Would you date a girl as smart as you or even smarter? I never

I wouldn't ever date a girl I cant manipulate

I took an IQ test and scored a 125. then I learned how its really stupid that pattern recognition is more important to your rated intelligence then general knowledge and problem solving skills.

>>657938459
IQ 154 reporting in
I woud bu I have only met one or two so far

>>657938459
>implying girls can think like normal humans

>>657938677
This is beta as fuck.

>>657938958
Sorry, I meant 15.4

>>657938459
Girl with iq over 150 won't date edgelord. Girls with iq under 150 neither so at least you don't have to make that difficult choice

>>657938459
Already am, it's such a fucking relief not to feel like I have to dumb everything down, or that some subjects are not deemed worthy of discussion

>>657939073
sorry, meant 1.54

>girl
>smart
Choose one

Anyway a smart girl wont fall for my bullshit

I would only date a girl that was on par with me intellectually. I can't stand talking about stupid shit.

IQ 148 here. Found 1 girl smarter than me and we lived together for a couple years. She worked as a biogeneticist and we got along pretty well. Great conversations. Didn't work out though in the long term. She wanted kids, I don't.

>>657939080
I am a blue eyed, blonde 6'1 athletic white guy. No glasses or neckbeard. My last gf was a 9/10 model.

>>657938459
IQ 164 reporting in
Never met one so far

My iq: 163
My girlfriends iq: 148
I would date a girl smarter than me
>>657939017
Agreed

>>657939215
>She wanted kids, I don't.
Her IQ must be 90 or less.

>>657938459
I'd like to. But how would you define smarter? Like a GF who knows everything better than you, or a GF who is better at solving logical problems, or a GF who has a better memory, or just a GF with a higher IQ score than you, which doesn't necessarily have to mean anything in daily situations.

>>657938677
And i wouldn't ever date a girl i can't fucking respect when she opens her mouth.

Once met a girl who thought continental drift was the name of a wrestler, never a-fucking-gain.

I couldn't stand dating someone who was dumber than me.

File: shin_chan_by_troglod.jpg (16KB, 300x374px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x374px

>>657938459
My partner and I are both engineers in the same discipline (materials science) with slightly different specializations. I enjoy that we are both good at different things and our intellectual strengths complement one another. I've dated guys smarter than me and I've dated guys dumber than me.

To be honest, I think what matters most is comparable work ethic and drive. You don't want someone who you think drags you down, and you don't want someone who indirectly pressures you into pushing yourself so hard you can't enjoy life.

Also why the focus on IQs???

>>657939353
IQ, are you even /b/?

>>657939383
This

Dumb girls are insufferable.

>>657939016
Look up normal you fucktard how can you describe the behaviour of 50%of your sample as deviating from the norm?>>657939422

ya'll think too much, unless you're getting into the same career field too they're going to have experiences that you don't have regardless of how smart you are. sure you're great at being an engineer or what ever all of 4chan is but i bet they can bag my groceries better or bake me a better cake haha

everyone is smart in their own way, but if you judge a fish on it's ability to climb a tree he's going to fail

>>657939329
>Wanting kids = low IQ.

I'm sure you're right! Propagation is so stupid..

Yes, I would. Too bad smart girls aren't attracted to me. I guess being a junkie puts people off...

>>657939498
2015 still rating iq tests as a measure of intelligence

>>657938459
Faggot

IQ 204 here, the thought of sticking my phallus into a woman never comes to mind but in any case I froze sperm to carry on a legacy

>>657939498
What?

How much you worry about a girls IQ proves how little all you faggots interact with them.

>>657939648
Yes, it is.

>>657939492
Homosexual nonsense. IQ is everything.

>>657939261
154 guy here
Pretty hard to find someone smarter

>>657939124
Well that would make life easier and I would not be so picky with girls
>hurr durr no bre4thing u stupid
I feel like that is proven wrong everyday

>>657939353
>>657939492
Because they don't have any achievements other than an IQ score.

I wonder how many men there are who think they are smarter than their gf but acutally are not

>>657939744
Who the fuck even actually knows their IQ? Those online tests are bullshit and everyone lies anyway. I have no clue what mine actually is.

>>657939882
Tits or GTFO.

>>657938459
Possibly, yes.
I only wouldn't, in principle, date a girl who was more naturally talented at programming than me. But I don't know for sure.

>>657939692
>IQ 204 here
What are you even doing on /b/?

I'm only attracted to girls that I feel inferior to, so yes.

>>657938459
>Implying having high IQ is the same as being smart

File: 1336427251155s.jpg (3KB, 126x105px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 126x105px

>>657938677
because she is more intelligent?? or just smart? these two things are different.

I'd like the challenge, even if she's superior, i must have something she wants, for she's still around.

>>657940023
Taking samples and making statistics

I would.
IQ tests suck, though.

>>657939929
it's below 100

Yes, because dumb people are dumb. Although, I would date not-so-smart girls too. I would date any girl tbh. Would date anything that moves to be quite frank.

Thank god for Israel

>>657938459
Hell yes.

I'm always the smart one and surrounded by uneducated dumbfucks.
That would be a nice change to meet someone I can have a conversation with, or someone who can explain things to me

>>657940286
Unlikely.

>>657939929
I took the MInD test in Germany and scored 149 (OP here), which got me into TNS.

