Muthafuckin aircraft thread! Starting off with a MiG-25.
Me-163 Komet
su-37, su-47, and a MiG-35
>>554179318
My mistake 2 su-27 flankers
MiG-29
F-15
>fighter aircraft
and now here some real airplane.
>>554178981
Contributing with saab Erieye and Gripen Combo
Power from Sweden coming your way - JAS 39 Gripen
aircraft bukkake
Fw-190a8
inb4 warthog
>>554181273
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT
>>554181102
Gripens are sexy
k
You cant have a aircraft thread with out the yf-23..
>>554181660
metalbro?
>>554178981
Avro Arrow, mandatory. Personally i find the similarity between the arrow and the 25 to be.... suspicious at the least.
>>554181783
I claim to be no one, but the time for sentient aircraft with rockin' tits has come
>>554182049
The cause of every UFO sighting.
Mig 29 Fulcrum.
>>554181840
>merrr canadians robbed again
I'm a canadian and I think that's fucking retarded
victor mk2
>>554181783
>>554182014
Pssht
>>554182430
why
>>554178981
Gimme some F-104 Starfighters!!!!
>>554182448
you're an edgy anti-patriot who would deny anything just to seem special. Besides seriously look at the two planes side by side. Then check their stats. similar weights, similar speeds and altitude limits, similar deseign and engines. The mig-25 was an awesome plane, if anything it explains why dem americans didn't want us having such a good plane.
avro Shackleton mr mk3 . the last airworthy 1
>>554182713
favoring smaller tits for functionality and stealth capabilities, makessense
>>554183043
Cannot imagine what WWII would have been like if they were able to mass produce thses fuckers and to fix the reactor problem.
Y'all be in the danger zone know! F-14 Tomcat for the win.
identify this aircraft i'd like to know what model it is and where i can find it
>>554183281
Or put more focus on the uboat war, built Walter's uboat, etc, etc.
>>554182804
because your mind is tellin you no... but your body... your body's tellin you yes
SR-71 Blackbird. Most beautiful plane out there. Theres one siting within walking distance of my house.
>>554183281
>>554183670
Both of those, the late war developments in aircraft and the typr XXI and beyond U-boats were crazy.
Go-229 was such an awesome looking plane
>>554183660
the new world champ at hide and seek
>>554183812
it is one hell of a sexy jet for sure
>>554183812
Prime example of american over-engineering. Did you know that the mig-25 was almost as fast as the blackbird? Blackbird tp speed mach 3.3 mig 25 mach 3.1.
>>554179318
the way the black one's wings face forward....so majestic
>>554184245
correction, according to wiki, mig 25 top speed: mach 3.2.
>>554182548
holy shit it looks like something out of a sci-fi movie
that's fucking badass
Any crew chiefs on?
>>554184245
muh freedom though
Where's all my rotary wing at
Military pilotfag here
Pic related
>>554182843
I'm an edgy anti patriot because I don't think the mig 25 was a stolen Canadian design for no discernible reason.
You're a paranoid fag.
Just because somebody else wanted to create a high-speed interceptor doesn't mean they stole the idea, please tell me you're not that utterly retarded.
The weights aren't even remotely the same, the Mig 25 weighs like half the Arrow does.
Besides, if you knew a bit more about the Mig 25 it had it's own engineering and material peculiarities. Specifically pertaining to it's welded construction which made it particularly vulnerable so that it could remain lighter and accelerate faster.
Seriously, don't be a stupid fag. If being a patriot means being an ignorant fuck, I'm glad I'm not by your definition.
>>554184397
The mig 25 could also only maintain 80,000 feet for 2 minutes and could only maintain those for slightly longer before the engines melted themselves. Mach 3.2 was recon version, mach 2.8 was combat version
>>554183853
Yup. German high command made some blunders with their land emphasis.
>>554182843
Decent plane other then the fact that its engines would kill themselves if you flew at high speed for almost any amount of time the controls inside where so scatted that it was hard to reach for things it couldn't turn for shit also you could barely see out of the thing they only could keep the wings swept forward when taking off and landing cause of tearing sises missiles would fall off if you turned to hard and its combat radius was 186 miles..
But it had a pretty good auto pilot so its got that going for it?
>>554184245
The mig 25 could only sustain mac 3.2 at 82000 feet for 2 min before it burn out its engines..
