Why are feminists so fucking stupid /b/?

>>528810197
because they're feminists and they degrade themselves to argue with people on reddit, and they are even beating them

>>528810372
no it's because feminism is for the best you pig, men have had it easy too fucking long

File: 1363795851244.png (432KB, 1640x2368px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1640x2368px

Anit feminist thread gooooo

>>528811025
fuck off back to reddit whore

File: 1389577140738.gif (780KB, 325x203px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 325x203px

>>528811025

File: 1362728791477.jpg (88KB, 1271x519px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 1271x519px

>>528811326

>>528811228
>528811228

This is what I mean, men these days don't have respect

>>528811585
please be a troll.... please

>>528810930

Lazy nigger. He could have had the education if he wanted to. It's his own fault.

>>528811106
Why isn't this just spread everywhere?

>>528812625
he was taken out of school because some vagina toy called rape, did you even fucking read the picture shite brains?

File: 1389994495176.jpg (356KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1600x1200px

>>528811025

File: 1390259395004.jpg (60KB, 407x405px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 407x405px

>>528811585
No its just we have no respect for feminazis

File: 1389924861166.jpg (148KB, 750x561px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 750x561px

>>528811106
ROTFLMAO tell it like it is /b/roe.

File: comfortable.jpg (22KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 350x350px

>>528811025

>>528817089
oh wow this is a real kickstarter!

>>528817089
This guy is asking for trouble going against femenists with his actual name...

File: (2MB, px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, px

>>528811025
You're right. Men have life too easy. Women should be the ones conscripted and forced to fight in armies while the men stay home and cheat, and blow all the woman's money.

>>528817089

Yet another man who thinks it's funny to take the piss out of women wanting equality...

File: attachment.jpg (68KB, 391x500px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 391x500px

Just for you OP. (Pic very related.)

They're feminists BECAUSE they're stupid

File: 1332707020678_8615802.png (69KB, 420x294px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 420x294px

>>528817985

>>528817725
you have the same chance as being killed by your girlfriend wife...

Given average behaviors... most men are saints

File: 1389925285093.jpg (358KB, 742x600px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 742x600px

>>528818049

>>528811585
I-I-i respect you my l-lady.

All the men on here posting pictures and shit are proof that feminism is winning.

YOU'RE ALL SCARED

>>528817089

WHY ARE WE NOT BACKING THIS?

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1114752236/lemenist-project

>>528817985
>implying they don't already have equality, and now simply want all the benefits other people have to work for, risk-free, and without any effort, because "I have a vagina!"

File: 2134.jpg (56KB, 347x347px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 347x347px

>>528818260
No we just don't need uppity whores for anything not while hookers are so cheap. Now get back in the kitchen and make me a sammich, or get a real job and GTFO..

There's this law since 1996, the Violence Against Women Act. It expressly forbids anything that anyone with an imagination could consider domestic violence. Influence her religious beliefs? Felony. Force her to have kids, or prevent her from having kids if she's retarded and wants them? Felony. Withholding money from her, even if the reason is that the checking account is overdrawn? Felony.

There is this law since 1964, the Civil Rights Act, specifically title VII, that prohibits workplace discrimination, including making hire/fire decisions based on among other things gender.

Therefore, there is no need for a feminist movement. In the US, women are protected. They are fucking covered.

File: snip-the-tip.png (592KB, 1024x943px) Image search: [Google]

592KB, 1024x943px

Why haven't you had your woman's clit removed, /b/?

File: snip-the-tip2.png (693KB, 1024x943px) Image search: [Google]

693KB, 1024x943px

It's for her health, and society's benefit.

File: snip-the-tip4.png (496KB, 1024x943px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 1024x943px

Women naturally cannot control themselves, and need guidance!

>>528818358
Make a good thread about it, /b/ and /v/ can help big time with this, I'm sick that all men in videogames are big buff heroes. I cry every night about it.

File: snip-the-tip5.png (527KB, 1024x943px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1024x943px

So why don't you help them out? Encourage them to have their clits removed, today!

File: snip-the-tip6.png (684KB, 1024x943px) Image search: [Google]

684KB, 1024x943px

Even moms know the benefit! It gives them security knowing their young daughter won't sleep around.

File: snip-the-tip7.png (593KB, 1024x943px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 1024x943px

So come on, /b/! Hop on the bandwagon!

File: 445784-4_57916_44578_1.jpg (145KB, 750x600px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 750x600px

You sound like my brothers lazy useless wife. She cant cook, cant clean, wont care for her child, wont work, lived with me rent free for 2 years and did nothing till I threw her out. Now she whores herself out to everyone to live and my brother got his kid. What did she get nothing Good riddance.

File: snip-the-tip8.png (558KB, 1024x943px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 1024x943px

Remove those clits!

File: jailtime for criticizing cunts.jpg (406KB, 550x1238px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 550x1238px

>>528818586
But MUH FEELINS!!!!!!
Men shouldn't be allowed to say mean things to me, or tell me I'm wrong! Ever! It should be illegal!

>>528818985
oh dear god that is so good
this should be the next thing

File: 1386350288759.png (28KB, 1322x219px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 1322x219px

>>528811025

You can leave now.

Let me help you ma'am
>I walk over to the femanon
>delicately place right hand on her left shoulder while placing left hand in hers, gently escorting her out.
>The fear washes over her face like waves on a beach of what I'm about to do
>She takes a deep breath, panick begins to set in.
>I slowly, meaninfully reach for the door.
>My hand reaches the door knob
>Her knees are about to buckle
>My penis goes Super Sayain
>The other men in the room stare, sweat dripping from their brow.
>I open the door
>It is so quiet you can hear a fly fart
>All the other men begin to violently unleash their sperm onto nearby walls
>AND WITH ONE SWIFT MOTION I WHISPER IN HER EAR....It was my privilege ma'am

File: 9455-Atheist_Motivational(...).jpg (26KB, 400x320px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x320px

Welcome to equal rights OP. Now that we are treating you like a man, go get a job and pay for all my stuff while I sit home and watch tv, and bang the neighbor chick.

>>528818358
I agree, any /b/ros us pro spreading this giant?

File: goddammit.jpg (6KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 275x183px

from a girls point of view,

i hope guys dont think all women are this fucking ridiculously stupid.

feminists have made me wish i wasn't female. Its a shame you cant choose your gender.

>>528819545
but you can't bang the neighbor chick. thanks to equal rights, SHE's out working today too.

This is why /b/ is better than reddit

File: 1390255236997.jpg (66KB, 839x545px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 839x545px

>>528820413
Not all just most.

>>528820736
femanon again

i can agree with that

>>528821259
i know this is a troll but still
>femanon
>contradicting the fact of being anonymous by stating gender

>>528818207
This is stupid.
>>528818020
This is stupid.
>>528817725
This is stupid.
>>528818586
This is stupid.
>>528819545
This is stupid.

There's a difference between being anti-feminist and being anti-women.

I don't know why you guys are so against feminism. I want equallity. I want to see some goddamn mixed gender UFC matches!

File: 1390181350887.jpg (5KB, 250x231px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 250x231px

>>528821726

You cannot be serious. Dana would get a shit load of lawsuits for even considering it.

File: 1368917304846.png (162KB, 802x873px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 802x873px

I've donated, who else is with me, even if it is just spreading the word and spaming the link in /b/

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1114752236/lemenist-project

File: 1384061654946.gif (529KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

529KB, 625x626px

>>528821726

>>528821886
Why would he, if the women got consent to fight the men there would be now lawsuits especially in a free male privilege society

File: 1389925522666.jpg (24KB, 272x300px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 272x300px

>>528821726
Then get a job or make yourself useful and stop being a feminist. If you want to be equal do something to deserve it.

>>528821484
not troll

just wanted you guys to know that it is possible for females to be anti feminist..

i know it sounds ridiculous.

