There is nothing wrong with Male Circumcision
Prove me wrong (Pro-tip: you can't)
You're not wrong. 2 of my three kids are circumcised. Mom wouldn't let me circumcise the last one. Guess I'm beta. His dick is stinky af. and he is under 4yo. Plus there is this too.
Idk. Cutfag here. On one hand, it sounds a little more convenient for washing, but I've never experienced the alternative, so my frame of reference isn't exactly valid. I kind of wish I could feel what it's like to cum with that extra part of my penis still there. Damn shame I never got the opportunity, but meh, it's not the end of the world.
alright so... your assertion is a simple one:
"There is nothing wrong with Male Circumcision"
And you claim that I cannot prove you wrong.
What does it take to prove you wrong? Providing an example of a thing that is "wrong" with Male Circumcision.
Example 1: Jews invented circumcision.
That would be elective mutilation though. Phimosis is a good reason for circumcision, but isn't detectable before much later in life. Putting a baby through intense pain and a risk of infection due to wearing diapers, for aesthetic reasons is just stupid.
Excuse me, how is pointing out the exclusionary cultural norms of religious people edgy?
Are you denying that Jews have worked together throughout history to create monopolies and drive their competitors out of business?
Are you denying that Muslims kill people just for not being Muslim?
Are you denying whatever the f*ck Christians have done that nobody seems to care about since it holds global plurality?
Smegma can be washed away and ease of access is already there if the dick doesn't have phimosis.
Are you gonna cut off your ass or armpits for being smelly, or do you wash them like a regular person.
The most common reason I've met for infant circumcision is "I just want him to look like me/his father". That sounds rather aesthetic to me.
this board is for adults only
See, the ass provides cushioning when sitting. The foreskin does nothing.
You can grab onto your dick and slide your hand up and down you fucking mongoloid
The foreskin protects the glans from dirt and friction, maintaining a sensitive sexual organ.
It also functions as a natural lube trap, that stops the wetness from leaving the vagina and can give the woman a better sexual experience.
These are just a few of the functions, you can go google the rest.
English isn't my first language and it's the middle of the night here, sue me.
It keeps the natural female lubrication inside of the vagina, avoiding excessive friction.
See there, it's fixed, are you gonna engage with my argument or will you keep correcting my writing?
Actually both sides of the argument bring up this topic. The insecure cutfags who are fishing for confirmation of their bias and overzealous uncutfags who act like all circumcision is the breakfast of the devil. My only point of contention with circumcision is doing it to babies who have no way of consenting. If you needed to be old enough to consent, to get this elective surgery, most of the problems in this issue would go away.
Except for the dwindling supply of stem cells for the make up industry I gather.
Growing up in a large multicultural city I would say in my experience, in high school especially the cut fags always brought up the subject constantly and randomly. They would always try and bring up how gross being uncut is as if they were trying to convince themselves of something. If I lost part of my dick I'd be insecure about it too.
typical uncut Yuropoor benis
It's a coping mechanism, not entirely in their control either. Somewhat along the lines of "If my parents claim to love me, what they did to me can't be mutilation. There must be something wrong with foreskins".
It's basically a way to deal with the residual trauma of being born and suddenly being in huge amounts of pain just afterwards. Their first interaction with the world is finding out that it is a painful, horrible place. Then imagine being told you went through that pain for your own benefit years later.
nope, I'm a happy and healthy cut american.
You don't understand... Instead of your hand rubbing the skin, and your hand moving back and forth on the skin, your hand stays in contact with the same skin, and the skin itself glides back and forth over your penis and glans.
that is not my penis sir. That is the penis of an uncut Yuropoor. This is also not my penis, just another illustration of why getting cut is important
It is filled with about 20k nerve endings which obviously influence sensation, plus it acts as a protective sheath that keeps the glans (dickhead) from getting calloused and desensitised itself
if people want to do it, fine, but there is no real justification to do it to an infant or child, it should be left up to the individual to choose once they are of sound mind according to society ala legal age to sign contracts and whatnot
don't let women dictate your cock you beta faggots
Circumcision is fucking dumb. You're just getting rid of nerve endings, and i'm guessing fapping without lube just isn't possible. If you know how to fucking wash you won't catch anything bad.
I'm cut and it's real difficult for me to ejaculate by getting a blowjob, also the tip of my cock is rubbing around inside my underwear and unless I get a specific kind it irritates my cock.
Being cut sucks ass and it wasn't even my choice.
Sure I don't have to clean the smegma from my cock, but that's where the pros end.