Ideal Body Type

File: 1437192272663.gif (936KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

936KB, 500x281px

all men want 2 or 3. all women here are 6 and 7.

>>17941515
7

>>17941515
Anywhere from 3 through 5 would do.

>>17941515
1, 2, and 8 are fine. 2 is definitely the best though.

>>17941515
3 is ideal, I'd settle for anything in 1-5.

somewhere between 3 and 5

I'm 2, would like to be 8 or 9.

>>17941515
Personal taste:
3 >5>1>0>2>8>4

I'm very much into skinny girls, but for just fucking, I preffer chubby with big tits. Chubby with tiny or ugly tits no pls.

I'd accept 1-4(although 4's boobs look kind of weird which is throwing me off), and 5. I optimally like 2.

I might settle for 0, but probably not.

>>17941515
1, 2, 8 ... maybe 3 if she otherwise had a great personality and face. Would probably give 0 and 4 a chance too.

>>17941515
>average
She's fat though.

>>17941515
My favourite would be a mix of 4 and 8

File: Tryin real hard not to laugh.jpg (34KB, 617x581px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 617x581px

5

>>17941515
Male
5

>>17941559
pics?

File: 3243.jpg (41KB, 601x367px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 601x367px

>>17941707
no

Athletic, hands down.

>>17941707
>>17941712
REJECTED

>>17941515
2, 3, and 5 for me.

>>17941716
its a sad day for mankind

>>17941515
Nice thick thighs 3,4,8,8,9

>>17941743
Don't reply to me you utterly worthless faggot

1, 2, 3, 4, 8 - All acceptable. No rating required.

0 - too many bones look ugly.
5 - not the worst aesthetically but is dangerous bet, she may let herself go. She's on the edge. If she's on her way down from a bigger size then maybe, but she better not fall into a depression or something and go back again.
6, 7 - lmao gross
9 - also not the worst aesthetically but I am not a strong man and I would probably feel inferior. Depends if she still acts cutesy.

>>17941712
>>17941747

The 6 and 7s are getting pretty uppity.

>>17941515
2, 3, 4, 5, and 8 are ideal
0, 1, and 9 are situational if they have a good personality
6, and 7 are deal breakers, I'm not into that

>>17941787
And so what? You'd be lucky to have me, virgin.

>>17941793
I think very few have committed crimes severe enough to be deserving enough for a 6 or 7.

>>17941796
You're just jealous of me, a real woman. What's wrong? feeling insecure about your small pee pee?

>>17941801
>jealous

The main thing separating you from me is 3000kcal extra a day for a year.

File: moshi.png (6KB, 252x256px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 252x256px

>>17941801

>>17941810
I've had plenty of men. I'm not unnatractive. I have the curves in all the right places, virgin. Not that you'd know anything about that.

>>17941747
sorry about your dad man

>>17941817
thats why you feel the need to tell us, you're probs north of 150 pounds with bacne, stupid fucking whore

File: 500fd6b0a22643fb87bac1c1b70029d3.png (96KB, 223x197px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 223x197px

>>17941817
>insecure about body type
>insults people on an anonymous mongolian cave painting forum
>calls others jealous

Please, nobody wants you sister.

>>17941821
wow, you upse virgin? I'm hot and I know I'm hot. I can get sex anytime I want while you cry yourself to sleep.

>>17941847
talk is cheap baby, keep talking yourself up, without proof you're a fat worthless whore.

Male
One through 5 for 6 I have to be in a mood

>>17941853
Oh, after saying I'm ugly he wants some pics to masturbate his small baby penis with. Uh sweetie, don't think so.

3 & 5 in my opinion the best.

>>17941861
7

>>17941867
Hmmm, try 3, virgin

>>17941517
>all men want 2 or 3

No, 2 is too thin for me. 3, 4, 5 are the real deal (although 5 will definitely turn into a hambeast when getting older).

2 or 8, but I'm fit myself.