File: huh.gif (615KB, 500x348px) Image search: [Google]

615KB, 500x348px

>>528821726
>"We want equality!"
>demand right to become front-line infantry
>congress agrees
>door now open to women
>women fail basic entry-level PT tests
>cry
>demand standards be lowered to mend bruised vagina ego
"EQUALITY!"

>>528822610
Did they really demand right to become front-line infantry, because if so that should be praised, it's a step in the right direction.

>>528821726

Because femenism isn't about equality, at least not the radical kind we are railing against. It's about transferring perceived "male privilege" to themselves and dominating men.

If this strain of feminism were about equality then they would be fighting for equal punishment, equality in custody cases, and female-male alimony. They aren't, so it isn't about equality.

Basically we don't have a problem with equality as long as it comes with equal accountability.

File: 1389881777889.gif (97KB, 350x283px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 350x283px

>>528822289
Sounds like woman logic to me.

>>528822762
Actually no. Some feminists complained about the door being closed to women, so that was changed. Women aren't exactly tripping over themselves to become infantry.

File: Typical MRA.png (96KB, 406x572px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 406x572px

ITT

>>528822773
so because i'm a girl, you think i want to be?

if you were forced to be female i'm sure you'd hate it too

File: 1390258757560.jpg (36KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x375px

>>528822762
I'm sure they will be so proud when the enemy gang rapes them till their squad gives up the battle plan.

>>528811106
Fucking hell that was great

Daily reminder that not all feminists are retards and that men's rights activists are fedoras

>>528823241
>in muzzie country
>infantry unit comes under fire
>female "soldier" captured
>gets raped, because no one outside of the West gives a fuck about feminism
>feminists/women activists get on TV and shriek
>"OMG WHY DIDNT THE MILITARY DO MORE TO PROTECT THIS PROUD WOMYN!!!!!!"

You fucking wait and see if that doesn't happen. It happened when that pogue chick got nabbed in Iraq during the invasion. Feminazis didn't blame the Arabs, they blamed the military.

File: FemalePrivledge.jpg (97KB, 765x990px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 765x990px

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so-SG2TjaEk
Educate yourself

>>528823709

Come on /b/ros!!

File: 62201062704PM_demotivatio(...).jpg (17KB, 400x320px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 400x320px

>>528823536
That's because as has been said feminists don't want equality they want role reversal. A thing that will never happen. Their words are all noise and thunder signifying nothing.

File: femnists.gif (705KB, 245x196px) Image search: [Google]

705KB, 245x196px

>>528823417
>You shouldn't go by stereotypes. Now listen to my stereotyping!

>>528822872
Who cares, you guys complain about them not petitioning for equal responsibilities instead of equal rights. Well this is more towards equal responsibilities, take that into account.

Feminist are the worst kind of being on this planet. Into the shit pit it goes.

>>528823836
Wtf is role reversal?

File: 1390492708840.jpg (45KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x500px

Pic says it all.

>>528823813
8/10, did laugh.

If I wasn't such a poor fag I would help this brah

>>528823985
They want to oppress men as they feel they were oppressed.

My professor in speech class is a feminist. I am irrate brethren

File: faggots.jpg (5KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 183x275px

its funny that sites like this are one of the reasons feminists exist.

by hating on feminism and women, you're causing more feminism.

is it just me who sees this?

>>528824734
Don't repeat this in class the bitch will fail you. Never trust a feminist. They change loyalty like they change boyfriends or girlfriends.

>>528824856
And feminism creates even more hate. See the cycle?

>>528823836
They don't want role reversal. They want female privilege. They want everything delivered at their feet, work/labor-free, because they were born with a vagina. They think that because they have a damp slit they shouldn't have to work or do anything productive, should never have their views challenged, should never be told they're wrong, should never have any social interaction unless they deem it to be absolutely necessary, and that anyone who is not like them should worship their very existence. Meanwhile, they should also have absolute social mobility and be able to live/do/be anything at any time, regardless of education or merit, and that all reproductive decisions should be left to them forever.

And all of this stems from the fact they were treated as "princesses" growing up.

Feminism is nothing but privileged suburbanite women hitting adulthood and realizing the world will not kowtow to them. And instead of adjusting to this new reality, they freak out with impotent anger and rage because there's no longer any magical omnipotent patriarchal figure (their father) giving them everything they want for free, anymore. So now that there's no more free ride from daddy, they look at all male members of society and say "I want more free stuff!! Now!!!!!"

She's openly expresses her feminist viewpoints in class.

File: Obama_Tits_or_GTFO-s292x2(...).jpg (18KB, 292x219px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 292x219px

>>528824856
Then I guess there is no answer since I and many I know will not submit to feminist ideas. So that said.

>>528825021
but think about it, where did feminism come from?

>>528823882
You missed the point, like all feminists do.

They weren't mad about being NOT being infantry. They were mad about the door being closed to them. Now that it's open, barely any of them are going through. They hated an idea, rather than the practical reality of actually serving, refusing to put their money where their mouth is.

And of the few that DID try to get in, almost all of them failed. They couldn't pass the PT tests that any fat asshole redneck from middle-of-nowhere USA could pass, once again proving men and women are not biologically equal and that feminists should shut the fuck up. But instead of shutting the fuck up, they're now demanding PT scoring for women be LOWERED so that more of them can get into infantry.

It's not about them actually working and achieving that goal. It's about the bar being lowered so they can pretend they accomplished something when they fucking didn't. And all the regular infantry units out there are going to have to eventually put up with sniveling whining angry little women who can barely lift their own rifle, because they want to feel like special snowflakes. People are going to die because of feminism.

File: more monies.png (166KB, 923x760px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 923x760px

>>528823813
it's working! he is getting backers!!!

File: 1388844272335.jpg (10KB, 244x184px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 244x184px

>>528811025
What? So it's now perfectly okay to treat them like shit? What tolerant and and enlightened world you live in.

File: GetAttachment21.jpg (16KB, 219x149px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 219x149px

>>528825365
Write an anonyms written complaint to the principal.

>>528818260
>>528821525
Not once on this post have I seen a well put together argument supporting feminism, just talking shit, which is exactly our point, isn't it?

>>528824856
No one gave two shits about feminism on 4chan until feminists started attacking video games. Then they had the audacity of attacking 4chan itself after being made fun of for it.

You can pretend you're winning all you want, but the fact of the matter is no one cared about feminism up until recently. Now even fucking Reddit, the liberal Mecca of the internet, hates feminists.

In your misguided crusade, you've created a whole new generation of enemies that would have otherwise been content to ignore you.

>>528825179
if they want everything handed to them by men, why would they act like such bitches to men and hate them?

or am i missing the point here

>>528823236
There's plenty of women who love being women, sounds like a personal problem to me, bitch

>>528825910
Because they see men as withholding "things" from them.

Ie:
Womyn don't get good jobs because PATRIARCHY.
Womyn get paid less because PATRIARCHY.
Womyn don't hold political offices because PATRIARCHY.

Daddy isn't around to give them free stuff anymore, and so now they want free stuff from YOU.

File: funny_girls_demotivationa(...).jpg (27KB, 520x395px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 520x395px

>>528825772
Shhhhhh.........Don't let them in on the joke we are all laughing at the woman logic. Ah, crap! I gave it away.

>>528824149
Same, I'm in debt.

>>528826095
surely they cant just expect to get whatever they want by being cunts about it.

i just dont get it

>>528826769

They just fall back on their feminism if people give good logic against them... they really are delusional

>>528825595
You're complaining about women being in the military, I'm sorry, you have no point so please STFU. I didn't even read past the second part.

