In 3 years, WWE will have storylines about star ratings and workrate.

>>2880994
This would be better than the pigshit they're making now

I actually always thought they should have some sort of bullshit made-up league structure which would allow otherwise dead-end feuds to actually mean something

>>2880994
Ummm, well plans could, uh, change

>>2881006
Like...a belt that actually means something?

>the new McMahon character will be a heel rater who goes rogue
>book him with terrible opponents to drag down his rating
>give him poor ratings for clearly great matches
>the next Austin will have to overcome his ratings
>this is the future of sports entertainment

File: hqdefault.jpg (29KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 480x360px

>instead of Hogan saying the IWGP title is the most important, the new champions will say that only XYZ ratings mean anything, brother

>>2881013
but why does anyone get a title shot outside of MITB or winning the rumble?

Sounds like something Russo would do

>>2881006
NXT doesn't have formal numbers but Wins & Losses actually do matter

Kenny omega debuts and refers to the fans as "edrones" and will only speak in broken Japanese.

Workrate and star ratings and all of those other terms and discussion of them on the internet have existed for years. John Cena once made mention of it in 2011.

Why would they start making storylines about it now? It's not a new phenomenon.

>>2881006
That seems like the kind of thing that would be destined to backfire.