I'm a 4, but working on becoming either 2, 3, or 8. I'm naturally curvy, so I might have to settle for 3 , but I'd like to be 8.

>>17941515
Ideal type is something around 3 or lower.
My current girlfriend is between 5-6.

The girl I cheated on a 7 year relationship with a couple days ago is a 2 with literally perfect C tits.

>>17941905
3 is the best of these, hands down. Some men will prefer 2. Almost none will prefer 8 rather than the two others.

>>17941912
That's good to hear, I'm like 2-3 months and 10 lbs from that. I'd still prefer 8 for myself though, but that's gonna be like a year if I'm lucky and turn out to be genetically blessed.

>>17941515
If all I've got to go on is body and nothing else: 3 or 8. If the only thing I'm getting out of my partner is their body, I'm not settling. Settling for what essentially amounts to a self-pity-fuck is disgusting, I'd rather actually kill myself.

If there's more room for consideration of the other person beyond just their body, I can work with any of those except 6 or 7. Unless she's sick, there's no excuse. That's just laziness, and I don't have time to invest in a lazy partner.

inb4 guaranteed replies

>>17941923
This person >>17941912 is strictly wrong. Many, many men would prefer an 8.

But it doesn't matter. As long as you aren't a 0, 6, 7, or 9, there's going to be very large populations of men who want to have sex with you. For the 0, 6, 7, and 9's, there's still plenty of guys who want you, it's just smaller populations. Anyone who disagrees is either ignorant of reality, in denial, or outright lying.

1, wish i was 2

>>17941515
Everything except 6 and 7

>>17941979
The problem with 8 is in the small tits, which, added to the muscles, make her look slightly manly.

Plus there's the assumption that the girl is a fitness freak who could become 9 anyhow.

I'm usually #2, fit, but with small boyish boobs. But right now I'm under 115 pounds because I got really sick. I'm trying to gain weight now. I try to go to the gym at least 2-3 times a week. Because I'd rather be more athletic.

>>17941515
ITT: Guys are declaring which body types are universally ideal, which are acceptable, and which are undesirable.

The truth is that each man is different. I prefer the 0 as my ideal. Would be okay with 1 2 8 or 9. Also love East Asian girls.

>>17941998
double d master race checking in

>>17941515
>ideal
curvy
>settle
curvy with a little extra around the ass

Ideal is probably a 3, but 2-5 and possibly 8 are all fine

>>17941567
Sadly, those tits are often ugly...due to fat, lol.
(I know, I'd want to titfuck Mickey Bells as well, but she's not an average chubster)

>>17941988
eat more

>>17941515
>ideal
average, with emphasis on hourglass figure.
>settle
Between 2-5, now emphasizing hips. Motherly tits wouldn't hurt either.

>>17941515
2-5 is fine, 8 can be fine depending on the girls build.

File: Life finds a way.jpg (200KB, 895x643px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 895x643px

I'm legitimately happy with a woman anywhere from 2 to 5, the bustier the better. I always hear women kvetch about how men want a supermodel but I'm really not seeing it.

>>17941988
SKELETONS

>>17941515
Between 5 and 3. 5'7, 150 lbs.
Want to go from 180 to 130 lbs.

>>17941515
2-4, a bit of 5 and only slightly 8.

6 is absoluley perfect

*Absolutely

>>17941874
shut up useless slut

>>17941515
Anything 1-5 honestly, I'd consider 8 or 9 if we have great chemistry.

I used to be a perfect 2 but now I'll admit I'm moving in the 4 direction or am already there, but I'm in my 40's goddammit. Most women I know 10 years younger than me are well past 5 and will never go back.

>>17941515
As a gay woman, I'd say 2-5 and 8 would all be fine. I'm personally between 2 and 3.

>>17941515
Th-there's too many choices

ideal: 0,1,2,3,4,5,8.9
not ideal: 6,7

anyone else is underaged and/or have a whale fetish

>>17942791
>In 40's
>Still on 4chan
What are you doin babe?