And no, I doubt anyone else's scores here. MInD is an official, paper test and TNS only got 1700 members worldwide.

>>657938459
It depends if I want someone like me or different from me.
Varies day by day.
The exes always hated hearing that.

>>657938677

She could have a high IQ, and you'd still be able to manipulate her. Manipulation is skilled-based, and I think if she has a very high IQ she is not as socially calibrated and therefore easier to Jedimindtrick.

>>657940220
Man has a point.

A girl who can't challenge me in chess or Go won't do. I want a girl who actually understands what I am talking about when I explain computational steganographic problems.

File: image.gif (361KB, 274x200px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 274x200px

>>657938459
I dated a girl that was a lot more book smart than me.
>graduated hs at 15
>already has her Drs in psych
>other misc degrees
Lasted like 4 months, most things were great but she was a feminist and had a problem with pretty much anything id say. She was vanilla in bed but I turned her into a freak. Broke up with me after finding out about my past. She always made everyone know she was the smartest in the room, she would try to break you down mentally every chance she got. Was a total cunt but I think I loved her.

>>657940756
This fag plays chess, fuckin nerd.

>>657940955
>not liking chess
u wot

>>657940489
Did mine privately and scored 154 but I chose to be an underdog.May or may not change it.
I knoq TNS as an organization who questions people at a yearly rate.

>>657940883
>Broke up with me after finding out about my past.
Did you kill a squirrel and then looked at 14 yr old cp... like the rest of the btards?

>>657940756
playing chess against someone who is absolutely awful is pretty hilarious though

People still use IQ as a measure of intelligence
>my sides

>>657941070
>not playing Go
wut¿?

>>657941070
too predictable, after at most 2 games with any given person the outcome is already known

>>657938459
Luckily neither of these girls meet that criteria

>>657938459
MORE ISRAELI CHICKS

>>657941182
>playing chess against someone who is absolutely awful is pretty hilarious though
No it is not. It stops being hilarious after 90 seconds or so. I prefer to play chess for a while. My Elo is about 1900.

File: DoubtDeerly.jpg (109KB, 1000x706px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1000x706px

>>657939692
>IQ 204
>shit grammar
>>657940237

File: asian_jew_md.jpg (66KB, 380x594px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 380x594px

>>657941385
like this?

Fuck yeah, I would. I've got a hunger for knowledge and I'd like to tap into her brain to learn anything I can.

>>657941549
No, we need some OC!

>>657939017
>This is beta as fuck.

File: ad6gP69_460sa_v1.gif (191KB, 245x160px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 245x160px

>>657938459
>>657938958
>>657939270
>>657939692
>>657939783
tests on Quizilla aren't meant to be taken seriously.

IQ 155, probably isnt going to happen, ever

>>657941287
I also play go.

>>657941297
lol'd
I played chess with the same person for about every other day for 2 years.
AFAIR the score was something like 260 to 210

OP you sound like a faggot, but all my exs were super hot but boarder line retarded except for one. My very last ex studying astrophysics but threw it away to become a model.

I just want a cute nerdy bitch that I can related to.

IQ 134 here

I have three sisters who all have higher IQs than I.

>>657939259
>This is beta as fuck.
Nothing at ALL to do with the topic, but has to brag about his imaginary assets that no one can verify.

>>657941549
more israelis mate

>>657941859
this

>>657938459
You're a NEET aren't you?

>>657941990
OP here. Yeah, I am.

>>657941151
Lol no, Just a lot of bullshit. I'm 6'5 230 at 21 so when I played football there were a lot of girls. A lot. I told her it was a lot and she said she didn't care. Then she started like digging shit up and talking to my friends. Needless to say she was disgusted at my number and other misc things I had done. But I really don't know the real reason we even broke up shit was going great. Like I was going to propose then we got distant so on so forth until we just stopped talking.(apparently wanting her to reply to my texts on a daily basis was hard for her)

>>657941776
Nice but I barely have people to play but you can learn something about your opponents emotional state

File: 988608_570493072993966_1739186882_n.jpg (84KB, 806x960px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 806x960px

>>657941691
better?

I have an IQ equal to that of albert einstein and im soon going to rule over the world faggots

>>657941855
So you fucked your sisters, you low IQ retard?

File: 1413212386654.png (34KB, 152x152px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 152x152px

>>657938459
>implying IQ's represent intelligence
All girls are smarter than you by default, moron.

>>657942294
hahahahahahaha
Good one

>>657942236
Well we knew each other pretty well.
And yes there were bad days where someone would lose all the games, but overall we progressed together and no one really got an advantage over the other with was nice.

tfw everyone here reporting their iq is a dumb bullshitting nerd

>>657938459
You mean "a girl with an IQ higher than yours" not a girl smarter than you.

Bear in mind that women find comfort in a man being better than them in almost every capacity so that ultimately they aren't burdened with many responsibilities, so it often doesn't come down to whether or not you'd date a girl with a higher IQ than you but rather if she'd date a man with an IQ lower than her own. In a rather awful way, it's a lot like how women dislike dating men shorter than themselves in general.

Not that any of it matters if you're both just in it to fuck for a while.

>>657938459

There's more than one kind of intelligence. You cannot even fathom.

Beggars can't be choosers. I'd take whoever would settle for me.