Finally, a thread I can contribute something other than cancer to.
E-3 Sentry
Mig 25 pilots where known to take the jet up to 80k feet and go full afterburner straight up untill their engines burnt out and let there jets get up into the 120k range which is pretty cool..
>>554184245
>Never Shot down by USSR. Ever.
Not bad for "american over-engineering".
Commie drunkard just got blown the fuck out.
Now get back to sucking down vodka and beating off to underage Ukrainian boys.
>>554184842
>>554184901
Mmm, whereas the blackbird will vomit fuel everywhere when not cruising at supersonic speeds, because it was designed for the body to expand under friction created heat. Both are very purpose built planes, but the blackbird is like the american pride and joy for some reason, whereas the mig was russian welded cheap to replace interceptor. which was a good thing probably considering...
>>554182548
That...is fucking beautiful.
>>554179318
ohhh i'm jerkin it to that reverse wing as i type ohhh. the thing just looks badass
Classified: Top Secret
The Aurora Project
>>554185523
Ild rather vomit fuel then flame out at 82k feet good luck ejecting out of that death trap also..
Spain contributes with transports
>>554185736
I think people are missing the point. The blackbird was totally over-engineered, just so that it could set that world speed record. It was an awesome reconnaissance aircraft to be sure, but i dunno it doesn't impress me all that much considering how much went into it.
>>554185615
>>554185523
>but the blackbird is like the american pride and joy for some reason
It's the ultimate hot rod aircraft. A speed machine built with one purpose: to fuck over and embarrass Reds, which it did with uncontested superiority for decades.
They even had an interceptor version ready to go. Know why it wasn't built? Because the USSR had no high speed surveillance aircraft of its own worth countering. Eagles and Tomcats did the job perfectly fine, so a mach 3.5 interceptor carrying a nuclear-warhead-tipped radar missile wasn't necessary.
The flying wing from Raiders of the Lost Ark
the mig 25 was made of nickel steel not titanium, therefore much heavier than the sr-71, and did not even close to match its top speed, the reason some think the top speed of the mig is 3+ is because an unmanned russian surveillance plane traveling at mach 3.1 was thought to be a mig thatd gone missing on US radar over the arctic. the actual top speed of a mig is mach 2.6
>>554186097
but.... why not? that would have been so cool.
>>554186076
>The blackbird was totally over-engineered
You don't even know what those words means, you autistic slavic subhuman.
The SR-71 was one of the most precisely engineered and purpose built machines on the planet. It was not 'over engineered', it was perfectly engineered to exceed that capabilities of USSR manufacturing.
Go weep over Stalins grave and felate the cast of his microcock you keep in your front pocket.
A question for you engineers: Could this thing fly in real life if built properly?
>>554186076
Better then the u-2 that thing was dangerous..
The sr did what it was designed for and thats more then you can say for the mig 25. now the mig 31 is fairly nice..
The us actually used mig-25s to train pilots for a while
>>554186530
Not at all.
G14 in pic, G4 in vid, dat engine sound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjTUuxDzTc
>>554186530
I'm not an engineer and it's obvious that valkyrie won't fly. Why would you even ask that?
>>554186530
>Fictional mats
Fiction is your friend.
Eh bby u want sum TSR-2?
>>554186530
No lift-producing surfaces, "wings" shown wouldn't even qualify as an airfoil.. Unless the fucker thrust vectored it's ass all over the place with some giant turbines id say no
>>554186479
Aw, butt-hurt because someone dissed the plane that you loved as a kid or what?
Anyway contributing more pics of some of my favourite airplanes
f-15 eagle
F-22 Raptor, surprised this hasnt been posted already
keep it going anons, i'm loving it
>did my first solo flight in one of these
T-65
you are all so lame with your fighters and bombers
>>554186714
well actually the mig 25 did exactly what it was meant to do too. It was a cheap mass-produced short range intercepter, the cheapest part of which was the pilot. If it crashed ot fell apart in mid-air, just get another one and put a barely trained potato farmer in it, good to go.
B...Brrt?
>>554186846
Meant this vid, 109 G10, love the supercharger sound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nj77mJlzrc
>>554187830
Provided that that pilot wasn't a drunk and the plane could hold together long enough for them to crash it somewhere maybe they might get a missile off..
