I would like to know if this specimen is a loxosceles laeta.

File: IMG_0685.jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2592x1936px

>>2114704
another picture,

>>2114704
yes.
the eyes tell you

No dude that's actually a spider

>>2114709
lol
Ithought it was an elephant. thx

>>2114704

I would definitely say a Loxosceles of some kind. If it's not a Chilean, I have no idea what it is. So yeah, I'd put my money on Chilean Recluse.

By the way, thanks for the helpful pictures. Nice change of pace to some of the assholes in here with their low-res blurry pictures taken from 10 feet away.

>>2114782
I appreciate your comment. It's a nice picture. I took it with iPhone 4 and magnifying glass, easy.
I'll take more pictures soon.

>>2115145
I've also uploaded it to wikipedia.
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loxosceles_laeta

>>2115149
seems pretty optimistic.

>>2115163
I've written to the biology university of my city an email asking for their opinion, but not answered yet. If someone in wikipedia could check if the loxosceles is actually a laeta sort, I would be glad. When the university's zoological department answer me I will leave or remove the picture of wiki according to it.
(soory about my english)

>>2115168
I'd bet money it is.

but I'm no expert on spiders.