>>657942406
Einstein was pretty low IQ, 130 or so. After general relativity, he pretty much was wrong on a lot of shit and made up ridiculous stuff which was heavily criticized.

>>657941396
maybe try playing for fun once in a while then

>>657942805
>There's more than one kind of intelligence. You cannot even fathom.
That is what low IQ people say.

>>657941720
This

I'm smarter than my bf <3

>>657938459
>implying that I have a choice of which girl I want

>>657943182
Tits or gtfo

>>657942942
You can't play "for fun" if your opponent isn't anywhere near your skill level. That is like asking to play tennis "for fun", if your opponent can't even serve.

The fun in chess and go is to be challenged. But if you could still win even if completely drunk, it ain't fun.

>>657943182
Get outta here, girl. Here is the general IQ scale:

Men: 110-280 with a few outliers
Women: 35-107 with a few outliers

File: image.jpg (61KB, 620x372px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 620x372px

>>657943020
>my IQ is...
This is what losers say

>>657939383
Yes.
>>657939692
liar. Using 50cent words doesn't prove higher intellect. It proves higher autism, since in general we don't communicate that way in daily life. The word "phallus", for example, which seems to be the basis to substantiate your claim to higher intellect, is not used in normal conversation. It would be used when describing the male genitalia of say, insects, between biologists. But you would be 100 times more likely to tell your biologist friend "I have a large penis" than you would say "Phallus". In fact, the word phallus is much more often used as an adjective to describe things as have a "penis-like" shape Note the example: That pencil is rather phallic.

You see, language is used for the purpose of communication, not complication. Throwing around big words to beat your chest and show off your intellect actually shows how dim you really are, since you lack ability to communicate effectively. But let me put it into martian for you so you can have fun puzzling it out:

Eloquacious speech is not so much the art of using euphemisms that complicate ordinary speech, nor requires a thesaurus. It is the proper use of words, in context, that best relay the meaning you wish to convey. Levy your words against your audience and you will elaborate upon your meaning much more effectively. By brow-beating your intended recipients, you only alienate them.

Was that clear enough prig?

>>657939178
define stupid shit

>>657942881
Estimated IQ of 160, according to some study.

So how does your higher potential affect your social life?

I'll start
>school was hel because of me thinking too much
>older friends ftw with 14
>graduate from school
>did okay for skipping literally years of school
>work in shipayment job
>bored by everyone since they are toopredictable
>meet othet underdogs
>no more proving my iq needed
>still socially awkward but pretty alright

Sorry Iamtired so this is not very structured

>A test said I was smart, so I am right ? riight ??

Please OP. You would date anyone.

169 here. Never met a girl.

File: jude.png (193KB, 635x349px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 635x349px

>>657938459
Everyone here has an iq of 148.8, go away subliminal shill

>>657943535
>This is what losers say
In real life, yes. On /b/, no.

What losers say is "there is more than one kind of intelligence." "Social intelligence" ain't "intelligence", it is just a certain way to behave.

>>657938459

Intelligence is a problematic concept. There is one girl who is about at the same percentile of achievement (as measured by quality and quantity of publications) but she is 2 years older than me. I'm 29 and she's 31. I'd hit it because she appears smart but I'm worried about what she'l look like in just a few years.

Girls who don't choose the easy life do have it tough. They need to compete with men while being more anxious and they need to invest a lot more in their looks.

>>657943327
or absolutely dominate them and laugh. you've never just played super smash brothers and crushed someone and felt good about it?

>>657938459
Dude, if she's smart, she won't date me

>>657943779
Obvious neckbeard loser is obvious

>>657943814
go back to reddit faggot

>>657943020

That may be. But that does in no way imply that somebody saying it must have a low IQ. You'll learn when you grow up.

>>657943822
This is not how chess or go work.

There's more to intelligence than IQ, for example it's very possible that someone could be a skilled mechanic and not have a high IQ, but it doesn't make sense to say that they are not intelligent because they can perform a complicated, important task that the vast majority of the population can't.

>>657943779
Just by believing a simple test could sum up human intelligence and rate it, you shown that you were actually quite stupid.

>>657938459
A WHOLE POST TO SAY YOU ARE SMARTER THAN US.

CONGRATS, PAL.

YOU FEELIN RIGHT?

>>657943747
You're a NEET aren't you?

>goes on 4chan
>lies about IQ
for what purpose?

>>657943999
yessssss. Those are the repeating digits I like.

>>657943981

So I should hit it?

If you care about IQ scores that much , and you actually see it as an accomplishment , then you're fucking retarded.

>>657944083
>that someone could be a skilled mechanic and not have a high IQ,
then he is a mechanic, not intelligent
>>657944083
>they can perform a complicated, important task
a monkey can perform a complicated, important task if trained. the point about intelligence and IQ is that high IQ people can do certain things, no one else can do, even given all the training in the world and all the time in the world. This is why top level mathematicians and physicists are all high IQ folks.

>>657940489
>MInD is an official, paper test

What I don't get is how anyone with any intelligence thinks IQ tests actually measure anything that is not defined in terms of the tests themselves.

>>657944069
you're never going to be a grandmaster so why do you have to be such a loose butthole about a game of chess. you must flip the monopoly board when you lose

>>657944087
This

>>657944492
>What I don't get is how anyone with any intelligence thinks IQ tests actually measure anything that is not defined in terms of the tests themselves.

