Post your manliest pictures /b/
Yes. that is. in fact. a mortar.
>just in case you thought it was the world's most dangerous dildo.
>I'm not a faggot anymore, DAD!
Speaking up against inequality and sexism is legitimately brave, although it shouldn't have to be.
>Bombing someone from far away is what a pussy does, not a man.
Unless its a man that does it, and its for the right reasons, like destroying violent retards - then it's beyond manly.
God you faggots are so cancerous
It's just not.
Real men would look into the eyes of the men they kill. They put themselves in actual danger. They wouldn't do it from a position where they're perfectly safe bombing away.
Not manly at all.
I don't believe in gender inequality. My wife is the highest paid tech at her shop. She is also the most qualified with the most ASE certificates (6). So fuck you cuck
>the social construct of 'manliness'
It depicts the actual construct of manliness. Any notion of equality is a socialist construct and has no bearing on reality.
The world needs manly men to do manly things that no one else has the guts to do.
That's great, honestly it is and I say that genuinely.
But are you willing to confront your gender biases? Are you willing to change your behavior so that you don't treat men and women differently? Or are you not brave enough to do that.
Using superior technology and tactics to defeat an opponent? That's what separates us from animals. Nothing more manly than defeating your enemies without even breaking a sweat.
You're implying that social constructs don't exist, which is not true. Something can be an 'actual' construct and a social construct.. I mean look at the very real and perceived value of a paper dollar bill.
Manliness is a social construct that is perpetuated in this society and in this thread, and it would be brave to question how we see gender roles. Are you brave enough to do it?
>But are you willing to confront your gender biases? Are you willing to change your behavior so that you don't treat men and women differently? Or are you not brave enough to do that.
not taking your guilt trip bullshit. You're no better than the religiously indoctrinated
Spoken like a true moron. How do you propose removal of suffering? Life contains hardships, and the egalitarian idea is to share these hardships, so no one person lives a blissful happy life whilst others suffer. 99% of people would suffer less but of course the suffering is shared amongst us
You are completly right. THIS used to be "double as manly". Now it's considered faggotry/feminin
Women are too weak to be considered a genuine threat most of the time. They're too weak to genuinely be considered as protection as well. It's why we don't have SEALS that are women.
I treat men and women differently because they are different. Fact of life. You can whine and wring your hands in your gender studies classes, but biology will always win out.
That's a strawman argument and a half. I'm not suggesting that we all live blissful lives with no hardship, and frankly I'm insulted that you'd imply that I am. All I'm saying is a quality, happy, dignified life should be attainable by all.
nice photoshop work on the grass.
But do you realize that a lot of why you treat women differently are because of social constructs that have more to do with how society has evolved over the years than directly to do with biology?
Quite often these differences end up benefiting men, funny how that works eh?
Lol. Keep thinking this if you wan't. It's just not true.
I'm not saying that it isn't smart, or beneficial, of course it is. But it's just wrong to think that that automatically makes it more manly.
There is a reason that all our typical examples of manliness come from antiquity. Think of Hercules, or the Spartans, or Gladiators, or Roman Legionnaires. They will always be considered more manly then some dude shelling an enemy from miles away with a motor - and rightfully so.
Go out on the street and ask people who they think were the most manly warriors, nobody is going to even mention modern wars, and if they do, it sure as hell isn't going to be the artillery teams.
>treat women differently are because of social constructs
Just saying it's a social construct does not make it a social construct, especially when their are mental and physical differences between men and women.
Men are stronger, smarter and don't mind doing the things that make you squeamish or cry and shake.
This argument is generally used to benefit straight white males.
The common definition of "work" if not one that is typically very inclusive, and is used to disparage the struggles of inner city blacks who may not be presented with the opportunities, or even the knowledge to know what productive "work" is.
I get it, you're a year into your humanities degree and you think the world can be improved. If women are raised up, then men have to fall, if racial inequality is removed then white people have to lose out. I'm an egalitarian, but to say the world will be better for everyone is just retarded
>But it's just wrong to think that that automatically makes it more manly.
One of the greatest qualities of a manly man is his great intellect.
Pussies like Palestinian muslims use their own children as human shields and fight in the street.
I'm with this guy.
I'd much rather be shelling people from far away, but that's because it's more effective, and I'm a pussy.
It's a joke to think its somehow more manly, though.
Pain and suffering is what makes you grow up as a person, it toughens you up and allows you to better take care of your loved ones. Eliminating it is a stupid and naive idea and shows how little foresight and experience you have as a human being
Right but so much of the way we are treated has nothing to do with the biological differences between men and women.
For instance: Why are women expected to wear makeup? This is not a reasonable expectation and leads to thousands of hours of wasted time in a woman's life living up to the expectation of men. it's a social construct and it's sexist.
step aside, ladies, original gangster stepping through
>This argument is generally used to benefit straight white males.
