Asking genuinely for people who DON'T subscribe to the website

uhh lots of yknow stuff yknow

100% truthful facts that are not made up to keep you subscribed

Seems like some faggy circlejerk website where a bunch of middle aged geeks beat off over the good old days and how wwe ruined everything

No need to get a subscription because if him or anyone else on the site says anything remotely interesting someone else will just repeat it for free

Uhm written reports and podcasts by a bunch of dudes

>>2882143
Okay this seems to be the only serious answer so I'll tell you you're kinda mistaken on both points, especially the latter.

There's tons of articles, historical stuff, notes and discussions that just don't make it off the website because they're not like, rumors or news or anything.

There's a lot of criticism of WWE and comparing stuff to the older days of wrestling, but honestly it's not like "oh things used to better", the more prevalent sentiment tends to be "WWE is really behind the times in its booking and needs to catch up to the rest of the industry."

>>2882124
Some of the rants are pretty funny, but I wouldn't pay for them or for their predictions/leaks if they were to somehow become only accessible via a paid subscription. I understand that they want to make money out of it, and if people want to shell out the money for it, more power to them, but I think it's kikery to charge 10 dollars a month for a subscription.

Autism

He literally makes shit up and his opinions are garbage cause he's a Indy smark

>>2882124
I subscribe for instant access to the podcast library, I don't even read the newsletter.

>>2882198
Missin' out big time, desu. I've never read the newsletter and thought it was a waste of time after.