>attitude era fanboy
>also enjoy 80s, early 90s, and ruthless aggression era, but to a lesser extent
>exclusively like heel Cena
>CM Punk makes me cringe
>current product is fucking unwatchable to me
>don't give a shit about indie darlings, but if they're good, they're good (AJ is based, Record Lowens is shit)
>female wrestlers are meh except for a few
>can't stand the shieldettys but I feel Dean and Roman have potential
so, am I a smark?
I think you're an anti-smark but not sure
What do you think of Kevin Nash Scott Steiner and hulk hogan?
>heel Cena
wat
You are one of the greatest marks of all time. Great for you.
>>2192245
>Kevin Nash
decent talent who needed to be filtered instead of running the show, opened WCW's coffin with his NWO empire obsession
>Scott Steiner
NO SYMPY
assuming you meant
>Scott Hall
Extremely talented retard who chose booze over success and let Nash overshadow him his whole career
>Hogan
the GOAT, but needed to be kept on a leash the same way Nash needed it
>>2192249
word life
>>2192265
no I meant Steiner, he's an anti-smark favorite
You not really liking Nash though takes you off that. In the middle of smark and anti-smark
>>2192243
Why do you feel the need to label yourself?
>>2192243
>>2192245
>>2192272
Anti-smarks mostly thrive on their perceived superiority over other fans and are their views being heavily contrarian to any modern wrestling fans'.
I'd pin him as a nostalgia fag. He likes the OG product and wishes it stayed like that, but is willing to recognize old fashioned talent when he sees it.
Also no anti-smark would admit they like modern women's wrestlers.
>>2192302
That makes you a smart mark. Not a smark IMHO. You know the smarts of the Wrestling business yet you have your preferences of a mark. That makes a good Wrestling fan IMO.
>>2192243
>thinking record low roman and deannetty have potential
smark
>>2192243
You're posting about wrestling on the Internet so yes, you're a smark. It's irrelevant what your opinions are.