This is the best place to ask this.

If it was warranted (ie they were threatening to hurt him or other loved ones), then aroused. There's nothing more attractive than a man who knows when he needs to step up and protect.

I'd question why I was dating a violent vigilante

File: raven_and_cyborg_teen_titans_by_raven_jinx-d9dj766.jpg (50KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1024x576px

>>17364144
A vigilante?

Are we reading the same story

>>17364164
Depends, are you reading the OP?

>>17364171
Yea, a vigilante who goes out to defeat crime in the intentionally.

Beating up some people who are threating you is more of a 1 time thing.

>>17364180
Vigilantism involves taking the law into your own hands. If you're beating up someone who threatens you, you're a vigilant. There is nothing in the definition of vigilante which requires a pattern of behaviour

>>17364195
You see the thing about the law is that it's not real. Everything that is just and unjust is based off of subjective morality. To be honest to be a real vigilante there would be acceptable record of vigilantism. Kind of like shooting a gun once does not make you gun fanatic.

>>17364220
Look, if you didn't want people to state their opinions, then you shouldn't have asked. I'm not going to argue semantics with someone who can't handle that I might not agree with their actions, or even their definition of a word.

File: 1467777014231.jpg (490KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 2048x1536px

>>17364223
Im just trying to clarify the situation that is all? We can agree to disagree.

But can we really call the man in question violent. It seems responding to threats was more defensive than offensive.

>>17364229
I told you, I'm not going to argue with you.

>>17364240
Not trying to argue, more debating but ok.