Hurr durr, these women complained that they weren't allowed to die for their country, hurr durr, evil feminists.
The bar having to be lowered or not lowered is a different topic. But the original post I was responding to was in the format of "first they X, now they even Y" which somehow implies that X is bad. X in this case was them arguing that they weren't allowed to join infantry. Are you agreeing with him that feminists should've never complained about not being able to join the infantry?
PS, don't imply I'm a feminist you scumbag.

>>528826889
i mean i dont give a fuck if they want to be stupid cunts and make themselves look like idiots.

the thing i hate is how they give men the impression that all women agree with them.

File: 1390322899027.jpg (19KB, 215x260px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 215x260px

>>528826769
Never waste your time trying to comprehend a feminist mind, simply turn around walk away and know some day they will be lesbians or hookers since no man will put up with them.

>>528825772
I'm this guy.
>>528821525
I don't support feminism, I'm against it. I'm also against woman hating masked as anti-feminism. Get it?

>>528827087
i thought they were all already lesbians

>>528827070
Hahahahahaha, didn't read the second part! Totally not understanding!

No on needs to imply feminist, you did it for us

>>528824252
But that's not role reversal, and that's not even something men do nowadays.

File: feminism1.jpg (43KB, 500x400px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x400px

>>528827285
Not all some are just bitches that cant get a man to listen to their lunacy.

>>528827317
I didn't read it because you already had a false premise, which was that somehow them being mad that the closed door to being infantry wasn't a bad thing. Why should I listen to the rest of your argument when that's completely hypocritical bullshit.
>complain about women not joining the military
>women fight to join the military
>complain about women joining the military
See son, that's just some infuriating shit. Forget about feminism and male rights, when you're anti-logic and change goal posts then I'm not on your team.

>>528820413
Well, with the power of modern medical technology, NOW YOU CAN.

>>528821525
There is a difference between a cancer filed, bloated hippo and you. The difference being the hippo has more brains than you. Fuck feminism and their stupid fucking beliefs.

And the fucking captcha: faggeot feminism

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1114752236/lemenist-project

Now at £100

It's happening!

File: feministmemeslut.jpg (47KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 640x480px

>>528828000
We keep giving people equal rights they keep asking for more, sooner or later they try to take power and control us. Because the above poster was correct no one wants equal rights or treatment they just want to change the rules to make life easy on them and hard on everyone else. I say fuck them all if that's the way it is let them suffer.

>>528828046
Wasn't me that wrote it, and why I laugh is becaus you h e no idea what that post says because you didn't read all of it, maybe you should read all of that before you get auto pissed because someone has different views than you, mam

File: (1MB, px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, px

>>528828538
this.

pic related

File: srs.jpg (78KB, 373x400px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 373x400px

>>528827070
>You're complaining about women being in the military, I'm sorry, you have no point so please STFU
What a commanding counter-argument.

Feminists demand the door be opened.
Then it is.
Barely any women apply.
Those that do overwhelmingly fail.
Feminists demand bar be lowered to preserve special feelings.
If it is, unfit female soldiers will join the infantry and get people killed.

It's not that hard to understand.

>don't imply I'm a feminist
I don't have to. Given your lack of logic and completely crazy rambling response, it's painfully obvious you are.

>>528823241
>women in front line
>fighting arabs from uglyasfuckistan
>entire squad gets captured
>rape.jpg
>feminazis screaming
>"We will fight this war ourselves, we dont need help from men."
>All feminazis then bring their rape whistles to their mouths and blow
>Squad hears this call
>All of their vaginas start swelling
>Arabs flipping their shit
>The vagina flaps grow bigger until they are like extra legs
>DoctorOctopussy.wtf
>The vagina flaps gather all of the arabs together
>hold them there
>Squad starts screeching pro-women rights and stupid banter
>Arabs heads explode from the sheer stupidity
>Squad is ok, back in Amerifuck
>Man goes to congragulate
>All women retreat
>Man follows them home
>Fumbling with keys
>Man picks them up
>"Let me get that for you"
>Women starts crying, begging for him to stop.
>Opens the door
>"Why did you do that?"
>"It was my privilege."

>>528810197
Why is not as important as discovering how to piss them off in the most amusing fashion.

There are thousands of flavours of stupid and they're all delicious when appreciated properly.

File: fm8.jpg (35KB, 407x405px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 407x405px

Fuck feminists.

File: h8EWAT7B0415.jpg (20KB, 404x303px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 404x303px

>>528829278

>>528825525
The need to get everything they want without ever working for it.

>>528828595
I can guess, some shit about them lowering the military standards being bad? At the same time while telling me "I don't get the point", when my argument has nothing to do with the lowering of military standards. You don't get the point, retard.
I read the rest of the argument, out of all the stupid terrible shit that feminism does, you pick the least damaging to society. Women should join the military, just because the way they don't do it is perfect doesn't mean it isn't valuable.
You guys fight about women not dieing for their countries while expecting the same amount of respect, which is completely understandable. But then you start fight about them dieing for their countries, and that's where it stops being logical.

File: 1355354090066.jpg (90KB, 356x264px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 356x264px

>>528829278

>>528826175
source?

File: que.jpg (2KB, 268x188px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 268x188px

>>528829767
oh i thought they were bitching because they wanted to work for it..

getting mens jobs and independence an that shit whatever

>>528829813
I bet your fat

>>528829019
Exactly.
>Feminists demand the door be opened to the military
A couple of years ago, wasn't this the big argument, that feminists never fight for responsibilities like joining the military? This is a complete 180. So given your tendency to be a hypocrit, you're more of a feminist than me.

The only people unfit female soldiers will get killed by being unfit is themselves.

>>528830306
I actually am. You're* though

>>528830365
first rule in military, you fight for your fellow soldier. You leave no man behind.
If a girl can't drag 90KG of a male on her shoulders to safety, how is she going to save her fellow soldier.

>>528830263
Nah, that's just a clever ruse.

File: attachment5567.png (256KB, 650x520px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 650x520px

>>528830245
Had it for years couldn't tell you try a reverse image search.

>>528830570
She's not, and she shouldn't be relied on, and she will probably get killed, injured and raped. And then she'll have my respect just like any other soldier who was killed or traumatized on the battlefield for either being too weak or in the wrong situation.

>>528830523
I wasn't finished.

I bet your fat oozes out of your pants.

Gosh do all feminists interrupt! I bet you'll only read the first line though.

File: fm13.jpg (83KB, 400x500px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 400x500px

>>528830365
Wrong an unfit soldier can take down a whole squad. Trust me I served eight years in two wars. More than once some one not doing their part killed a squad.

>>528830570
Oh, and the other thing, more combatants on your side (such as when women are in the military) = higher chance of victory for you. You don't pick a fighting strategy and then pick the people who are good at that strategy for your military, you find the people who are willing to die for their country and then figure out the best way to keep them alive.

>>528831064
That's not the unfit soldier's fault, that's the fault of having a stupid strategy. Did you all go in trying to save them knowing that this would kill the rest of your squad?

File: Screen shot 2014-01-24 at(...).png (145KB, 437x348px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 437x348px

>>528830696
but surely they already get off easy without being bitches..

guys work so hard to get hot girls with their piles of cash.. so men are basically letting chicks get off easy because they dont look for an intelligent woman with her own money, they just look at how hot she is.. so bitches dont think they need to do shit for themselves. they just think about making themselves look hot so rich faggots fall for them..

>>528829813
No one says women should not be in the military. They just shouldn't be in any grunt capacity. They're overweight, under-trained, under disciplined, and their personalities aren't broken down in BCT like male recruits are. Again, because of female vagina privilege. While the men are doing night marches, the girls barracks is tee-heeing around in their underwear taking selfies for Facebook.

At the end of the day, who is capable of marching ten miles uphill in 120 degree weather with 100lbs of shit on their back, and then fight a 48-hour battle with no sleep or food? Spoilers: It's not fucking women.

