>>696518510 Whoever made this comic doesn't understand how they decide who's on the money. In order to be on U.S. currency, the government looks at presidents that have done great things for the country. >Washington led the country in its infancy >Jefferson was one of the authors of the Declaration of Independence >Lincoln ended slavery and prevented the U.S. from splitting >Hamilton was first Secretary of Treasury, and was damn good at his job >Jackson dismantled the 2nd U.S. bank and payed off THE ENTIRE NATIONAL DEBT >Grant was a Civil War general who later became president >Franklin was a badass inventor
So, in the author's comic, Trump did something amazing enough to warrant him replacing Washington on the $1 bill. The author is definitely a libtard.
>>696519263 I get that its supposed to be a jab at Trump for his "controversial" policies, but its so obvious that the author is a globalist, open-all-the-borders type that he implied the president they don't like would put the country in an apocalyptic state. I'm not saying Trump is an all-around great choice (I'd rather have Gary Johnson sans-TPP), but the comic's bias is astounding.
>>696519911 You only stated how trumo is dumb. Please say how hilary has fucked up. Ill give you a hint, its WAY more then trump has ever done. Now while i go eat this cheeseburger you have fun with your terrorist infested country faggot
i think donald trump represents what most people in the german media would see as a (harsh) stereotype of the america image. loud and hard to take serious his excessive proposals.
clinton seems like the brand of presidents we know. that makes ger less weird. and her being a social democrat (which is what people on the rest of the planet would call the nutty kind of your liberals) is a view germans are used to. i have no doubt hilary clinton fit's european standard of politicians... but if you ask for representing the image of the US as a guiding light for the free world, both candidates stink. clinton in being the "teacher's pet" of the dnc party machine and trump for being a thug who is best not be believed much.
god damn it. just vote for neither already. maybe the parties will present you agreeable candidates next time
>>696519911 funny. europe has border walls and prevents muslims from immigrating.
If I went to a european country that bordered a muslim country and said that it was racist to stop people from walking in illegally would you take it seriously? would you fire all the border guards and take down the razor fences?
Am a Irishfag and to me, Americans seem like fucking idiots. Though I'm sure there are plenty of smart Americans, the majority of them act plain stupid. It's cringe worthy, both Hillary and Trump represent their country brilliantly.
>>696519694 No, Jackson is reviled by anyone studying history. You're basically bragging about someone who killed a social service based on a political vendetta. And you're also pushing the fallacy that having a balanced budget is good thing. Shit costs money, the country takes on debt. What are taxes? inb4 taxes are theft
>>696517661 Trump is the very antithesis of where America would be in ten years, Clinton represents the corrupt political class. Both do not represent America, but Trump is a necessity to prevent worse things from happening. He's the force that'll make the pendulum start swinging back and that's desperately needed.
>>696517661 Hey germanfag here. i really hope for you that trump win's. We in germany have a woman in charge and everything is goin to shit. Our Facebook is now monitored by a foundation that is lead by a former Stasi and thinks #gamergate is/was a criminal organisation. There is no free speach in germany anymore you get charged to pay money just for posting "merkel should be stoned" on facebook if you wanna see for yourself just google "amadeu antinio stiftung"
Eurofag here. Trump is the most representative here. He look dumb, quite retarded in fact. Doesn't understand foreign policies and actually doesn't give a fuck about his own peoples. He's definitely the archetype of the ''proud and dumb'' american that the whole world see. And that actually is SAD SAD SAD SAD.
>>696520420 There are obvious exceptions to the rule, excuse me for not re-reading each word. Hamilton and Franklin weren't presidents, but were important in the development and survival of the US. Harriet did many good things, but I can't decide for sure if forcing Jackson to the back of the dollar (funny how times change) is proper.
>>696521126 >Jackson is reviled by anyone studying history Wrong. Jackson is a polarizing figure, who's infamous nowadays for the Trail of Tears, but has been the only one to pay off our debt.
>>696521984 Nope, just fucking despise the US. I lived there for 2 years and it's full of complete and utter idiots, I mean proper uneducated, blindly patriotic fat retards. Also it's a shithole, regarding infrastructure and standard of living. Some parts are like a third world country
>>696522270 >Word Origin and History for racist Expand 1932 as a noun, 1938 as an adjective, from race (n.2); racism is first attested 1936 (from French racisme, 1935), originally in the context of Nazi theories. But they replaced earlier words, racialism (1871) and racialist (1917), both often used early 20c. in a British or South African context. In the U.S., race hatred, race prejudice had been used, and, especially in 19c. political contexts, negrophobia.
Took me longer to solve the captcha than prove you wrong.
