I am going to be writing an essay and giving a presentation on whether it is possible that approaches involving genetic modification can become socially acceptable for pest control.
Im having a hard time coming to grips with what 'socially acceptable' means. Finding information about the science and facts of genetic modification + pest control is very easy, but to think about whether it will be socially acceptable or not is beyond what i can think right now.
Genetic modification on its own is already a controversial and maybe 'socially unacceptable' thing. Will involving it in pest control change anything?
Anyone have some ideas?
>>2328327
No. Not your personal army. Do your homework yourself.
>>2328339
Ive already done hours of research and have written down a lot of information. Just asking /an/'s personal opinion.
>>2328327
keep in mind that much of the western world opposes engineering crops for drought resistance or any other purpose even if it means feeding billions of starving brown people to do so.
"Socially acceptable" means not manipulating DNA at all. Ever. If you can't breed it, it shouldn't exist. Yes, this is neo-luddism. Yes, it will presumably destroy humanity. It doesn't matter, humanity is circling the drain already.
>>2328358
only in commiefornia