And yes, lowering standards is probably the worst, most crippling change you can make to the military. If you don't think so you're a fat retard. No grunt wants a 200lb suburbanite entitled blob in their squad who can't even haul their own gear just so some twinkle twat stateside can feel special and make Tumblr macros about it. Putting females in with the infantry is a fucking terrible idea, and even female soldiers know it.

File: 567567856789.jpg (13KB, 255x198px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 255x198px

>>528831513
Tell that to the other people that died because their teammate was unfit, while you at it tell the dead men's families. Its a soldier's job to be fit for duty if he is not he is a disgrace to his unit and a liability.

File: 1361285329567.png (298KB, 334x802px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 334x802px

>>528810197

>>528831293
Youre not really familiar with tactics, are oyu

>>528830365
Jesus christ you're retarded. No one operates independently in today's military. Everyone works as a team. When you have a team member PHYSICALLY INCAPABLE OF DOING HER PART, it endangers the whole team.

What happens if a squad takes shrapnel, and the only one left standing is Private Crazycooch? Is she going to be able to drag them out of fire to a waiting pararescue team? Of fucking course not.

Why do you think so many women fail out of infantry? Because they can't do basic shit like that. Lowering the standards will only make it worse. You're an absolute moron if you can't grasp that.

File: 1316800491628.jpg (93KB, 558x600px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 558x600px

>>528823605
Why have I never seen this channel before.

Captcha: dundedo vegan

>>528830924
So if five soldiers are injured and the sixth soldier is a female, it's better for ALL of them to die just to get rid of that one female?

Why not just have no female in the team to begin with and have the whole team be saved?

>>528831749
You can't blame women for not being willing to die for their country, then blame them for willing to die for their country. And turning away people based on their capabilities isn't a good idea, unless they're actively going to cripple the batallion (like being an alcoholic or kleptomaniac) it's just stupid.
If you've ever agreed to that "never forced to die" (and I know you have) for your country pic, but this is your position then you're just not giving women any chance of being respected. I'm sorry, I'm anti-feminist, but my position isn't women are pieces of shit no matter what they do. That's yours.

>>528818490
Is that a child?

File: 1390254748503.jpg (36KB, 640x595px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x595px

>>528832264
She's a retarded spoiled feminist. She doesn't think things through just acts on emotion and demands things that are uncalled for.

>>528832308
perry blake check?

>>528810197
what are you doing on reddit? go back to that cancerous place and dont comeback cancer

File: beer-vs-girl-girl-bra-cle(...).jpg (59KB, 640x520px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 640x520px

>>528832571
Have you ever tried to carry a 200lb man while being shot at? I am willing to bet the answer is no. A woman is in most cases not physically capable of doing so. Now please go back to reddit your ignorance is stinking up the joint.

File: 1358107094391.jpg (93KB, 355x461px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 355x461px

>>528831293
>Oh, and the other thing, more combatants on your side (such as when women are in the military) = higher chance of victory for you.

Dear fucking god. You know absolutely nothing about the military. It's not World War 1 anymore. No one is throwing waves of conscripts into battle.

Today's military is more expensive, more capable, and more specialized. Smaller, tighter, more efficient. Most militaries, INCLUDING the United States, are actually shedding soldiers. We're at 1.7 million right now and that number is going to drop. We only want the best to fill the ranks, not the lowest common denominator. There's actually waiting periods to get in, now. You can actually be disqualified for various reasons. It's not an open door where all they give a shit about is numbers.

Now that being said, why the FUCK would we want worthless females to fill the ranks when you can have strong, college-educated men do the job that women are physically incapable of doing?

>>528832303
>>528832264
>>528831847
Change your fucking tactics, LEARN TO USE WHAT YOU HAVE PROPERLY. I don't care if it was "go in after every soldier" for 1000s of years. More people in the military = higher chance of winning. If they want to die, how about you don't stand in their fucking way?
Make all female batallions, don't go in to save somebody who died because they weren't able to do what everybody else could do.

>>528832571
I don't get what you're saying.

In the Royal Navy, overweight women are allowed to serve on board ships. This one woman had to sign a waiver stating that in the event of a hull breach/flood, she must wait last until everyone else had cleared the compartment because she was so fat she couldn't fit through the kidney hatch without compromising water tight integrity. When the shit hits the fan, you just know that fat bitch is gonna stampede through everyone, get stuck, and have everyone killed. Diversity.

>>528833290
>We only want the best to fill the ranks, not the lowest common denominator. There's actually waiting periods to get in, now. You can actually be disqualified for various reasons. It's not an open door where all they give a shit about is numbers.
Yeah, why? That's retarded. Give me 1000 females vs 100 men any day. Numbers do win fights, and there's more than one way to win a fight than "pull something 90kg".

File: demfeels.png (133KB, 511x511px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 511x511px

>>528817980
>tfw you'll never be as big as the guy in the 2nd picture

Cap: pirperf perfection

>>528833391
No, I don't know that. Judging someone before they do something is the exact definition of prejudice.

File: 1390401460904.jpg (20KB, 310x310px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 310x310px

>>528833294
Sorry I prefer to live rather than have teammate who will get me or themselves killed. I guess I am just heartless, you know the whole not wanting to die or watch my friends die. To make some stupid cunt feel better about herself.

>>528833391
>she was so fat she couldn't fit through the kidney hatch without compromising water tight integrity
That's fucking bullshit. Unless she's some kind of super genius, they can find someone else to do her job and kick her ass of the ship.

>>528817980
I completely missed this picture, this is what you guys want. This is what you're getting, but you're still complaining.

>>528833391
ROTFLMAO nice.

>>528832596
You're dodging and dodging and dodging and continuously refusing to address the central point:

Why should anyone let women join the infantry when they're physically incapable of being an infantryman?
Why should the standards be lowered to let women into the infantry when all that will amount to is more dead soldiers?

You can pretend to be "anti-feminist", but when you say shit like
>but this is your position then you're just not giving women any chance of being respected
It's obvious you're a retarded feminist. Not only do you NOT address the central points being stated, but you're trying to attack me for pointing out the reasons why its a bad idea to lower the standards.

Your argument is
>"The standards should be lowered so females can get in and die, and if you disagree you disrespect womyn!!!!"

So basically, for every 30 men that get through training, there'll be one female applicant. You want that female applicant to get in NOT because she passed the PT standards that the men were held to, but because she has a vagina. And you think this is a good idea out of a fucking convoluted belief that this will somehow be a good thing because it will get feminists killed.

Newsflash: There's not going to be a Womyn's Battalion. These fat under-trained dykes will be put in with the men that actually passed their training and didn't get shoed-in due to their genitals, and will then promptly get those men killed because she won't have any idea what the fuck she's doing, nor will she be capable of doing any of it even if she knew.

Stuff like this:
>>528833163
Absolutely proves to me you have no idea what you're fucking talking about.
Wounded are DRAGGED. Not CARRIED. Women get drummed out of infantry because they can't even fucking DRAG A GUY.

I don't know why they are, but they are

>>528833294
>More people in the military = higher chance of winning
No. It's better to have good soldiers than to have a lot of soldiers. Women can be good soldiers, but they just have to work harder to get to the same fitness standard as men.

>>528834176
She'll only get you killed if you treat her differently from the rest of the batallion. She's just going to get herself killed, and that's respectable.

File: facecover.jpg (63KB, 537x796px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 537x796px

>>528834123
Some times prejudice is not prejudice its fact.

File: 1389840952744.jpg (28KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 600x600px

>>528834495
No she will get me killed because she lacks the ability to physically do what I do. Which means she has no place in combat.