>>554186193
As cool looking as it was, there were a lot of things that annoyed me about it because it made it so clear that it was just a prop.
Can't believe no one's posted this yet. F-4 Phantom II.
>>554178981
tiny image thread, starting off with a tiny image
>>554187440
Don't, the haters will have a field day, bringing up every time it has lost a mock-dogfight against a typhoon... Within visual range, of course.
F-101 Voodoo is indeed sexy.
The plane that single-handedly won WW2
>>554189420
>single handedly...
noooo.
It was just the right tool for the right job opening at the right time...
It was a very large and important role yes, but NOT by any means single handed.
>>554189420
Gorgeous.
>>554189420
hue
>>554189420
i learned the other day they also did reckon with this baby..
No ammo, just cameras, and a nice alone trip to Germany
>takes guts
>>554181840
Both planes are worthless.
>>554189916
fuck the shitty Hurricane
>>554189941
That was mostly done by the mosquito.....
IIRC fastest plane in the sky at that time..
Pilots flew with no ammo, armour removes, completely thinned out... all non esential equipment removed to gain every knot possible... purely for photographing the enemy.
>>554187207
I watched a documentary of the SR-71, it's a good watch.
>>554190241
>implying it didn't do 5x the work of the spitfire
>>554190027
The arrow was nothing special really. a simple delta wing interceptor. The engines in it though, those Orenda Iroquois engines, were something special.
>>554190438
5x the work and it still couldn't keep up
>>554190372
thats what i though..
will leave here the video of it, i think its worth every single minute
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie3SrjLlcUY
The 2 planes that decided the war in Europe!
>>554189420
Russia won it, not the Britbongs.
>>554184907
that's at Duxford imperial war museum.
i've seen those exact aircraft fly during an event
>pic related
i have hundreds of pics from my visit
>>554191079
Hitler's incompetence won the war for the Allies.
>>554191029
low level bait!
There is a reason the brits left the daytime raids to the yanks..
Same reason that my grandfater (signals oficer) said to me once (and it is pretty much the only thing he ever mentioned about the war).. "By D-day +1, I just stopped talking to the americas, they were so dissoganised, you could tell they were going to die, so I didnt waste my time getting to know them."
L39.
The very underpowered, very simply designed training jet..
I like it because as someone who is learning to fly (in a Cessna 172).. you can actually realisticaly own if you won the lottery. A fantasy that could actually come true.
Hellcat
>>554192140
8/8 looks gr8 m8
>>554191219
>>554192412
>>554183281
shorter
Dg1000.. first airfract I flew... no one forgets their first time.
>>554192713
>>554192923
It looks like a flying fish.
Boom boom bang! My plane under construction.
>>554182169
Also many fit the description of people wearing gas masks. Image how odd that'd be to someone who hadn't seen one. Also these explain a lot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_VZ-9_Avrocar
>>554184245
I read somewhere that the SR-71 is capable fo going well beyond that speed engine-wise provided it has enough fuel. However the windows of the cockpit couldn't withstand the forces of mach 3.5+ and would literally fall out. Still my fav aircraft ^^
>>554193697
Also best story ever: http://www.econrates.com/reality/schul.html
>>554193238
Hahaha the air car, nice anon. Didn't think anyone else here would know of it's existance.
The whole thread and I don't see a Fighting Falcon anywhere.
Son I am disappoint
>>554194212
you mean the lawn dart?
>>554193863
Fuck me, that's awesome.
Fw-190 A-8/N
Also
F 14 Tomcat
>>554185209
get your FSX bullshit out of here
>>554195005
There is a tomcat here already i posted it earlier.
see >>554183316
>>554181840
That's why they discontinued the Aero, all it's secrets were stolen.
Is the chinese J-31 any good?
I'm a normal fag who cannot into airplane
But I wonder if Japan has single handedly manufactured any real futuristic planes lately?
http://www.janes.com/article/39936/darpa-to-progress-vtol-x-plane-as-boeing-reveals-phantom-swift-details?utm_campaign=%5bPMP%5d_PC5308_Jane%27s%20360%20Newsletter%2030.06.14_DeploymentEmail_KV&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua
What do you think VTOL commercial passenger planes would look like?
>>554195005
You know it's such a sexy plane, needs more pics anyway.