Because, guess what, they do. Guess why all Nobel Prize winners in Physics were high IQ people North of 140 or 150 at a minimum.

>>657943779
People far smarter than you would disagree. There are, according to sources, multiple intelligences. Labeled under that very name (you can google it). There are supposedly 9 now. I'm not sure I completely agree with each of them being an intelligence, but the very very brief of the theory is this:

By addressing a person's individual intelligence you can more effectively communicate with and teach them things if you can tie the lesson into their specific intelligence. That is to say, that someone who is very physically adept learns best through physical activity. If you could then, say, tie math into a physical activity (think sports games and keeping scores) then you will be more effective in teaching that person math.

I also find it funny that you said :
> ain't "intelligence"
because "ain't" wasn't even a word until recent history when the intellectuals gave into the general autism of the nation and said "fine, we'll give the uneducated their word". It might now be recognized as a word, but its still not recognized as used by intelligent people.

>>657944457
IQ is a meaningless number unless the alleged skill is leveraged towards success.
I'd rather be low IQ, with good money than high and unemployed.
That being said, high and unemployed is a good way to waste a couple of years.

>>657944461
I work in science and I've never met a problem I couldn't understand and work on.
Yet I have a fairly average IQ, maybe slightly above.

What's your point ?

>>657944545
Monopoly is a game of luck. Chess is a game of skill.

>do you even no anything?

>>657938459

IQ 253 reporting in.

did i mention my IQ is 253?

>>657939383
Yep. The worst thing is when you meet a hot girl, maybe she's even fun, but then she just opens her mouth, and ugh.... dumb as fuck. I mean, part of me wishes I could date a dumb girl, as long as she were super nice, sweet, fun, etc., but I just don't think I could do it. No matter how hot she were.

File: 1287537625303.jpg (144KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 600x600px

>>657944087
THIS GUY gets it

>>657944545
Did you ever played chess before?

File: chess.jpg (50KB, 780x716px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 780x716px

>>657944834
we weren't comparing the two... but you just confirmed you're way too uptight about chess

>>657939618
haha this is great

>>657944738
That's an absolutely meaningless statement.
Not all Nobel prize winners have been tested for IQ.
There is no way to prove a person's IQ who hasn't been tested.
I bet there are high performing, Nobel prize winning scientists who are hovering about the 110 IQ point, who succeed because they leverage their skills and learning, not because of 'raw talent.'

File: 1448089344542.jpg (55KB, 480x720px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 480x720px

>>657938677
So edgy, don't yourself be careful pls

>>657944796
>What's your point ?
You work in "science"? Are you cleaning a lab or something?

Again, there is a reason why a Gödel or a Schrödinger or a Heisenberg or a Fermi or a Yukawa or a Mössbauer were all high IQ people.

>>657945136
>rancid swine
everi tiem

>>657939997
this

File: 1443648274391.jpg (43KB, 473x555px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 473x555px

>>657938459
I would only date a girl who can get dubs.

>>657945224
>Not all Nobel prize winners have been tested for IQ.
>There is no way to prove a person's IQ who hasn't been tested.
You have absolutely no idea what IQ is, right? And you have absolutely no idea how you can actually estimate someone's IQ without testing him or her, just by watching him lecture or in a conversation? Do you even know what an IQ test tests?

>>657944738
Except of course an idiot like for instance Feynman.

Also notice how you try to justify IQ tests by some other measure? That is because all IQ-scores do is correlate. Specifically they correlate with future success in education and they have been adjusted to do exactly that. Note that they have not been adapted to test for 'genius'. The people making them are not smart enough to devise such a test. All IQ scores above 2.5 to 3 sigma simply indicate 'high probability of academic success', which is useless since this ofc is obvious to any teacher of such a kid. already.

>>657945298
and how many of those scientists either gave stock to IQ, or even got tested?
If they didn't get tested, prove to me that they have a high IQ.
Richard Feynman himself had an IQ of 125, and he's one of the most important physicists of the 20th century.

>>657945224
>Nobel prize winning scientists who are hovering about the 110 IQ point, who succeed because they leverage their skills and learning,
In literature or peace, ok, but not in physics or economics or chemistry. Just impossible, sorry to say. If you do not understand basic physics (because your IQ is average), then you can't excel in the field. You could work 24 hours a day, it won't help.

>>657940237

I lol'ed

Well done you

Dating an azn qt in nursing school, I myself will matriculate to med school this summer. She's smart, but why does she sound dumb sometimes?

>>657945610
You are the one who lacks knowledge about an IQ test. You don't even know what it tests.
>>657945819
Prove me wrong.

>>657945224
to add to that, Einstein...without argument said to be the smartest man in history to date, was initially thought to be of very low IQ and failed in mathematics in school.

IQ is a meaningless number. As we learn more and more about the brain, even modern psychologists don't rely on it much anymore. Its becoming more of a novelty than an actual tool. Its been proven to be culturally biased as well, meaning that people in Northernmost America are the average range, southern America tend to score about 5 points lower, Asians tend to score about 5 points higher.

>>657944741
Finnally someone who agrees on the ain't topic.
I am not even a native english speaker and I get shivers when someone says that

>>657945718
>Richard Feynman himself had an IQ of 125, and he's one of the most important physicists of the 20th century.
Please, what? Do you even know what he worked in? He has done shit that is cutting edge. Nothing that is important for anything.