>>696522352 Google it fuckwad. The national debt is approximately $22 trillion as of 2 months ago. Your precious democrats blow more money than any other political party. Obama and his family alone have spent millions on their damn vacations.
>>696522518 Where did yoh live lol Ive lived in 4 countries, the US the longest and its not bad. I even got paid to not have a job and my kid had free food for 2 years. Please tell me how thats a third world country. No job. Free money. Free food.... America.
>>696522127 https://us-presidents.insidegov.com/q/31/9699/What-were-President-Andrew-Jackson-s-accomplishments >First and only president to pay off the entire national debt fact-check every once in a while, kid >XDXD does mom know you're on this edgy hacker site?
>>696522207 >quotes around random words to sound more le witty >bringing up Ron Paul for no reason as some dumb checkmate moment I didn't expect to cringe this hard.
>>696522588 You dont say when and by who the term/ word racist was invented just the origin word.
"Word Origin and History for racist Expand 1932 as a noun, 1938 as an adjective, from race (n.2); racism is first attested 1936 (from French racisme, 1935), originally in the context of Nazi theories. But they replaced earlier words, racialism (1871) and racialist (1917), both often used early 20c. in a British or South African context. In the U.S., race hatred, race prejudice had been used, and, especially in 19c. political contexts, negrophobia.
Took me longer to solve the captcha than prove you wrong."
do you think it does matter anything in anyway who you vote? our ridiculous pseudo-democratic system don't gives a president the competences to do aynthing against the real rulers. who are allways the ones with the money. i don't talk about dollar or euro millionairs... i talk about people who have so much damn real "money" that dollars and euros can't do anything.
as long as you think about "hillary or donnald" you don't think about "capitalism or bust"
>>696523352 If it was invented in 1927, it's origin wouldn't be in 1932, now would it? And if it was by Trotsky, it's first attestation would be in his work, again in 1927, not in 1936. For that matter, It wouldn't be English, since Trotsky didn't speak English and was fluent only in Russian and his native dialect (Suzurgh? Something like that).
try looking at the United States Budget. Bill Clinton took the US budget from 1.5 to 1.8T in his eight years in power.
Then came little bush and his war, from 1.8T to 4.2T. The worst eight years of US budget expansion in the history of the US.
The 2015 budget of 3.9T is absolutely mindblowing. No republican president would have been able to do much better than Obama (I know, you need to thank the republican congress/senate for a lot of that, but don't forget little bush had both for most of his tenure)
>>696522770 Obama started with a 1.4 Trillion dollar deficit and it's now 438 billion. He also reduced the size of the goverment and never raised taxes. Bill and Obama have both reduced the deficit. Reagan and the 2 Bushs left office with it higher then the started. Republicans put us in more debt then democratics and Hillary is right the economy dose better under Democrats.
>>696526108 I've never called it that, honest. But since you bring it up, it is technically a mental illness. From an evolutionary standpoint it's a huge disadvantage. Being gay is as well, and I have a lot of gay friends. Gay animals also have a mental illness.
>>696517661 Clinton represents progressive America, OP. The DNC adopted a hella-progressive agenda last night with public option for health care, no TPP, a plan for taking down the biggest banks on Wall Street.
Trump is just a selfish chump who wants to cause turmoil. He doesn't have any plan other other than to build a Wall and indict Clinton.
but obviously you're proving my point that you hate "political correctness" because you feel you have the right to hate people without consequence. You're the problem, not people trying to change society.
>>696526259 Dude, can't you see that you are the one who has the agenda? You are protecting an ideology which goes against all western liberal values, and you probably have the gull to call yourself a liberal. Islam is damaging to society, the sooner it is gone the better. I'm not going to protect it because of current trends like you are. This whole division of the left that happened recently revealed who the real liberals were all alone, and who the posers were who would go against liberalism in the name of staying trendy. Liberals are suppose to be rational people.
>>696526755 Has it ever occurred to you that the Hillary hate being spun is because the right-wing considers her a threat to their conservative ideology, and that's why she's always involved in "scandals?"
>>696526202 you can't stop it all. there are whatsoever topics that are favoured by both parties like agricultural subsidies especially sugar production. those don't stop even with presidents and congress disagreeing on media focussed stuff
>>696525912 >he can only defend his authoritarian stance with meme language and claims of "it just won't work" What does a population of 400 million have to relate with granting more freedom to the average person? Are you saying that there'd be an uneven shift of power because there's a lot of people who are getting these new freedoms? What's your fucking point besides slandering?