Also needs this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siwpn14IE7E&feature=kp
>>554184245
The SR-71 is a marvel of engendering, also it can sustain it's speed where as the MiG-25 will perm entry damage it's engines. Plus the SR-71 had an incredibly small radar cross section, and the fact they didn't have computers to design it is amazing.
>>554196451
Reminded me of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TSH6OmO-Dw
>>554196483
>they didn't have computers to design it
This is what is truly amazing.
Needs more NB-36H
>>554196429
oh shit. it begins.
>>554196631
awesome.
>>554196483
>>554196772
You know the no computers thing is something that never really occured to me before, but yeah that is pretty cool.
>>554197323
ikr
No planes, but this is almost equally awesome
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGzOfXITytg
>>554197671
What does this look like, a boat thread?
>>554198056
fuck your rules
Can't forget the Death from Above, the AC-130U.
Nicknamed "Spooky" unlike other AC-130 models which use the nickname "Spectre" for the smoke trails their flares emit.
>>554197671
Nice, but belongs in a boat thread. So does this though http://video.ca.msn.com/watch/video/navy-ship-hits-massive-wave/1gl2zg1z7?from=en-ca-quad but it's cool to see.
>>554183812
How's Beale treating you?
>>554198182
Forgot pic
>>554198254
That shit's brutal as fuck
look a airplane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLANvnpvYwM
Probably tens of years away until we get something like this but still pretty neat concept.
>>554198523
Just look at that beauty.
>>554198730
I can't wait until the Auroa is able to used in action.
>>554198927
mmmmm... commercial aviation porn.
>>554198927
how about dc-6?
>>554198624
>>554199012
The Auroa is supposedly going to be an drone bomber. it's original concept was meant to have a single pilot, but due to its incredible speeds they made it an unmanned drone.
>>554199216
so many buttons, is the one with yellow/black stripes around it the self-destruction button?
Also, are the standards higher for civil aircraft pilot compare to military pilots?
>>554187871
Lol that made me laugh
I love this video of them in action there's an apache in this one too pulling a gangbang
www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzTdzyU61EM
>>554199491
Forgot pic, again.
>>554199104
more a-10 because it kills tanks and stuff
>>554178981
SUB HUNTER WUUUUUT
>>554199514
I'm actually not sure what that does... Not fuel dump as thats located on the fuel panel on the overhead. Not fire bottle discharge or RAT extension... no fucking idea.
The standards are completely different. I would say both groups of pilots excel at their jobs equally well. They just both do completely different shit.
i love A-10 warthog ugly and perfect.
"nose art", an early form of fapability.
>>554199624
sure why not
>>554199916
Dude, you're crazy. The warthog is so pretty, at least in my eyes.
>>554199916
Sadly, due to its poor aerodynamics, it's utterly worthless in a dogfight and is primarily used as a tank destroyer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQB4W8C0rZI
This guy knows his shit but what is your opinion on F-35?
>>554200221
Its still in service since the US hasn't been engaged in a war with anyone with a capable air force
So it doesn't need to worry about dogfights right now
>>554200206
im joking its a beautiful machine built around a big fucking gun and i love it.
>>554200221
exactly it has one purpose. ground support and it excels in that area
>>554200552
haha, well i said before that the blackbird was over engineered. But atleast it worked, and was engineered to a specific purpose. The f35 is the definition of over engineering.
Best fighter in WWI
Fokker D.VII
>>554200221
It was never designed to go 1v1 with a fighter.
>>554178981
Ha
Check it out nigs I've been inside this fucker
>>554200602
they are retiring it i think this year =(
>>554200713
fokker you!
>>554200656
If I was a towelhead the A-10 would scare the shit out of me I mean you're dead before you hear the gun
>>554201007
yes
pimpin.
>>554200764
In a war against another super power, it'd still end up in a dog fight, whether it was designed to or not.
>>554200656
Air support to ground troops have had a lot of troubles in the past. Vietnam, North Korea, almost every war since they've been used, a large amount of them have been shot down.
>>554200602
>Its still in service
not for long
pic unrelated
gotta love the tiger meet paint jobs.
>>554201007
Seriously nobody posted stealth yet?
Wat? No Vulcan? Theres also one of these within walking distance of my house, and another about 12 miles away.