>>657945610
>mistakes the variable for the measure
>lectures people on intelligence

You probably also think degrees Celsius are heat.

So many strawberries man.

>>657938459
I've dated a woman with a masters in science and a woman with PHD in engineering. I convinced both to take an IQ test, and beat one by 12 points and one by 4.

Yes, they were a little mad. I'm a college dropout.

>>657946030
>was initially thought to be of very low IQ and failed in mathematics in school.
Because he was relatively stupid with an IQ of 125 to 130. He was pretty thick when talking to people and needed to write everything down to visualize. People hated to work with him, because he was so slow following. After the "basic physics breakthroughs" he stumbled upon when he was young, he was doing shit nothing for 40 years.

>>657946030
Thanks.
There is no way a three digit score from a short duration subjective test could accurately quantify the complexity of human intellect.

>>657946043
He did more than you ever have.
Feynman's calculations were crucial to Manhattan, and if you think otherwise you are either deluded or an idiot. I think I know which one.

>>657946039
Ain't so, buddy.

File: Screenshot_2015-12-09-00-15-42_kindlephoto-3285404.jpg (18KB, 345x331px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 345x331px

>>657938459
>I have an iq of 149

Bro
You're on /b/
I find this hard to believe.

File: DSC_0016.jpg (413KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 2048x1536px

>>657945298
>Gödel or a Schrödinger or a Heisenberg or a Fermi or a Yukawa or a Mössbauer
So, assuming this is true, which I'm too lazy to check, it's 6 supposedly high IQ people among literally hundreds of Nobel prize winners.
You sound more and more like a retard who is clinging as it's IQ like a sailor as a piece of wood in a shipwreck.

Anyway, pic related was given to me when I was 13, I found it interesting and not that complicated.

Also, I work in computer science now, and I'm doing fairly well thank you.

Again, what's your point ?

>>657943555
Can you even spell?

>>657938459
>i never met a girl who is smarter than me
>i never
i have never
am i the only person who thinks that for a person who has "149" iq his grammar is shit?

>>657946351
>Feynman's calculations were crucial to Manhattan,
95% of the Manhattan project was an engineering challenge. The physics of it wasn't much of a challenge. And Feynman was just a junior assistant at Manhattan.

>>657938459
People who find value in their IQ score are fucking stupid. It's a measure of your ability to take a test. You're not a genius, you're a narcissist.

>>657946039
when I grew up, the saying "ain't" ain't a word was used whenever somebody said it and they were generally teased for being stupid. Then sometime around in the 90's I think it was, it was announced in the news that due to large popular use, it was being added to the dictionary. Talk about complete cringe moment.

File: nice try b8ing.webm (501KB, 414x232px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 414x232px

>>657946281
Fish aren't biting today.

>>657946520
>Anyway, pic related was given to me when I was 13
At that age I was technical studying physics in university.

So what's your point?

>>657946697
>It's a measure of your ability to take a test. You're not a genius, you're a narcissist.
QFT

>>657946879
Prove it.

>>657946705
Being alive before the 90s! Get the fuck out old cuck fag

>>657946791
Hey, don't say that, I got them to 172 replies on this thread alone with various retards making a play on "how unimportant IQ tests are". "Ain't" that g8 b8 m8?

>>657946281

Anyone who engages in Einstein bashing to support 'IQ' as a valid measure of anything must have some deep-rooted issues. That is some special pleading right there. You sound like neckbeard who only has his high IQ in online tests to support his ego. Protip nigger: no-one cares.

>>657946972
I am not giving you my name. How should I prove it? I have graduated high school at 14 and have audited university lectures since 12 and graduated when I was 16.

>>657944235
You're life is so small this is the only way to get yourself validation.

I always wonder why people in the internet are always so smart. I do not even know my IQ, I just don't give a damn about it.

>>657947149
Protip, I actually studied Einstein's work. He was lucky in 1905, that is all. After that he was just the retard he was before 1905.

It's not like he came up with the photoelectric effect and specific relativity out of thin air anyway.

>>657947275
I don't care how. Unless you can prove it, you're a limp dick little teenager lying on 4chan.
Not even worth my time interacting. I'm smarter than the average American, but I can't prove this. I can prove my dick is bigger, though.

>>657945819
>Being this retarded.
People with average IQ can quite easily understand basic physics you retard. IQ =/= actual intelligence.

the unearned self-importance in this thread is suffocating.

>>657946281
actually, he was posthumously diagnosed with Asperger syndrome. Your assessment on working with him is correct, but he wasn't exactly slow in the classical sense. When he worked alone he was actually quite brilliant.

A quick synopsis of what happens to someone with Asperger is like taking a computer and then making it run multiple tasks to the point that it slows down to inefficiency. If the computer can operate on a single task, it handles it better than any other system. An Asperger patient suffers similarly from the stimulation in the environment. When able to be in a closed environment they function quite well. When there is lots of stimulation, they have a lot of difficulty focusing. But this is not a discussion thread on Aspergers.

Actually, Einstein wrote his initial theories, revolutionized physics and did a great many things afterwards. Including helping to create the atomic bomb, which was his greatest regret in life. He sat around for 40 years after he retired, but he didn't do "nothing". He continued to discuss and advise throughout his life. And yes, he was a rather "eccentric" personality.

