So the WWE is going to say that women can do what men can do and give us a Money In The Bank match. Then they're going to have a man help us get it? No, I don't think so. That's pretty symbolic right there. There were plenty of athletes in that match that could have fought to get that contract. There was no need for him to butt in. You guys can come at me all you want for being an angry feminist but you can't deny the message that was just delivered there.
Well if it was a regular finish, it would have easily been forgotten like the womens HiaC.
Ellsworth actually made this somewhat memorable
>he thinks women's """wrestling""" can compete
back to ding-dong diddly plebbit ya cringelord
>>2774601
all the womens should go away and go where they belong in a burdel or the kitchen
>>2774601
they all look like trannies
>>2774605
This. WWE did something right.
>>2774601
Between HIAC and MITB, the lesson is that WWE needs to stop making women's history. It's never a good thing in the end.
>>2774629
I enjoyed both.
>>2774601
Every single gimmick match the women have done so far has been shit. They're too scared to do anything risky or take hard bumps. Fuck em. They deserved to have a man win this.
>>2774629
this
>trying to push women in a sport where 80% of the fans are male, 10% female and 10% liberals faggots
bad idea
>>2774639
Implying Asuka and Nikki won't have a based LMS match