Yes, and it benefits black men, white women, black women as well. It benefits Hispanics and well - Asians work hard and receive the benefits regularly.
They don't bitch and whine one minute, and proclaim how proud they are in the streets either.
They're OK with hard working and humble, unlike so many bitchy idiots.
Again, this is a strawman argument as I'm not suggesting that all pain and suffering be eliminated. That's a ridiculous notion and I'm insulted that you'd imply that I'm trying to push it.
You're basing your argument on the premise that sexism is inherently bad. There is a great logic to patriarchy, women are physically weaker and for a week a month (and the last several years of their life) they are irrational and unprofessional
I didn't say that. I just said that an egalitarian society would remove the pain and suffering caused by not having one. That's a tautological fact.
People ITT really love putting words in my mouth.
>What's your point? Or are you implying that none of the Classical civilizations had any intellect, or didn't apply it when fighting?
The ones with the highest intellect used all the tech he had to win. You're really losing this debate new friend.
Sexism is inherently bad because it takes us farther away from an egalitarian society. Something that is completely within our grasp as intelligent, evolved, social creatures.
You're implying that pain is caused by inequality, it isn't
It's just distributed along unequal lines. You sound like an idiot
P.s. Strawman argument is a meaningless term that makes you look like a massive fucking tool
That's because straight white males traditionally had a superior work ethic. I know well-off people of most races, and you know what they had in common? They worked hard. Never met a rich black guy who was successful because of welfare, but I do have a black business partner who busts ass.
>Sexism is inherently bad because i
Sexism has protected women, so it's not that bad really. Sexism makes us beat the shit out of rapists and men that would easily subjugate women and bitches.
Yeah I mean, some pain is caused by inequality. Like, i dunno, slavery?
Strawman argument is a logical argumentative concept where the opposing side argues against a point you've never made. Which you're doing. Every. single. time.
I didn't claim an egalitarian society would remove all pain. I didn't ever even claim that all pain should be removed. You keep getting my argument wrong and arguing against something else-- which is a strawman argument.
The United States has the highest number of black millionaires, the highest number of women millionaires.
It is truly a place where anyone can achieve their dreams if they're willing to do the work.
Bitching will only achieve you notoriety as of lately with the surge of socialism and communism here.
It's true that it's optimistic, it's absolutely true. But the more people that work towards an egalitarian society the closer we'll get to it.
Because it is a social construct, the only thing that needs to change is society.
I don't think you understand my point.
I'm not saying that people shouldn't use their technological advantage.
I'm saying that the classical example I mentioned, who all did make use of their technological advantage (minus Hercules, or course) will always be thought of as more manly then their modern equivalents. And this is in part do to the fact that certain technological advantages require no bravery.
For example, nobody thinks some drone operator sitting halfway across the planet is more manly than a Gladiator. They're both using their equipment to their fullest, as they should, but if you think they are going to be consider equally manly, you're just wrong.
This pic is interesting because in Episode 8 Finn's love interest (who is introduced at the beginning of the film) is revealed at the end to be working for Phasma and turns on him!
Also, Rey is Anakin Skywalker reincarnated hence the reason she is so strong with the force. Luke will find this out (by communing with past jedi) and reveal it to Rey
Rey is angry because she thinks Luke killed her parents. He then tells her "No, you are my father"
Just like episode 5 kinda! Spoiler alert!
This is what the feminists will be arguing about when the jihadists storm in with Kalashnikovs - like WHY we don't find Katelyn Jenner sexy and why we must be bigots if we don't... LOL
>Because it is a social construct, the only thing that needs to change is society.
Just repeating it doesn't make it so you moron. It's like "black lives matter" fuckheads. It doesn't have weight until the facts and evidence make it matter and have value.
Until then, we just cringe if bLM comes town and listen to them whine over nothing.
>For example, nobody thinks some drone operator sitting halfway across the planet is more manly than a Gladiator.
A drone operator can kill more indoctrinated islamic bots than a gladiator, so yes, he's quite a bit more manly than a fucking gladiator.
is this from Battle of Crete?
cause if it is, you see those are about to be fucking massacred by my fellow cretans using
axes, pickaxes, pitchforks and rocks.
We had been ordered to surrender all our weapons after WWI and latest Greek Turkish war of 1922.
Never again will cretans do that.
It doesn't matter your struggles as a human being as long as your political affiliation is right.
My sides are in orbit.
This is why feminists abandoned so many muslims that are telling the truth about Islam.
Argentino, justiciero. this men kill all niggers criminals in Argentina! :alaba:
Every other successful,living species has gender roles. They are essential to success of species.
Well okay, then. If you think manliness just equals number of people killed, then there is no real point having this conversation.
2,000 years from now nobody will ever remember the fact that drone operator #98473 sitting in rural Iowa blew up 40 people with his remote control airplane.
