SMACKDOWN VS RAW WHICH IS BETTER AND WHY.

>>2315562
They're both mediocre. They have their good and bad points.

Most of both shows is pretty boring. With a little exception, the cruiserweights and divas are dead boring. Both shows have some great guys and some not so great guys.

However there's usually some good shit on both shows too. Like last night, the ending to raw was epic. That Seth Rollins/Triple H promo was good too. I'm sure we'll see something cool happen on smackdown tonight as well among a bunch of boring stuff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV0P8ahM4fw

>>2315562
Smackdown doesn't feature Stephanie McMahon, so it wins

>>2315562
BOTH ARE SHIT

SMACKDOWN IS MORE TOLERABLE BECAUSE OF NO STEPH AND FOLEY THOUGH

File: 1476323551045.webm (2MB, 506x354px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 506x354px

>>2315562
Raw has Bayley and her perfect, soft ass, so it is better.