>>554178981
JAS Gripen
>>554201394
yeeeees this is my drugs
>>554201273
To add to this, that is why the AC-130 has been in use for nearly 70 years.
It's such a viable plane for what it's meant to be. Death from above.
>>554201507
you pervert
>>554201273
>In a war against another super power, it'd still end up in a dog fight, whether it was designed to or not.
Oh yeah, while the F15's, F16's, F18's, F22's and F35's go around destroying ground targets right? You know nothing about military staging and utilization of assets and you are a horrible person. I hope you feel bad about yourself.
>>554201439
>>554178981
I love these things for some reason
>>554201451
What is it with saab? The thing they design are so practical, yet always without any thought given aesthetic appeal.
>>554201507
Fap fap fap
>>554201783
>>554201591
Aha, and Some Lightnings. F-15 is faster ? Bitch please!
>>554201783
Dem sharp edges
dat shape
It is perfection.
>>554201679
>without any thought given aesthetic appeal
nigga please
>>554201579
> implying other super powers don't have fighter jets capable of low altitude engagements on enemy aircraft.
Only America follows the "don't engage under 1000 meter" rule.
You really believe a capable opponent wouldn't send aircraft to take down an advancing enemies air to ground support aircraft?
>>554201637
Built a screensaver with about 1400 of these.
>>554187547
There's a nice Colt at one of my home airports.
>>554194212
>taking this long the post the sexiest plane
>>554202048
>a capable opponent
such as...?
>>554189916
prefer>
>>554202000
>>554202000
C'mmon, comnpared to a super-hornet, they are all ugly.
>>554185702
As a sounthwest desert dweller. No. Everybody in my area has seen that shit doing it's high-banked turns, then screaming off into the sky before the sound barrier shakes the shit out of everything and scares small children and household pets.
One of the best aircraft during the cold war
>>554202291
Two Mitsubishi F-2's... I rikey
>>554202291
China and Russia both have a capable airforce.
They wouldn't win, but they do have a good amount of aircraft.
Let's get some Sukhois here
>>554202617
>>554202392
>super-hornet
>posts legacy hornet
wut
>>554202405
>>554185702
Speaking of Aurora, this video always gives me goosebumps...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCM4y6gOQdM
>>554189159
Loved watching these hotdogs zooming in nearly vertical to stuff a bomb in the exact spot you wanted it.....then shove back the canopy and wave to you as they went off for another pass. The devils wore long neck scarves.
>>554202806
>>554202787
oh psh, fine super hornet inbound.
>>554202919
Forgot to include a pic.
>>554186530
With enough thrust, you can make a brick fly. In fact, I think that's the main philosophy behind Soviet aerospace design.
>>554181840
>>554182448
>>554182843
>>554184835
>>554184901
>>554185523
>>554190027
>>554195620
>so much mad
After the Cold War, it was proven in files taken by Soviet defector Valery Mitrokhin (google "Mitrokhin Archive") that the Russians had a spy at Avro Canada in the 50s and they had indeed stolen blueprints for the Arrow, which later influenced the design for the Mig-25.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix0Izx-6Ycw
You guys remember this?
Mmm the new helmet for the f-35 lighting 2
>>554203656
had so much potential but sucks cock. like all russian crap.
>>554189420
You made a mistake and inadvertently posted a sadly inferior spitfire instead of a P51 Mustang. you should check your images folder.
cool bread. tiem for dinners.
>>554203808
These helmets are linked to cameras all over the plane so they could they have a full view of the sky
>>554204008
ain't no time for dinners when ders a cool bread
>>554204105
cool breads is image limit
>>554191612
you're welcome for not having to learn German when we rescued you from the Nazis. British 'organization'. Dunkirk.
It was our privilege.
Ask a military pilot anything.
>>554204540
Why do my balls itch
>>554204295
day time bombing raids was a huge loss of life with little results.
My grandfather was a navigator with the damnbusters squadron. He did say that he felt sorry for the poor buggers flying off in the daylight.
>>554204759
Some form of external stimuli has probably landed on your balls' skin, rubbing back and forth on the surface layer, making the receptors of the dermis of the skin irritated, sending itching signals to your cerebral cortex.
>>554184907
mustang so fucking sexy.
love that engine sound, those lines, and the scoop.
>>554204540
Have you have got to test any prototypes?