>>696526725 I don't hate trans people or gays, I had a gay friend over at may place for the last two days, we're extremely close, he even talks to me openly about his gay relationships like another dude would about a straight relationship. I'm the real fucking deal man, and you can't handle it. You can't stand someone who doesn't see things as black and white. Someone who doesn't care about others opinions, someone who doesn't feel compelled to virtue signal to fit in. I'm a classical liberal, you're a knockoff, an impostor.
>>696517661 Germanfag here. Trump. No question. We've tried a woman for a leader over here and it has been a complete failure. You could learn from your failure. But then, you are Ameritards and enjoy electing corporate shills who only fuck you and your children for generations to come.
I also could not fathom how Clinton would ever get elected anywhere in any civilized nation in the world outside of the U.S. She would have gone to prison long ago here. We don't tolerate that kind of nonsense and it speaks volumes to how much you Amerifags are cucks that you'd actually even let her get a chance to be your President after all she has done.
FYI, she is pretty much despised by most of the rest of the world. It would be an unwise choice for this reason alone.
Trump seems to be an outsider who has taken no money from your corporations or establishment. That's rare and most nations beg for someone independent like that if for nothing else than to shake up the politics and keep the rest of the politicians honest. You'll never get that with Clinton as she is a career politician and beholden to many masters.
>>696527825 Religions are protected up until the point that they infringe on others, islam is built to infringe from the top down, and it was very carefully structured to endure anything, and to deceive outsiders. All you have to do is take a little time and use the power of internet which is under your fingertips right now and read the doctrine. If that is too hard for you, then learn key points, learn what abrogation in islam is for example.
>>696527346 >he thinks libertarianism is "taxation is theft: the political stance" While I'd like some taxes cut, those services and safety nets are still ultimately needed. I'm saying the government needs FAR less political power, and a tad less economic power.
>>696527394 When was I lying about the current national debt mate, I said that during Jackson's term, he paid off the debts at the time. You were saying previously that other presidents had paid off national debt, until I cited my source. Why the argument change? Do you have a hate-boner for Jackson?
Her entire life has been her lusting after power. She slut-shamed the women Bill seduced AND over-looked his sexually assaulting women because she knew that if she left him, she'd have no power. Yet, she calls herself a feminist.
She's from Illinois, lived in Arkansas, but went to NY so she could get elected to the Senate.
She's also beholden to most big businesses as well as many, many nations thanks to their "contributions" to her fund. And, a lot of those nations have horrible human rights histories and treat their women horrifically. And, again, she calls herself a feminist.
Trump is a douchebag for sure, but she's a scumbag who will stop at nothing for power.
>>696528510 You have no arguments, none, zip, nada. I gave you a chance, you have nothing of value to add to this discussion. I win, you lose. Simple as that. Beating around the bush may make you feel smart, but I assure you that you are anything but.
>>696528392 >I said that during Jackson's term, he paid off the debts at the time.
Why do you keep posting this like it's some badge of honor?
So the fuck what. That means under Jackson he ran a lean machine with little or no government intervention at a time private industry and individuals were enslaving human beings and giving the wealthiest an advantage we don't even see today.
Spending arguments are stupid. Instead tell me why we shouldn't spend revenues to "promote the general welfare?"
>>696519911 eurofag here >Shillary here FYI, moron, nobody in Europe refers to themselves as being from "Europe". Would you refer to yourself as a "North American"? Also, few of us give a crap or know much at all about your election, or an opinion, let alone such a strong and one-sided opinion as you clearly do. Last, nations on the continent of Europe currently have any sentiment toward "muslims" other than something ranging from stong disdain to outright hatred. Perhaps in your sheltered U.S. you haven't seen our regular bombings or how whole chunks of our nations have been taken over with squatters. No one in Europe, save for muslims, who don't come here, would ever do anything but cheer getting rid of muslims, yet you state, "Trump . . . and preventing muslims from immigrating make any sense whatsoever is a drooling moron"
>>696528264 You imply that's a bad argument to prove you're not a xenophobe, but you should realize it's actually the best argument. Why would a xenophobe/racist/whatever hang out with the people he hates? I never got the logic behind this "counter argument".
>>696528940 >Perhaps in your sheltered U.S. you haven't seen our regular bombings
lol you are such a faggot.
You bitch about muslims being dangerous but havent talken a walk through a ghetto in teh US. Over here, shits more dangerous than any tea drinking faggot town you have in europe and we dont even have muslims
Our cops shoot more of our own than muslims shoot you or bomb you
We are a lot of things, sheltered is not one of them.
There is no such thing as "living wages." Everyone has different needs and wants and talents. There is no way to quantify what a "living wage" is, since no two people are the same and are in the same situation.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.