Can we rank this as the worst rumble match of all time?
>No big name surprises
>all surprises were manlets or jobbers
>only maybe 2 memorable spots/moments
>winner was leaked a week in advance
Answer: Yes
>>2216306
18 fucking plus
You were a sperm in your dads testicles for the 1999 Royal Rumble
>>2216306
worst by far, and that's excluding the 30th entrant "surprise"
Don't forget goldberg botched elimination also.
>>2216312
Intreresting assumptOP here, 99 rumble was based because it actually had a story ya tripfag nerd.
>>2216306
Second part of the rumble was shit.
First part would be good with other ending.
The rumble was shit but there have been way worse throughout the event's history.
2014 and 2015, just to name two.
It just reminded me of how bad the roster is. A bunch of no-character charisma vacuums who bore the shit out of me.