>>657946879
>At that age I was technical studying physics in university
Sure why not.

So you got into university a bit earlier than me. Good for you!
But what was it for ?
Easy question: What did you accomplish that I didn't ?
Harder question: What did you accomplish that I can't ?
Tick question: Can you achieve what I have ?
Unverifiable question: Will you ever be able to understand what I understand about computers and logic ?

Unless you can answer all this questions, I repeat: what's the point of having a high IQ and going to university at 13 ?

>but then again, your probably just a redneck living a fantasy, so whatever.

>>657946705
I live in Germany and it got worse here.
The new Geberation of pretend to be intellectuals is using language no longer as a form to express their thougts but to follow somemoral code.
A dialect is okay but it is possible to rape the ability to form words.
I was lazy but I still educated myself out of boredom and I somehow manage to outsmart most of the people I meet.
Only when it comes to music, math and physics Ican only sit and silently follow a conversation since I prefered to work instead getiing a higher education.

>>657947830
Married his cousin too, the ol' Yid perv.

>>657938459
>girl
>smarter than me
>implying

File: 2pac.jpg (526KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 1280x960px

>>657938459
Would you date a girl as smart as you or even smarter?

I never met a girl. I have an IQ of 149. But I would date a girl smarter than me.

>fixed it

>>657947573
>I actually studied Einstein's work
As did everyone in physics nigger, find something else to feel special about.

By all means though, keep bashing Einstein. Monkeys need to bang on something after all.

>>657938916
IQ tests are extremely subjective. they essentially tet for one type of intelligence. it would make more sense if it put more of a focus on critical thinking but i suppose thats difficult to test. lazy ass test makers

>>657938459
I find it extremely hard to believe you have an IQ above 110. Extremely hard.

File: 1448250673253.jpg (57KB, 492x490px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 492x490px

>2015
>everyone on /b/ is a genius
>everyone on /b/ has a choice of gf

File: lies.jpg (35KB, 453x576px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 453x576px

>>657947555
Nice trips. They are smart for the same reason they have 8 inch dicks.

>>657947275
Show your birth certificate or ID or something, cover the identifying details, but establish your age. Then show your university transcript, covering identifying details.

If you're such a fucking genius, why can't you figure that out? You lying fuck.

File: 1438278114240.png (544KB, 531x711px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 531x711px

>>657940489
>IQ of 149
>"only got"

>>657948168
O bless.

>>657947983
Dude did say he was a NEET, you if you're employed, you win!

>>657947557
fucking hot

>>657947830
>actually, he was posthumously diagnosed with Asperger syndrome.
Asperger's is not a disease, so can't be "diagnosed". Asperger himself just labelled it a special form of mind and character. It is not autism, which is an actual disease which can get "diagnosed".

>>657947728
>People with average IQ can quite easily understand basic physics you retard.
No, they can't, which is why the top universities don't take in low IQ people in their physics courses.

IQ of 159 here. I would. She'd probably make me feel small. Step on my dick w/ her stilettos. It'd be heaven.

>>657938459
>Would you date a girl
Let me stop you right there OP
Yes

>>657938459
my IQ blew the IQ scale, but I would date a girl smarter than me. Would be like dating god.

>>657939261
You've probably met one and she was just ugly af and autistic

>>657949656
I have dated God, she was an all-knowing, selfish bitch. Broke up around 0 AD

>>657949520
>top universities don't take in low IQ people in their physics courses
I see your fantasy is still alive and well.

>>657947573
>It's not like he came up with the photoelectric effect and specific relativity out of thin air anyway.
>It's not like he came up with the photoelectric effect and specific relativity
>It's not like he came up with

Um...its not like YOU came up with anything your whole life. And you call the theory of relativity, being a "Got Lucky" moment? Are you fucking serious? You gotta be trollin. The Theory of Relativity revolutionized physics and nearly all of science. Its given the world a better understanding of the universe at large. Saying this is like saying "Well, after the apple fell, Newton didn't really contribute anything worthwhile to science". Einstein may have been something like a one-hit wonder, but he was productive his whole life. How many normal physicists are ever heard from on a daily basis? By what standard are you measuring Einstein as a stupid and lucky?

>>657938459
I have never met a woman as intellectually superior as me, my IQ is 174.

>>657938459
I actually currently dating a girl who is smarter than me on paper. She is better at Algebra, Geometry, or maths in general. But I am better at manipulating people. It's all about balance in relationships and it is because she is so good at maths and I'm a bit more of a smooth talker that we keep about three steps ahead in any challenge.

>>657949897
>You gotta be trollin

The answer right there, next time you can gr8b8m8 and leave.

File: https%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2F1fc2d50448141119e0cfcde0e152d6a8%2Ftumblr_inline_ny0zvgggm91qbfr6s_540.jpg (52KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x500px

>>657943555
>English major detected
Was that supposed to be hard to understand m8? Also, I think circumlocutious would've been a better word than eloquacious in that context.

>>657949897
>By what standard are you measuring Einstein as a stupid and lucky?
Facts. Look at his work and the circumstances that they were made. Read his papers published in 1905 and the work he has done subsequently. There is a reason for all of this. He was lucky like winning the lottery in 1905, and it showed later on.