>>528834438
There's not going to be more dead soldiers because there will be more soldiers. More soldiers = more chances of survival for any one of those soldiers. You don't seem to understand that the way things are done take into the account the amount of infantry and their capabilities, given that there are 1000 soldiers, the demands for them are X. Given that there are 2000 soldiers, the demands for them are Y. You think the military is lowering the standards knowing this will get MORE people killed? That's exactly what the military is for, it's to get people not killed.
>>528833163
And this guy, isn't me.
>>528834487
You know how tae-kwan-do was invented? It was a civillian martial art for uprising, they purposely trained in high-kicks because they didn't have horses and the kicks were meant to kick soldiers off horses. You use what you have because warfare is the most flexible thing there is, and no matter how small or weak you are, what seperates you is your will to fight and creativity not your ability to fit rigid standards.

>>528833294
>Change your fucking tactics,
And here's the crux of the feminist argument. Here's why you are dangerous.
You want the ENTIRE FUCKING MILITARY to change the way it operates, disregarding centuries of accumulated know-how and field-expertise, in order to make yourself and a token few others feel better about your gender, and in the process getting thousands of people needlessly killed. Just more blood sacrifice upon the altar of "equality", I guess.

Women are not biologically equal to men. They never have been. They never will be. The reason women fail entry into the infantry is because they are physically weaker. No amount of PC bullshit is going to change biology. I suggest you deal with it.

>>528833783
>Numbers do win fights
Not joking, not being sarcastic here. You are actually retarded.

File: (2MB, px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, px

>>528835380
>there's not going to be more dead soldiers because there will be more soldiers.

What the actual fuck? Does down-syndrome hurt?

File: 1366807903993.jpg (32KB, 188x454px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 188x454px

>>528834495
>She'll only get you killed if you treat her differently from the rest of the batallion.
I'm laughing so fucking hard right now.

>The key to success on the battlefield is MUH FEELINS!

>>528834495
We should stop discriminating against stupid people
>let people with IQs of <50 become astronauts
>let them go into a shuttle with other people
>let them inevitably do their job wrong, because they AREN'T RIGHT for it
>let them get everyone in the shuttle killed because they made a mistake
>these deaths are justified because they were done in the name of equality
This is what you're saying.

File: 5678967895678.jpg (10KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 275x183px

>>528835380
Nope Im not him.

>>528834936
Ok, and how will that get you killed, because she can't pull YOU out of the line of fire? That's you getting you killed, not her getting you killed. Or because you chose to run back to save her because she's too slow to get out of the line of fire in a reasonable amount of time? Again, that's YOU getting YOU killed. That she spots the enemy faster because she's simply looking in another direction, that she's carrying extra ammo so when you run out she can give you more, that she can call for a medic when you get hit? That's her saving your life.

>>528835380
>There's not going to be more dead soldiers because there will be more soldiers.
I give up. You're beyond redemption. You've literally disregarded logic and gone full galactic-retard.

Go scream at phallic symbols in parking lots.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gzdf4V7Cf_M

>>528835380
Because a quadriplegic could make a good soldier if he really wanted to be?
We can't just give every random fuck who wants to kill foreigners a place in the military. There needs to be a set of standards to ensure some kind of quality control.

File: (2MB, px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, px

>>528835740

>>528834495
first, it is not respectable going to fight only to die, it's the same as suicide...
second, even if a men don't treat she differently from other soldier when in action he will abid by he's instinct (protect those who are fighting with him or run) and when this happens he will protect the female first or more than the others, because it's our nature we are programed to do this by nature, and has be seen exemples if soldiers that where teammed with females and become useless when the female is killed, such is the instinct psicology.
and I know someone will rage about this...
women should be in the military? sere, if they can do what is necessary to be a military.
should they be acepted if inapty? no, for the same reason anyone will not be acepted for a job he is not capable to do.

>>528835740
>she can't pull YOU out of the line of fire? That's you getting you killed

>grenade
>get knocked unconsious
>bleeding out fast
>teammate too weak to pull me to safety, leaves me behind
>oh well, it's my fault for not being a bulletproof supersoldier

File: arguing-with-retards.jpg (82KB, 696x606px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 696x606px

>>528835740
OMG please kill yourself, it may be the only redeemable thing you can do. PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DONT BREED. I would hate to see your retarded children on the news.

>>528835498
No, I want the military to change their tactics because if you're somehow losing more when you have more people. Then you really need to rethink wtf you're doing. Being physically weaker does not mean you will lose in a war. Having less people, more cowards, worse technology, and stupider strategy is what makes you lose in a war. This isn't UFC.
>>528835680
No, we shouldn't, but when there's another, better way to get the job done then you should do it that way. When you have more people working towards one goal, that goal should in theory be accomplished more efficiently.
>>528835558
I mean percentage wise, you're less likely to get shot when there are more people to notice if someone's a threat. You can clear areas faster. There's more backup in case 1 part of the system fails.
>>528835558
^Read that.

File: 1356389850227.jpg (115KB, 699x468px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 699x468px

>>528835740
>MUH BRAVE WIMMINZ DINT DO NUFFIN

Let's flip your logic. Let's say some dumbass female private gets shot by Muslims. All the male members of her squad are perfectly fine. She's screaming at them to save her life, but then they tell her they can't drag her to be medevaced because that would be touch-rape and would violate her rights as a stronk independent womyn. So she bleeds out and dies.

According to your logic, it would be her fault for being there and getting hit, not the men's fault for being unable to drag her to safety.

I assume you're okay with this.

>>528836563
You seem to be under the impression that there's some kind of shortage of soldiers. We aren't even making use of all the enlisted, able-bodied soldiers we have now. Why would we lower the entry standards so we can have a greater amount of less useful soldiers we don't even need?

File: 1366917032644.jpg (15KB, 184x184px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 184x184px

>>528836563
>I DON'T WANT THE MILITARY TO CHANGE THEIR TACTICS, I JUST WANT THE MILITARY TO CHANGE THEIR TACTICS

>>528836462
Not an argument.
>>528836456
How is her not being there at all a better option?
>>528835680
No, this isn't what I'm saying.
>>528836034
Can't read this much because there's too many people disagreeing with me.

File: 1390254503392.jpg (47KB, 432x600px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 432x600px

>>528836563
You are completely ignorant of what you speak, your words are hollow and fall on deaf ears. Go educate yourself on the points you wish to argue before posting here. Some times it is best to remain quiet and look stupid that to open ones mouth and remove all doubt. For you this is one of those times.

File: (1MB, px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, px

>>528836563
Quantity =/= quality. More people (some of which are biologically inferior) who can't preform up to set military standards are going to do nothing but cause confusion and casualties.

>>528837183
... I'm reading everything in the tread and finish the paga with like 1 or 2 new posts... cmon...

>>528815838
She didn't ask for it.

>>528837121
I never said this.
>>528837019
Why aren't we using all the able-bodied soldiers? It's not like there isn't shit to do.
>>528836848
I AM! Damn it, that's exactly it. If there's a line of fire, and it's 300 feet, and everyone else gets out alive because they could run 300 feet in 10 seconds. But that one soldier, who takes 18 seconds gets hit, let them die.

All of these complaints you guys have could easily be solved with an all female batallion.

>>528837183
>How is her not being there at all a better option?
The better option is to instead put one of the military's many available able-bodied soldiers in her place. If the weak woman gets in, she's going to get put on someone's squad, to the detriment of that squad. If she doesn't get in, then a good soldier will be put into that squad instead of her.

>>528811025
I completely agree and I'm a guy.

>>528836848
I'd be fine with that if that was what the woman was going to do. I'd rather be justifiably punished that punished for doing the right thing.

>>528837367
You don't have as many people to respond to, 90% of the posts are quoting me.
>>528837236
And when it comes to the military, quantity does = quality.

File: double-sex-standard.jpg (44KB, 480x466px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 480x466px

>>528837487

>>528837651
>It's not like there isn't shit to do.
Every military decision has to be carefully weighed for its financial and political consequences. The President won't just say "TERRORISM IN IRAN" and send the entire U.S. military force there, because a lot of other countries would not like such a show of force.
Name something you think our military should be doing.