Yet we all still worship the heroic an manly exploits of the Greeks and the Romans.
>Implying there is anything manly about a jihadists.
Jihadists are manly because they bag half their population and beat them or kill them when they try and escape.
Jihadists are manly because they hug LGBT persons before throwing them from the tops of buildings, and throw acid in the faces of girls for the crime of learning to read.
First let me know what male favoritism cause by "social constructs" that you are referring to so I can make you feel like an idiot.
But to get started - male and female brains begin to differ in the whomb, and those differences get exasperated as we age.
We are sexually dimorphic. Our males are larger and physically more powerful. Our women get pregnant and have biologically developed since before we were apes to be better caretakers.
>Well okay, then. If you think manliness just equals number of people killed, then there is no real point having this conversation.
Well okay, then. If you think manliness just equals number of violent, unreasonable people eliminated then there is no real point having this conversation.
fixed that for you.
"Manliness" is old fashioned.
Real men don't have to prove their value by doing pointlessly dangerous or aggressive shit. Real men and real women are just real people, and real people respect each other as equals.
Which is exactly why I think the Classical warriors will always be thought of as more manly than the modern ones.
Bombing in WWI / WWII is surely more manly than being a modern drone operator, but it isn't more manly than being a Spartan or a Roman Legionnaire.
There is no comparison of a US serviceman that has put his name on the blank check who's price may include his own life to protect his friends and his way of life.
Jihadists use their own children as human shields and generally never do anything heroic or manly.
I guess that fucking feminist dropped out when all his or her stupid arguments fell apart before everyone.
el racismo es al bueno! donde viste en toda la fauna animal a alguna manada dejar entrar a otra raza entre ellos??? eso es estúpido!! cada raza debe vivir entre los de su misma raza!! hacer lo contrario o procrear en una relación interracial es algo demoníaco! algo asqueroso abominable!!! nadie hace eso excepto los estúpidos cabezas lavados influenciados por ls judíos!! cada quien debe de quedarse a vivir en la tierra donde nació! así va evolucionando su raza y no permitir que otra raza se meta en su territorio! esto es muy importante!!
soy Argentino y les digo por experiencia. en Argentina no habían estas cantidades de robos y asesinatos (2000 asesinatos por año) en buenos aires en la zona y alrededores donde los inmigrantes paraguayos inmigraron desde que abrieron mas las puertas hace 10 años.
Voten por Donald Trump! no dejen que los extranjeros inmigrantes los dominen! sean racistas! no es malo! "tu país tus reglas!!"
si las grandes empresas y los medios de noticias no quieren y hablan mal de Trump. es porque es muy bueno para el verdadero ciudadano estadounidense.
>"Manliness" is old fashioned.
Who is going to stop the Jihadists from raping you? You or someone like you?
My fucking sides.
It has nothing to do with treating people with dignity.
>The Crusaders. And they were a hell of a lot more manly then some modern drone operator.
Would they have used swords when they could have used drones? They were manly because they were intelligent and idealistic and believed Islam is cancer.
.And how many drone operators sitting in an office in some rural midwestern state are putting their lives at risk?
If you're a drone pilot, we don't need you to put your life at risk to accomplish the mission. We need hellfire missiles fired at fundamentalists.
We can beat them in every single arena.
But, if the drone pilot is a father or an uncle or a step father, why should he risk his life when he can pilot a drone because of his superior manly intellect?
>Self defense may be necessary but glorifying it is senseless.
Defense of the weak is a good deed that should be recognized, if not glorified.
Only the strong and brave will defend the weak.
Some of the weak will whine why don't they get the same paycheck as those that protect them.
>"Manliness" is old fashioned.
>Real men don't have to prove their value by doing pointlessly dangerous or aggressive shit. Real men and real women are just real people, and real people respect each other as equals.
Respect is earned through action. It is not automatic.
Virtue can be repressented in art.
Art can take the form of an image.
This is an image board.
Hence, by a logical and quite simple linear process, we can see that you are an unthinking propaganda victim, a fool, and a general nuisance to the creation of a good thread.
what do you wear under your kilt?-"on a good day lip shtic"
Allen Turing was a manly man. He was gay, but was still a manly man.
He didn't bitch about who was getting to do what or how much he was getting paid.
He was too busy being focused on solving problems.
It was stupid religious society that fucked up when they condemned him for being gay.
>By eliminating the pain and suffering caused by an unequal society.
All people are not equal,
and any effort to "equalize" them by force will have disastrous results as it does in every other country that communism does this.
What is the good of voting for someone based upon a characteristic they have no control over?
What is admirable about that? Only racists and bigots do that.
Why be proud of characteristics you have no control over?
Why vote for someone based upon things that person has no control over?
Why not vote for the person that has the highest qualities you're looking for.