>>657938459
An equal or more intelligent partner is what I'm looking for. No IQ bullshit, more of the simple feeling of being on the same page about stuff.

>>657950037
>She is better at Algebra, Geometry, or maths in general.
>>657950037
>I'm a bit more of a smooth talker
You are both retards judging from your post. Good for you, you deserve each other.

>>657950078
still not used to the internet. I grew up in the era where phones were tied to walls still and the media was trusted.

>>657939259
Why only 9/10 ? Why don't you have a 10/10 gf like all of us on the internet ?


The funny thing that i've learned from such thread is that if you'd think that people with high IQ would have hobbies like reading, or theatre, or things like that you are wrong. The most common hobby for people with IQ over 130 is posting on 4chan about how smart they are.

And oddly, it's a shared hobby with people who have lots of money, a perfect body, or a huge dick.

It feel good to share the place with such gifted people...

>>657943555
>proves higher autism
>literally no connection with autism, which usually includes communication problems

>>657938459
GUYSSS GUYSSS I HAVE A IQ OF 190 GUYS 190!!!!!! GUYS I NEEED ATTENTION GUYS PLEASE LOOK AT ME I AM VERY REALLY SMART LOOK GUYS IQ 190 IM NOT EVEN KIDDING PLEASE GUYS RESPOND PLZ IM SO SMART I WOULD DATE A GIRL WHICH IS SMARTER THAN ME BUT IM SMARTEST HOOMAN ON EARTH LOLOLOL GUYS 190 IQ NO KIDDING PLZ RESPOND

>>657943555
Language does have the purpose of communication.

Language is a kind of mental framework, communication is epiphenomenal, get rekt fagget

>>657950407
say what you will but we keep ahead.
Can't stop us

>>657950569
/thread

>>657949520
>which is why the top universities don't take in low IQ people
Confirmed for lying faggot. None of the "top universities" screen for IQ.

>>657938459
Fuck no nigger, I want a bitch as dumb as a rock but hot as hell. Easy to talk your way in and out of shit.

>>657950409
Oldfag is old and a fag

>>657938459
Sure i would, i have met a few and they were nice although as a man i would like to feel more intelligent but it works fine even if the girl is smarter.

>>657950228
You've never kissed a girl virgin.

>>657950212
circumlocutious would imply the need to get around a topic, whereas eloquacious is the art of beautiful speech. Since I was responding to a post where the person was using words bigger than his mouth could handle in an attempt to sound intelligent, I was explaining how to do so. Not explaining how to circumvent the topic, but expound upon it beautifully.

I need a girl who is smart enough to do anything I can. And I'm what we call "exceptionally gifted" or "genius" intellectually. So I need a woman who is brilliant, really. I don't care if the IQ is higher as long as she isn't a know it all (at least no more than I am.) I don't know if a girl exists like that, who is also attractive enough to strike my fancy. I might be left to a life of manipulating hoes instead. For now I can keep coming on dumb bitches' faces

>>657950765
SATs are IQ tests. There is a high correlation between IQ and SAT results. Look into it.

>>657950971
Citation required

>>657950212
>>657950844
and no, it wasn't supposed to be hard to understand. This is:

我的天这个太傻了。晚安。

>>657939259
post a picture of you

>>657950486
You have high IQ, loads of money, dating a 10/10 girl and have a huge dick too?

File: 69baby.jpg (203KB, 1280x777px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1280x777px

>>657950569

>>657950971
Source?

>>657950971
SATs are NOT IQ tests. Holy fuck you don't even understand basic things. Of course there is a correlation between the 2, it sure as shit doesn't make them equivalent. And more to the point, NEITHER OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY ADEQUATE MEASURES OF FUNCTIONAL INTELLIGENCE. They measure your ability to take a fucking test.

The irony is that anybody who cites their IQ score to prove how smart they are has just confirmed how fucking desperately average they actually are.

>>657951150
What in "look into it" didn't you understand?

>>657951239
yeah sure, otherwise i would'nt be posting here, it's a requirement

File: 1300019794190.jpg (302KB, 1025x1485px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1025x1485px

>>657938459
Everyone I've ever dated has probably been smarter than me, I'm pretty fucking dumb and uneducated.

All I need is da pusi b0ss

>>657951194
Nice google/bing translate faggot, shame about your fear of clean air and ultraviolet rays

>>657950844
Eloquacious -
Created by marrying "eloquent" and "loquacious." Specifically meaning: "the ability to create brand new words, that sound as if they've always, truly existed, and mean exactly what you think they would."

Circumlocutious - roundabout and unnecessarily wordy; "had a preference for circumlocutious (or circumlocutory) rather than forthright expression"

My good sir, what words did he make up? None, he was just being unnecessarily wordy in an attempt to sound smarter than he really is.

Amazing, all these gods amongst men, posting on /b/.

>>657938459
>>>
> Anonymous 12/17/15(Thu)14:24:42 No.657951239▶
>>>657950486
I would marry a girl who was smarter than I. And have babies with her. But you have posted pretty girls. It's hard to find pretty and smart in the same girl.

>>657951599
actually, I read and write Chinese. Not googled. But, since there is no way to prove that, it doesn't matter.