>>528837728
Putting an able-bodied soldier where you need to be means taking an able-bodied soldier away from where able-bodied soldiers are needed. So yeah, maybe your mission might have a higher success rate, but it's at the cost of other missions and some things might not even be attempted because there's simply not enough man power.

>>528818490
Did that bitch on the left actually say that shit?

File: 1389924277474.jpg (258KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1000x750px

>>528837651
Right just what we need, a bunch of inferior soldiers with guns getting in trouble so we need to go rescue them from rapacious terrorists.

>>528836563
>if you're somehow losing more when you have more people. Then you really need to rethink wtf you're doing.
I realize you're probably a teenage girl, but I'll try to explain something to you in baby-terms so you can process it.

In every army on the planet Earth:
Quality > Quantity

Back during the Boxer Rebellion, the Chinese would regularly attack the foreigners with tens of thousands of imperial and irregular Chinese militia. The foreigners would often have less than 500 people with them, and most times less than 200. Despite the vast numerical advantage, the Chinese lost almost every single battle. During the Korean war, the South was overwhelmingly outnumbered and outmatched. Yet the North and their Chinese allies lost over a million and a half soldiers and militia, and oh yeah, lost the war.

Numbers mean fuck-all in war.

You speak of things like you know, when it's clear to anyone reading you know nothing. This is why we're not taking you seriously.`

>>528820419
then the mailwoman

>>528837781
ok then, how exactly you have it easy by being a man, I aways had this doubt and no one ever has told me this...

>>528811
You just called a dude a "pig" for his opinion, saying that men have had it " easy for to long". So you mean we have to suffer for your imagined slights? Your the rain feminism gets a bad rep. Shut up, do some fucking research before calling yourself a feminist. You're soilingthe name feminist.

File: schoolpic.jpg (15KB, 169x213px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 169x213px

>>528838236

>>528838106
>means taking an able-bodied soldier away from where able-bodied soldiers are needed
Do you realize that there are plenty of able-bodied soldiers not even serving right now because the government doesn't have shit for them to do? The military doesn't send a half-strength squad into a mission. If they need more soldiers, they'll have them called in.
Maybe your proposal would have merit when we start running out of soldiers, but until then, why not use the best we can?

>>528821726
that's fine.
I myself wouldn't mind unisex bathrooms

>>528838007
Figuring out ways to win wars with fewer casualties, searching and seizing more weapons from enemy combatants along with strategically useful areas, rebuilding more infrastructure in the countries we bombed the shit out of so that we don't create more future enemies.

>>528837651
You must be american. Anyone else would see the problem with sending 5000 soldiers into a foreign country instead of 500.

>>528837651
>all female batallion.
Which would never be deployed anywhere, because women are shit soldiers.

>>528837846
>everyone disagrees with me
That usually tells you something.

>>528838236
>Numbers mean fuck all in war
Please find me any military scholar or general who agrees with you. Just name a few.
>>528838483
That's administrative fault, I worked at a scrap factory. There was always shit to do, but half the people stood around. It's like that everywhere.

>>528838575
>Figuring out ways to win wars with fewer casualties
Do you think they aren't doing that? And anyway, that's not a soldier's job, military strategists do that.
> searching and seizing more weapons from enemy combatants along with strategically useful areas
We can't just dump our entire supply of soldiers into Iran. Like I said, that would be a bad political move.
>rebuilding more infrastructure in the countries we bombed the shit out of so that we don't create more future enemies.
Not really the military's job, and we can't babysit our former enemies any more than we already have.

>>528837651
Here is a piece of advice.
We have a board named /k/ - weapons. It's full of military personnel. Go there, start a thread asking for stories of actual combat or opinions on women in the military, whatever, just get informed before you state stuff about a field so vaste and complicated as military tactics.

>>528823605
>control over 60% of US wealth? I'm going to need a citation for that one,

>>528838575
>figure out ways to win wars with fewer casualties
>by using more soldiers

>>528838745
I disagree, if you need a soldier to do something it just come down to if he can do it in the best, I'm from a military force and have see women that are as good as men in many areas of expertise and can act as good as anyone in it.

>>528839202
>That's administrative fault
Doesn't matter who's fault it is, we still don't need the extra soldiers if they're shit.

>>528838845
I'd say most of the time, but not all the time. Everyone tells me lil wayne is a good rapper.
>>528838650
What's the problem, if the policy of the military isn't and doesn't have to be as aggressive as with a few gun-ho soldiers who are on a razors edge because they're always out numbered.

File: imagesWZZP96D7.jpg (11KB, 226x223px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 226x223px

>>528838845
Shes wrong and knows it but continues to argue because she cannot admit she is wrong. Typical woman logic

kek this argument is almost as retarded as this thread thx guys>>528836563
>>528838236
>>528838483
>>528839278
>>528839374
>>528839409

>>528830263

No, motherfucker, they already worked for it.

Women already fought for their right to work and vote and do whatever the fuck they want.

That's why we want you to SHUT THE FUCK UP.

It's already done and over. You assholes have gone and changed the arguments from RIGHTS to perceived equalities. Now its anything you find offensive, or hurtful, or hindering to your agenda. It's beyond what is right versus what is privilege, it's now about being a bunch of cunts.

>>528825584
>telling her she is irrational
>refusing to talk to her
>refusing to sleep with her

Jesus how do they write this shit and not feel like complete fucking hypocrites.

>>528839374
>I'm from a military force and have see women that are as good as men in many areas of expertise and can act as good as anyone in it.

lol. Maybe in the Air Force.

>actual former soldier
>never saw a female who could perform as well as males
>was told by an entire room of female soldiers that women shouldn't be allowed in the Army
>they were right

>>528839202
>Please find me any military scholar or general who agrees with you. Just name a few.
We don't live in a world of muskets or spears any more, do you understand the importance of context?

>>528839409
No, I'm saying we DO need them. They're just not being sent to where we need them.
>>528839359
More soldiers on one side = fewer casualties, and less need for reactive, aggressive tactics and more ability to do pre-emptive, less destructive tactics. More soldiers on both sides = more casualties, which won't happen because 3rd world countries won't let women read let alone join the military.
>>528839281
Might do.
>>528839278
Sending a bunch of troops
>bad political move
Rebuilding the shit you bombed
>not really our job to be political, y'know

>>528839278
I'd also like to see how these women who are cramming for a place in the infantry react when they realise they'll become builders

>>528839409

>> women should be able to fight because they're as good as men

>> we dont need extra soldiers

8/10 troll made muhreen reply.

>>528840141
good. I browse /k/ regularly. See you there.

File: a_iaa-Motivational-Poster(...).jpg (47KB, 600x481px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 600x481px

>>528840141
More soldiers = more dead when my 130s blast you apart from 22,000 feet. lol You can run but you will only die tired.

>>528840141
>Rebuilding the shit you bombed
>>not really our job to be political, y'know
The last place we seriously bombed was probably Vietnam, and we've offered them a fuckton of aid. Are we supposed to just carry all those countries on our back forever?

>>528831293
This is not age of empires, you fucking twat. More soldiers does not equal win.

File: 1367110599817.png (110KB, 344x278px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 344x278px

>>528839202
>Please find me any military scholar or general who agrees with you
I don't have to do shit. History is already on my side. If the military agreed with your argument we'd have 20 million poorly-trained conscripts instead of 400,000 dedicated VOLUNTEER infantry.

You're basically trying to hide the fact you lost the argument by forcing people to do fetch-quests for information you won't even read if retrieved. I've seen this tactic before. I'm not playing that game. Your next post will prove numbers convey an advantage, despite the fact every war in the past two centuries having proven you wrong, or I'll consider this as your surrender and acknowledgement you've lost.

