belief. We have people whose job consists of handling situations like that, so lets use them.
>people like you never get tired of feeling self-righteous and superior lol, and yet still no one cares what you think
You do, otherwise you wouldn't care to reply.
If they save me from a spree killer, yes. What kind of retarded question is that? Your point is that we should just give up on the idea of protecting children(not to mention the teachers themselves) just because a gun in the hands of someone who's trained to carry it might scare the kids?
Your children must be huge cucks just like you lol
>What if they hit some other students shooting back???
1 or 2 casualties isn't better than an unopposed shooter killing 20+ kids?
>To be honest as los angeles is pretty much 100% gay and liberal
That is San Francisco, if I am not mistaken.
HelLA is full of violent niggers, spics and plastic people.
How dare you insult my grammar, sir! Dual me dual me. 1v1
seeing as i work at a public university and work closely in my job with local high school and other teachers, i can absolutely say that most of these people do indeed have time to spare
whether they would be willing to spend it learning to use a firearm or not is debatable, certainly, but it is not a delusion. teachers value their free time and personal lives as much as anyone, i'll have you know, and it would be more of a personal choice whether to put forth the effort to learn or not
of course, any sensible implication of a "trained and armed" staff scenario would require completion of a certified training regime, and those who did not complete said training regime would undoubtedly not be permitted to carry on campus, but those who might have a desire to learn to shoot would not be unable to do so simply because of their job
neither. school shooters expect to go in and be killed.
just because it's staffed by gun nuts doesn't mean it's any safer. if anything, it's less because some old fuck who wants to reinact the ok corral is in charge of keeping students "safe"
All republicans and conservatives need to be put into camps and processed for orderly disposal.
>>implying teachers earn enough to buy weapons and ammo much less training
>implying that whole rant made any point at all or that anyone in the world who matters debates whether or not america is a radical country
stop talking to yourself when no one is around, it's not healthy, anon
School shootings? No, not really. More than it should, but I can only think of two incidents (sandy hook and columbine) where it was as bad as these threads make it seem.
There have been plenty more where a kid brought a gun to school and only managed to shoot a few people, but those situations will probably keep happening until a huge majority of the guns in this country are destroyed. Which, as just about anyone with a brain could tell you, would be a very, very hard thing to accomplish. The most we could really do is get rid of the legal, registered guns and hope for the best.
>implying they don't
Are you fucking retarded? I could go buy a glock and all the ammo I need for a few hundred bucks. I'm sure I could register it and all that for under a grand
Teachers aren't anywhere close to being that poor
I don't wonder. They're scum and they need to be eliminated.
Put them in camps. gas them. Put limbaughs, becks, hannities heads on spikes and demonstrate the consequences of their fascism. You guys are always revelling in what wins you can get. And you had a big win. But it will seem much smaller when we get our hands on you. You can look smug and self satisfied all you want. Go the route of martin shereki.
But eventually we're going to hunt you down and kill you. You may have more guns. but we have more people.
And eventually, you're all going to die. Horribly.
Then we'll see who's smug when there's a 300 pound genderfluid anarchodyke sitting on your chest demanding you embrace Sister Steinems teachins or perish.
Sorry guys. But you must be quick like teh snaaaaaaaake.
Youre just jelly BC you tried and failed. Not wasted. Taken! From all of you thirsty pricks.. Mmm tastes good. Here have my fav gif.
Can you imagine if faggots in !music got it? I can't imagine teh pain.
Maybe it could, but it would have a lot of negative side effects. I'm in the Midwest and we hunt the shit out of deer, but they're still all over the place causing nasty traffic accidents, fucking up crops, etc.
And that's just deer. I can't imagine what would happen down in the south where warthogs are a much bigger problem or Alaska, where needing to defend yourself against a bull moose or a grizzly bear is a very real possibility for many people.
You could use the argument:"well, you use rifles to hunt those things and handguns are the main problem with shootings like these."
But I would just remind you that they used at least one rifle at columbine. Not to mention how easy it is to take a hacksaw to any shotgun or rifle to make it relatively easy to conceal.
I think we should just have police officers or even veterans stationed at schools. I don't like the idea of any Joe Schmo teacher who can get a carry permit being the one in charge of defending a school full of children. I think kids care much less about the fact that there's a guy with a gun at the door than their yuppie parents do
I can't believe our country is so insane now we can't decide between stricter gun laws and arming public school teachers and training them to fucking kill people
There's a reason this doesn't happen everywhere else, whether gun fags want to admit it or not
>I can't believe our country is so insane now we can't decide between stricter gun laws and arming public school teachers and training them to fucking kill people
>There's a reason this doesn't happen everywhere else, whether gun fags want to admit it or not
Every now and then a guy like this comes along and reminds us that not all Americans are insane.
An armed society is a civil and polite society. If everyone is armed criminals wouldn't have any victims because their prey has the ability to stop them dead in their tracks. It's a tool to equalize the situation and give the victim power over the aggressor. Most people who own guns don't fantasize about killing people, if we did we would have a more massive homicide rate with guns. Over 300 million guns in the US and the homicide rate with guns is less than .0003 % nationally or 8,124 people (based off 12-31-2014 data). What we can infer from this is that there is less than a fraction of a percent of gun owners that are criminal. We don't have a gun problem in this country, but a criminal problem. Stopping regular people from buying guns only has the guns go on the black market, and only criminals and police will have them. Why not allow regular people to exercise their rights fully to protect themselves or to simply have fun?
Since so many /k/ appears to be in here, what caliber bullet is this?
Both signs are retarded gun free zones are retarded either you have the right to bare arms or not.
He the one that would have sex with his human property?
>There is a reason why there are special police units for that.
And when seconds count they're only minutes away.
That quote is complete bullshit. Aside from that I have no idea who that guy is.
Schools already do lockdown drills. Literally camp out with a gun pointed at the door. Only faggots try to Rambo someone invading a place when they can just ambush them when they kick the door.
You sssss summoned meeee? What donyoiu wishhhh tonknow, mortal man?
>i hope this is a joke other wise your stupidity alone will end humanity
Why because people around the world give a shit about your celebrities, politicians or whatever that fag was?
Like you could tell me who Clausewitz was.
"There is no way of protecting oneself from someone who cares not if he lives or dies, but such men are so rare that a Prince should not concern himself with worrying about it." -N. Macchiavelli
>are you willing to die attempting to take them?
Bring it fatty!
This permit makes it legal to carry your arms on all US soil.
That doesn't make any fucking sense. What if the majority of people wants the right to bear arms taken away? Should the government be stopped from implementing the will of the people?
I highly doubt that that nigger owner even said that.
>This permit makes it legal to carry your arms on all US soil.
Actually it doesn't. Just because you have the right to own something doesn't mean you can bring it wherever you want.
Rights are something you cant take away no sign or o you cant bring that here takes your right to it away. Only you have the choice of for fitting your rights.
nope. the second has already been infringed.
when written, citizens and the us government had the exact same weapons.
now, citizens can only own weapons from a list approved by the us gov't.
Do you have any idea how much debt you are in straight out of college? Teachers make more or less the same as mid level factory jobs, and they have $30,000+ debt hanging over their heads.
Not really you see sellers of said weapons have decided to not sell them to people unless they have an agreed apon credential any retailer has the right to refuse service.