>>17941515
I'm 4, leaning to 3 but I've always wished I'd have 1. The kind of clothes I like just look fucking awful in my body type, and I wish my bones were smaller.

>>17941515
fit, curvy and average are the best obviously... which one is better varies from person to person and is also mood dependant

I've always liked chubby girls the most.

>>17942866
You're here forever.

9
Sex has to be at least 30% rape in order to be great and if she can't put up some resistance it's just boring. I want to fuck her with a battle boner, not with a horny boner.

>>17941515
1,2,3,4,8, if she could snap you in half for not doing dishes she's a keeper

Definitely 8, but I probably couldn't keep up with the sex

everything except 6 and 7 is fine.

but only because it's a health problem that can usually be attributed to lack of restraint with meals and a lack of exercise.

I actually don't mind girls chubbier than the chubby pic. maybe a little more belly, more leg fat. but not like the fat girl imagine, just a controlled sort of fat.

Everything except 6 and 7 are attractive to me.

>>17941515
>0 anorectic
Only if she allows me to help her. Dont like.
>1 boyish
Nah, flat is justice. At least i dont have to worry about her getting super fat after 3 kids.
>2~5 above average woman
Let's date.
>6+7
My mom was super fat. I was fat kid until I discovered /fit/ and lost 30kg. Pls ladies dont be like my fat mom. It is miserable life for you and for your potential partner. Dont be super fat.
>8 athletic
See 1 aka flat justice.
>9
Never seen anything like that in my life before, I would run away.

5-6 for me desu.

>>17941515
3, 4 and 5 are all good to me

2 8 and 9 instant boner

Honestly I'd fuck any except 7. Hell, I'd even fuck 7 if I was drunk enough. 3 is perfect though.

Any aside from 6, 7 and depending on the face, 9. But the jump from boyish to fit is a bit crazy, kind misses the flater/squatter/smaller women that seem to be everywhere.

2,3,4,5

My girlfriend is a 6 but I prefer a 5 or 4...

>>17941515
8 is ideal. If I restrain myself to the "realistic" ones, I'd say 3... but it's not like a fit girl would be in my league. I'd settle for 1-4

>>17944278
*2, not 3

>>17941515
0-5 and 8 are all eligable for my dick.

Very strong preference for 5.

Personality is more important than looks. Male autism keeps most from realising though.

>>17941515
Between boyish and fit

>>17941515
5.5 Trying to get to a 3 like the "average" women in america

>>17941515
3 or 5 for me, please.

For me 5 is my preference.
2, 3, 4 are good
8, 9, 6 is not bad but depends

>>17944678
>>17944654
>>17944453
these chubby chasers lmao

I prefer the two skinny chicks for looks but these guys are right, fat girls are better for sex.

>>17941515

1 through 5 for ons,
4 and 5 for relationships.

>>17941515
5

2 and 3 are ideal for real men.
Would settle for anything but 5, 6, and 7.
There's a thin line between chubby and fat and most chubby girls where I'm from are moving closer to it than away.

Some "men" claim to prefer 5-7 but that's because that's all they can get. A man with options won't go for that. If his options become limited he may "settle" for that but not because he thinks it's better. That's all he could get at the time where as for chubby chasers that's all they could get at any time.

>>17945713
But that's not true. People have preferences that might differ from yours.
I think most of my best friend's ex boyfriends are okay-ish but not hot, she thinks the same of the guys I dated.
She goes for short guys, I go for tall guys. She goes for tanned dudes, I find pale skin the hottest thing ever. She likes gym rats, I don't. She doesn't like beard, I do.

I'm a 4 with 1's tits.

Fucking kill me

>>17946072
Delicious.

>>17946080
It's painful to look at people younger than me that look older than me.

>>17946101
Looking younger, for a woman, is a good thing. You shouldn't worry about sagging tits when you hit 35.