Matter of fact, I'm going to drive this point home just to show everyone reading how goddamn stupid you are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War

Finland:
>337,000–346,500 men
>32 tanks
>114 aircraft

USSR:
>998,100 men
>2,514–6,541 tanks
>3,880 aircraft

Result?
Finland buttfucked the Red Army

Casualties:
>126,875 dead or missing
>188,671 wounded, concussed or burned
>5,572 captured
>3,543 tanks
>261–515 aircraft
>323,000 total casualties

Oh yes, MUH NUMBERS sure do matter in war!

>>528840049
So basically, that's just your opinion.
>implying most of the time battles where people are outnumbered are usually advantageous for the people with less numbers
>>528825584
Where the fuck is this from.
>>528839657
I'm not a she, I have no motive to keep arguing something which doesn't benefit me.

>>528840141
>More soldiers on one side = fewer casualties
We already have that. Our current military force is larger than all of Iran's, including Taliban forces. But it's more efficient to kill them in small groups over a long period of time than it would be to fly our entire army in and raze the country to the ground.

>>528840758
Not true trust me I was in Iraq when we did shock and awe. We blew the fuck out of those fuck tard Hodgies.

>>528840141
>More soldiers on one side = fewer casualties
You will back this statement up with hard evidence, right now. Or you're just another deluded feminist shitposter.

>>528840978
Are we not still fighting in/around that area, though? I thought the U.S. didn't usually give aid until the war ended.

>>528840867
If history agrees with you then there should be a bunch of observations and conclusions about it from generals. Don't pull out your anecdotal evidence of smaller batallions winning and then claiming that's the general pattern. Conscripts are bad for entirely different reasons than there not being lots of people, conscripts are people who don't want to fight. But more willing soldiers is most of the time a good thing.

File: (2MB, px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, px

>>528840978
>Hodgies

>>528841657
Sand Niggers, Whatever you like to call em.

>>528840990
When people are outnumbered, they give up quicker. It's intuitive. I don't have a list of wars and battles on hand because I'm not a military general, but neither is anyone in this thread. And no, I'm not a feminist I'm an egalitarian who thinks 1st world white women are the most priviledged group of people alive today.

>>528837846
From the Romans up until today every general has said that discipline counts for more than numbers.

>>528842072
So in other words, you have no evidence.

Okay.

>>528826085
Holy fuck you are so fuckig stupid

>>528842135
Discipline =/= physical ability. Discipline is doing what you're told without creating a fuss and not running away from combat.

File: 1367116949920.png (132KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 320x320px

>>528841512
Here's one such scholarly article, which of course you will not read because it proves you wrong:

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1060132?uid=3739600&uid=2&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21103389811343

Any other arguments you'd like to lose?

You still haven't provided any evidence that quantity trumps quality in the military, whereas you've been provided numerous instances where the opposite has been true. I can only assume because you have no evidence, and are merely talking out of a "MY FEELINGS" standpoint.

>>528842135
read sun Tzu the art of war.

>>528842276
What evidence do you have that when there's a lot more soldiers on one side that there's more casualties?

>>528842836
The battle of Thermopile for starters.

how did this antifeminism thread with a kickstarter project turn into a thread about fuckin war?

>>528842621
This is an article about the cost vs quality of weapons, it has nothing to do with suggesting that militaries should minimize the number of soldiers. So how does it prove me wrong?

>>528842836
The Battle of Marathon, Battle of Halidon Hill, should I go on.

>>528811025
>feminism
>best
now pick one carefully, this just might be the red pill for you

>>528842836
So you're demanding scholarly evidence that the military intentionally chooses quality over quantity, but when pushed to give any evidence to support your own arguments you refuse.

Okay.

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1114752236/lemenist-project

we need more to spread the word of men!

still only on 100

>>528843047
See, I could do that too, I didn't want to start picking and chosing battles because it wouldn't paint the bigger picture.
The Anglo-Zanzibar War for starters.
>>528843085
People were complaining that women are in infantry which I thought was hypocritical because in all earlier anti-feminist threads people were complaining that women weren't in infantry, so then I pissed everyone off.

File: 181.gif (78KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 300x100px

>>528811025
this is bait i tell ya hwat

>>528843250
Confirmed for not reading it.

It discusses precisely why the US prefers quality over quantity, and how that thinking extends into every facet of the military.

You have to provide evidence now, or you're just shitposting.

>>528843639
>People were complaining that women are in infantry
No, people were complaining that women don't have to meet the same standards as men to get into infantry.
It's perfectly fine for a woman to be in infantry if she can perform as well as the average man in infantry.

>>528843085
Because some vaginally devastated feminist is mad that men don't want infantry PT standards lowered so a few token dykes can be shoed-in solely for having a pussy, and in the process getting regular grunts killed because those women are unfit and unqualified to be there.

Once this was pointed out, the feminist went crazy and started saying absolutely hilarious shit like if you get shot and the unfit unqualified woman can't drag you to safety, its your fault, and that "more numbers = less casualties" in war. Despite being proven wrong numerous times when someone pulled out stats from previous wars, she refused to accept that evidence and is now demanding scholarly articles at the academic level. Anything to keep her from admitting she's wrong.

Just proves feminists are literally crazy.

>>528843639
>Anglo-Zanzibar War
Lol 40 minuet war 500 Sultans troops died 1 brattish sailor dies.

>>528843315
Yes, me and you should create a list of battles and compare differences in strength vs number of casualties for about 60 or so battles.
>>528843424
No, I'm demanding scholarly evidence that it's militarily wise to have fewer soldiers. From every time I've heard about war, the factors of who wins always include # of soldiers, technology, terrain etc. There's too many times I've heard of people giving up when they're outnumbered in history (thus less casualties). You're right though, I should have scholarly evidence of it.

>>528842428
To your arguments we are fighting wars that rely primarily on small scale tactical and special ops missions now more than large pitched battles. Asymmetrical warfare is the name of the game now son with small squads doing most of the missions. If a soldier, can't keep up, can't carry the necessary equipment and and can't carry or provide physical help for their teammates when they are in danger then that squad is going to fail more often.

Just do a little research and you'll see ever since Nam small scale special ops have been the deciding factors in war. That's how we operate now.

An IED goes off and a teammate is pinned by debris or has had a leg blown out with shrapnel. If the member of his unit isn't strong enough to help him, or is going to greatly extend the time they and other soldiers will be spending in the line of fire that is a huge liability. I think your concept of war and how it is fought, especially with regards to today is completely off the mark

Also the discipline point illustrates that a team working together efficiently is the most important factor in winning. If members of a team cannot sufficiently keep up or perform certain duties the team will suffer in a way similar to an undisciplined team that doesn't react as quickly due in inattention?

File: Sad Desperation.jpg (420KB, 959x719px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 959x719px

>>528837221

File: 1235444_408001939300598_5(...).jpg (70KB, 800x578px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 800x578px

>>528836462

>>528844805
A smaller more, able force has on so many occasions defeated a larger force. The three day war is another good one.

>>528844597
Yeah, they stopped fighting because they knew they couldn't win. Because they were losing, because they were outnumbered as fuck.
>>528843917
I could only read the summary page because I have to register, even to read it online free. And there was nothing promoting the idea of having a small military size.

File: liveclitfree11.jpg (67KB, 614x677px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 614x677px

>>528818985

>>528845263
And were those technological and tactical wins, or did they just overpower them by being able to lift 50 more kg? There's a lot more to the military than just physical abilities.

>>528844805
>From every time I've heard about war, the factors of who wins always include # of soldiers, technology, terrain etc.
Number of soldiers mattered more in the eras before gunpowder. Guns have been the great equalizer for several centuries now. And 10 guys who can fire them good is always better than 100 guys who can fire them poorly. Every war involving firearms has proven it.