File: 1373462922512.jpg (40KB, 370x278px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 370x278px

>>657938459
>smart
>IQ

>>657951860
picture of paper with Chinese writing with time stamp

>>657951776
Though it has been proven that the more attractive you are, the high probability of them being smarter due to positive reinforcement

>>657951860
Sharpie in pooper for proof

>>657952002
Must be clean writing, with the strokes done in correct order

מה נהיה פה.. ואני חשבתי ש /b/ שונאים יהודים ואת ישראל..
יאללה יהודונים תראו נוכחות

>>657951860
Picture of paper with your chinese writings and today's newspaper

>>657951860
timestamped micropenis pic for proof

>>657951776
Not really. Pretty and smart is somewhat common. Say you've got a 1/3 chance of being smart, 1/3 to be pretty and 1/3 to have a likeable personality. So, 1/9 girls would be either smart and pretty, pretty and likeable or smart and likeable. But what you're not finding is smart likeable and pretty, which would be 1/27. I realise people don't have a 1/3 chance of being smart or whatever but that's basically the reason for all the let-down girls out there

>>657952266
double dubs say you you must

>>657951697
Dear sir, again, I fear you misunderstand me. As you eloquently put it. The original poster I responded to said
>IQ 204 here, the thought of sticking my phallus into a woman never comes to mind but in any case I froze sperm to carry on a legacy

and I was only explaining to this poster that the use of the word "phallus" is no proof of intellect, since although proper use grammatically, has no business in daily speech.

>>657950971
>>657951410
Any test that can be improved by studying isn't measuring raw intelligence, it's measuring memory encoding and recall.

>CONFIRMED FOR STUPID LYING FAGGOT

>>657952002
Oh, fine. Give me a few minutes I'll see what I can do.

>>657952492
Intelligence is increasing with training.

>>657952742
HOLY SHIT you're retarded. Knowledge =/= intelligence.

>CONFIRMED FOR STUPID NARCISSIST LYING FAGGOT

Black guy, IQ 64 here. I really hope I will find a girl smarter than me. Anyone here wanna date me? Please don't be racist.

>>657951239
High IQ is a risk factor for having shit social skills. Shit social skills is a risk factor for being some sort of fag on /b/. I never buy all this shit about 6'5" with a 9" dick and knockout wife, but the percentage of high iq's should be a lot higher than the general population

>>657953089
is a girl with a feminine penis good enough for you ?

>>657952568
What I would do is go to my local Chinese restaurant and get them to write me something. It's less then a block away and they like me there.

>>657938459
Yep, kinda want a woman to challenge me intellectually, otherwise the relationship is one sided small talk, that is dull, I'm above average intelligence, currently going for STEM associates degree. I hate to sound like a hipster faggot, but a girl who's not afraid to be herself and if she will not conform to other people's ideologies is perfect
Tl;dr
Yes, smarter than me and steadfast in her values

I got 76 for an IQ and packin a 5 incher

File: Behind+Scenes+Cast+Jackass+Spoofing+Best+Picture+iVxpcBqmtjZx.jpg (150KB, 984x1024px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 984x1024px

>>657938459
just the fact you're asking this question proves that you're dumb as fuck

>>657953212
Nah there are a lot of average people who are doing okay in real life in here really

>>657952492
this guy understands. this is why some niggers are still known to do well on SAT and ACT tests. IQ is completely different than learning whatever amerifag professors decided you should know.

>>657952441
Iq of 204? So you're telling me that when you were 8 years that you were literally smarter (like, would have done better on the math section of the SAT) than the average 16 year old? Because that's what that means. And I doubt it

File: IMG_20151218_043759.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

>>657953401
>>657952002
here, but it proves nothing
>>657952266
I don't get the newspaper nor do I buy it. My Chinese is not that good.
In fact, most of the Chinese I "write" is via pinyin with my phone from text messages. I can read far more than I can write.

>>657938459
I just want to date a girl who is smart enough to talk herself out of me raping her.

>>657938459
my iq is 63
dick is 3.5 inches long
salary is <₩100,000 p.a
you suck

Frenchfag underachiever here.

Took an IQ test 2 years ago (WAIS), got 160, which seems to be the maximum.

Actually took the test because I was sinking into depression and felt myself becoming slowly dumber every day, and therefore feared about losing it.

Didn't change shit though, still in med school and still depressed.

>>657954015
God you're bad at writing chinese characters, even an old blind woman could write straighter characters

File: IDIOT.gif (495KB, 500x244px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 500x244px

>>657954015
Essentially everything OP has said has been indicative of an average intelligence narcissist neckbeard NEET, and a lying faggot fuck.

>>657954015
I bet my korean shits on your chinese and I am retarded
wtf are you even trying to prove you autistic fuck
consider killing yourself

>>657951470
Obvious faggot is obvious

>>657938459
>>657938958
>>657938916
>>657941764
>>657945688
>>657945718
>>657951410

>ITT: retards who think they are geniuses, but are too stupid to know how IQs work.

>>657954015
I can copy characters from google translator, too.

Have you thought about joining Autistics Anonymous?

>>657951470
What part of "burden of proof" don't you understand?
>CONFIRMED FOR FAGGOT

OP is a faggot Case closed

ITT: retared betas trying to prove themselves they achieved something in their shitty life because they took an IQ test online and had a good result

File: image_2197.jpg (79KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 400x300px

>>657954929