>>17941515
ideal 3
2 3 4 5 8 wouldn't be a dealbreaker
6 7 are disgusting
0 1 9 are freakish

I'm kind of impressed by the variety of opinions in this thread. Only a few seem vehemently set against chubby girls so that made my day.

I'm a proportionate 5 (i guess thick?), always wished i could be 2-3 but even with excercise and eating right i seem to bounce back and forth between 4-5.
I just hate when people assume i eat bad when i escentially eat paleo and cook my own meals
Dr said i have a slight hormonal imbalance but not enough for thyroid meds.
Otherwise, all my other numbers are in ideal range. So at least I'm still kinda healthy.

>>17941515
5. 4 or 6 ok too

>>17946525
I think 5 or 6 is ideal... but dont make shit up. you are a 5 cause you eat like a 5.

>>17946570

You don't know me but thanks.
I'm over here eating plain ass eggwhites and spinach for breakfast so i guess thats what a 5 eats

>>17941817
Hahahaha, is this satire?

>>17946525
Men are much more open to all types of bodies when it comes to attraction really, for girls only the muscular and tall type is truly hot.

>>17946622
That's a whole lot of eggwhites fatty

>>17941515
Most attractive on that picture is 2 by far, I think the vast majority of men would agree with that.

Ideal for me is:
>short (around 5'-5'3)
>big boobs (C cup is fine)
>small waist
>big butt
>soft and cuddly, but definitely not fat/chubby (probably shouldn't be more than 125 lbs)
>adorable face
>nice hair is really important, blonde is preferred
>qt high voice
That's *ideal* to me anyway.

>>17947141
Yeah, but shagging a 2 is an once in a lifetime thing.

>>17947141
>most attractive is 2
>describes someone between 3 and 5 as ideal

>>17947201
You must be European.

I'm a 3, but with slightly thinner legs. I'd like to be a 0 or 1. That's because I absolutely hate having big boobs

>>17947107
Bullshit! I know a lot of girls (including myself) who like various types of guys. I hate the way muscular men look, I really do

I'm fine with everything excluding 0 and 7. 1 and 9 are a tough sell, because i don't feel like I'd be attracted to them unless they were really interesting. The rest are alright. I prefer girls with meat on their bones.

>>17947306
I'm guessing you like skinny/skrawny guys then?

I'b between 3 and 4, and want to be between 8 and 9

5 is my fave, 2-4 is very attractive, I'd go for 1 or 8, the others are unacceptable.

>>17946525
>I'm kind of impressed by the variety of opinions in this thread. Only a few seem vehemently set against chubby girls so that made my day.
Most men arent really picky.

>>17947326
I do, but I also like Seth Rogens-looking guys. Basically any guy that's not muscular/super overweight (it'd be an odd match since I'm on the thinner side; I think we're prone to choosing partners that have similar body types to ours). I'm also tall for a girl (5 ft 10) so I prefer guys who're at least 5 ft 8.5. Face matters a lot when it comes to overall physical appearance tho

>>17947378

I just figured your response "i don't like muscular guys" meant the skinny guys, since everyone I've known who's detested muscular guys have been into them.

Personally, I'm curious how many women are attracted to men more on the chubby/fatter side of the spectrum. I don't really see that. It's much more common on the flipside, but i guess women more gracefully store bodyfat than guys (see curves).

File: 1467967601797.jpg (18KB, 469x505px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 469x505px

>>17947413
>Personally, I'm curious how many women are attracted to men more on the chubby/fatter side of the spectrum.
I don't either. I think a lot of it has to do with the simple fact being overweight isnt really masculine. Meanwhile you can still be feminine if you have something extra.

>>17947413
Very, very few women find chubbiness attractive.
I'm bi, and I would fuck a chubby girl, but not a guy. As you said, women tend to store fat in hips, butt and boobs, which looks good, provided they don't go too far. Not 10/10 good, but fuckable. Men story it everywhere and look terrible.