Further reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_of_the_United_States_Army

World militaries are shrinking because the need for massive armies is logistically, economically, and strategically worthless. Weaponry has FAR surpassed the need for huge divisions of light infantry. That era ended with World War 1. More men = more bodies, more mouths to feed, more transports needed, more gasoline required, etc etc etc. Why have 1,000 men when 100 men armed with the latest weaponry can out-perform that 1,000? Why have 200 people manning AAA turrets when three guys with a SAM launcher can do the same job much more effectively?

Quality has long since trumped quantity.

>>528845895
>>528845827
>>528845564
g8 b8 m8

File: 1369927739917.png (108KB, 231x250px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 231x250px

>>528845408
>sharia law
go fuck a sheep you shitskin subhuman muslim scum

>>528845729
That is a small squad issue, if you cant aid your brothers when wounded by carrying them to safety. Then you and them are dead.

>>528845301
Then perhaps you should register and actually read it.

>>528845729
>And were those technological and tactical wins,
No shit. Why do you think the military is downsizing? Because TECHNOLOGY and TACTICS are more important than bodies.

You don't realize it, but you just agreed with the argument you've been fighting for the past hour.

File: 1381279784583.jpg (111KB, 626x628px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 626x628px

>>528846127
Not a muslim, but you're a Jew.

>>528844923
But if you have a generally larger army than there can be more small scale OPs.
>>528845729
And I doubt even those are the norm. A common argument for the inability to invade the US through ground force is just that there's too many people who have guns, it's the same principal.

>>528817725
i kek'ed

File: (1MB, px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, px

>>528840867
>Someone actually remembers what happened in the winter war between Russians and the Finns
Torilla tavataan.

File: The+Dews+did+this+_2b69e9(...).png (113KB, 260x200px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 260x200px

>>528846238
>you're a Jew
Luckily I'm not. Even though I'd rather be a jew than a sandnigger.

>>528845729
Another good way to break a captured squad is gang rape the woman with them till someone talks. This would work pretty well on most people.

>>528811025
>muh pigs

goddamn, thats not even clever any more.

>>528818985
holy shit anon this is gold. what is the sauce?

>>528846721
I'd shit in their slick wet ginies and make em call me Big Boy Lafferty until somebody talked. Then I'd put a hollow tube in my ass and put the other end into their puss puss and fart into after eating broccoli and drinking apple juice.

>>528846223
Physical strength =/= tactics you retard, no one is arguing about the women not being able to shoot as well, or that they don't follow orders as well or that they don't know what to do in certain situations. You're all arguing about them not being able to do 1 task, out of the 100s of things you need to be able to do in the military, and saying that it somehow negates the benefits of having an army twice the size.
The ability to lift things doesn't make you a good soldier. I think instead of yelling at wtf women can't do on the battlefield you should be looking at what women could do, that needs to be done and that men can't do as easily as women could do.
>>528845989
The extra spending from the U.S military goes to cover technological advances because we don't have 2 million willing soldiers like China, not transportation. It's not like a female soldier can't operate a weapon as much as a man can, and it's a bad idea to kill everything and just leave, that's why the US has so many enemies.

File: 1390188981871.gif (1024KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

1024KB, 250x188px

>>528825595
This is 100% completely accurate and true. Not even an opinion, absolute irrefutable fact

>>528842072
>When people are outnumbered, they give up quicker.
Because morale is only the result of numbers.
Frankly, fighting women is likely to inspire morale in islamic countries where women=rape

>>528847378
Cont'd, there was a segment on the daily show about pre k-school education and how we should put funding in it. In the end there was a general or someone who said one of the biggest problems the military was facing was that they were struggling to learn how to use the weapons because they were too complex and the soldiers needed better education. Women complete secondary school at higher rates than men, they could be more valuable at operating complex weaponry.

>>528843639
This whole started when someone said that feminists complained about not being allowed in the infantry, but when they were allowed barely any women even joined, proving that feminists are just whining cunts and you completely missed the point.
It's still going because you can't admit you're wrong.

File: antimaleshaming.jpg (472KB, 1900x1440px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1900x1440px

>>528844967

>>528847378
They have to be able to run, get into position and move with 50-100 lbs of gear and ammo on them. There's a reason that there were physical requirements to get into the military in the first place. It's not some arbitrary thing that they came up with you dolt.

You are being raped in this debate and you are making it too easy. It's like you're getting wasted drunk and flashing your vagina to a bunch of niggers in the middle of the ghetto, and judging by your desperation to prove your unthought out arguments you're probably going to blame us for not arguing less logically so that it's a more even playing field.

>>528847873
Lol. Great. When they can't even get into position carrying 50+lbs of equipment to fire at the target in the first place that won't even make a difference. R maybe we should just make one of her squad mates have to carry the extra weight and call it equality,

>>528847378
> I have some dishes I guess you can do.
> I suppose the military could use some breeders or dorm hoes.

File: 1390174879845.jpg (45KB, 407x407px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 407x407px

>>528828046
Women can be in the military, no beef there. Not all of them are shitbags and even then, there are some who can out pt even the toughest rangers.

However, those women are in the extreme minority, and bleeding heart feminist vagina bullshit has effectively changed combat related positioning and policies based on the complaints of those extreme minority.

Ive been an infantrymaz for nearly ten years, with multiple deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm telling you right now, that if I were shot or otherwise incapacitated, there is no female soldier, or athlete on this planet that is physically,mentally or emotionally capable of carrying my dead weight, fully geared, as well as her own mass and gear, the required distance it would take to save my life. Multiply that to the effective size of the infantry and you just lost whatever war were fighting next.


Leon panetta even said outright in a briefing with my commanders, "oh were fully expecting this to fail. Were just tired of hearing about it"

http://www.thedailybeast.com/the-hero-project/articles/2014/01/07/lowering-standards-for-female-marines-is-not-gender-equality.html
I'm going to sleep, but lastly, this is what I'm talking about. The military isn't 100% about physical fitness, if you don't need it why implement it so stringently just because that's the way it's always been. But women in the infantry don't somehow magically make the infantry weaker as a whole. And you can't be mad at feminists for not wanting to do the dirty jobs, then when they offer to do the dirty jobs be mad at them for doing the dirty jobs. That's just hypocritical and there's 100s of other more important things wrong with feminism other than the military angle.

>>528847378
>Physical strength =/= tactics you retard,
The Israelis were outnumbered during that war and won because of tactics and technology, which you just got done fucking admitting, destroying your own goddamn argument. Now you're back-peddling to save face. You are the biggest fucking retard to walk the Earth.

Oh and the IDF put the women into their own separate outfit because they sucked and caused casualties among the regular men. I bet you didn't know that, did you?

>>528810197
>>528811106
>>528839657
>>528839834
>this bitch right here
http://rumplestiltforeskin.tumblr.com/post/72567001836/rumplestiltforeskin-so-i-see-stuff-like-this-a

>>528847513
It is and I'm glad you agree.

File: dumb women.png (328KB, 622x414px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 622x414px

>>528848269
Feminism is not about equality.
Egalitarianism is about equality.
Egalitarianism has existed FAR longer than feminism.
Feminism is about putting down men to lift women up.
Blame, shame and ridicule = Feminism

>>528847873
If you can't carry gear, you can't medievac men, you are tactically worthless on the battlefield. Anecdotal feminist studies mean jack shit.

Also
>Daily Show

Confirmed for liberal retard.

File: 1524742_746544922040367_1(...).jpg (43KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x500px

>>528849151
This. There's a fine line between Feminist and Hater.

>>528849334
wow...
>>528848884
damn

>>528848269
And before that you argued that they never complained about not having certain luxuries that men do, like not being expected to join the military. And when they finally do you just hate them anyway, that makes no sense. If all feminists did was "complain" they wouldn't be a problem. Feminists take away rights from men and that's the problem.