No knot and knotted welcomed!
No furry, no gore.
Believe it or not, they are indeed different. Read rules.
Really? I would not be surprised. I figured porn kind of got the mentality of it all wrong after that woman got busted for it with by her husband.
A lot of this is on Hentai foundry.
Lots of terms like knot, dog, canine, bestiality come up with results, but the site is very inconsistent with terms, so try them all!
I remember that thread, it was likely because those pig soldiers are considered a type of furry. I tried submitting an image when the thread was deleted.
The rules will likely change in due time, I'd just wait it out or find a work around.
It's really not worse, but the problem seems to have more to do with the furry community rather than the actual porn itself. I really don't understand the logic to be honest, but bestiality is not banned and I like it.
It's apparent because there are a lot of spagetti warriors who hate furries. Bestiality threads have been in /b/ for awhile, so it's different, somehow.
I really like pictures where the girl likes having sex with the dog like this one. The whole rape theme is annoying.
Always thought Minda was a bit too sexual, but in porn it's great.
Shadbase does such a great job when it comes to dogs.
People into beast have the good sense to keep quiet and to themselves and don't seek public acceptance.
It really comes down to admitting that your fetish makes you fucked in the head instead of insisting it's perfectly normal.
Red a cat or dog lion thing? I don't know.
You'r right, but humans have always done bestiality, Greece or Rome come to mind instantly. It's obviously evolved with humans even if people don't like it. I am sure there are more people who jerk to it or do it than admit it. Laws in some states ban it, some countries like Germany ban it. But everyone just goes to where it is legal, so that doesn't do much good. Real bestiality is dangerous in ways usually for the human. I like cartoons mostly, unless it's the animal doing the penetrating.
Anyways, getting bit too political for a porn thread. Good night.
Not really. It just takes time to learn them. They could have been stated a lot better.
I need to go, I've been on this board way too long, mostly because of erectile dysfunction.
Only place it's specifically said it's not allowed is on /d/.
Though, if it's not allowed on such a board like that, it shouldn't be allowed in /aco/.
I was informed the real problem was way more practical, furry content often (used to?) have dmca-claiming artists and that was too much of a problem to deal with.
Everything said if the fallout from all of this once eventually a solution is implementation is that there's a board with /d content that allows bestiality, it was worth the drama in my books!
I came here to post this.
Finally, a thread that I can enjoy!
>tfw this is my fetish
>tfw I know this is fucking disgusting and I've been trying to avoid it
fuck you, OP
1 of whatever else I have
That's a cute tracking cookie there.
I am in complete opposition to your opinion. The pointed and bulbous canine phallus is sleek and appealing while being appreciably alien, while the cylindrical equine phallus is ugly and blocky. It doesn't even look like it's designed to fit inside any orifice.
>but none of that furfag stuff
Y'all have some fucked up priorities
If you can't enjoy the basic pleasures of a girl violently orgasming around a knot of a dog that's taking advantage of her then there must be something wrong with you, as far as I'm concerned.
Just like you would any other porn.
>nooooo we'll complain about how furry porn is banned on board but bestiality is not
Come the fuck on, people! Your complaining is not going to change anything (at least not in this thread).
This. Tentacle monsters are ok. But dogs?! God forbid you see a cartoon drawing of a chick getting plowed by a dog penis
Let's see what happens to this one >>47300 as Red 13 is intelligent and can talk. If it stays, then sapient bestiality is fine.
Though of the two you asked about, I'd say Brian Griffin would be banned for being Furry, as he walks on his hind legs and can hold things in his hands. Other than being able to talk, Scooby Doo is an otherwise normal animal.
Animals with human features is the definition of Furry; what was once a normal animal is changed to be human-like.
But then, what about humans with animal features? Where a normal human is changed to resemble an animal? For example, Man-Bat from the Batman franchise. Does he count as human, or is he considered a Furry?
"do not post images of characters with muzzles, snouts, or any other major non-human characteristics. "
Key word is "non-human", So posting animals with human features might be different. For example, a lot of animals in this thread have human like expressions, but that isn't furry.
>a lot of animals in this thread have human like expressions, but that isn't furry.
But it is "anthro"; they have been anthropomorphised to have human-like intelligence, speech and emotions. And "anthro" is banned by GR3.
But didn't "feral" as a descriptor, to differentiate from "anthros", originate within Furry fandom?
I actually Googled the term Anthropomorphic and found out that Anthropomorphic s not exclusive to just animals.
Technically, the Annoying Orange and many other characters would be banned if the literally definition was used, which is just absurd. But I think it's pretty common sensed to assume the rule was put there for furries.
you are literally the only person in the world who didn't know that
and seriously, are you asking the rules to be spelled out in legalese? If you're going to be pedantic I guess you found the right place
4chan has never given a fuck about DMCA's, at least for the most part. Jeremy Bernal is notorious for threatening every furshit site on the web to remove his work, 4chan is one of the only sites I know of that told him to fuck off.
In actual biology: In an effort to create the biggest litters possible, evolution gave dogs a knot that completely plugs up the female's vagina. The female's climax results in muscle tensing. This combined with the knot function like a buttplug, locking in semen.
....wait. How the fuck do I know that?
guess I'll dump some shit as well
Curious on the mods stance on werewolves on humans and thundercats?
For fucks sake, why are people here so retarded?
Wanting to fuck animals =/= wanting to BE animals
Furfag porn is literally a human body with small animal features like hooves and tails, with a theme park's mascot as head, or sometimes just the anthro character's head on the body, kinda like those offmodel porn pictures where its the character's head shopped on a realistic 20 year old girl's body or some shit
Characters like scooby doo, even if they were bipedal wouldn't be considered furfag shit because they still have animal anatomy
Just because there are furries on the fandom, it doesn't mean its furry porn, show accurate pokemon porn still falls under the anthro area i mentioned before, even them its eastern so i don't know why its here in the first place
>nothing about 4chans rules is written on stone
FTFY, mods sometimes do shit even though is against/not on the rules because its the best for the board, its only a matter of time until the same happens here
It would be nice to have some things about the rules cleared up, at the moment there's a lot of drama that could be avoided. Hopefully things will settle down soon.
Hopefully I'm not breaking any rules by posting my own archive of beast stories, mostly female + dog but it includes one Rapidash + Girl and some other stuff as well. Hopefully my shilling will be overlooked <3
solsticeerotica tumblr com/stories
Let me put this in another way, the whole furry/not furry thing is more like a spectrum rather than a yes or no thing, the lines between furry and other similar kinds of porn is very thick and the differences are small details, the things that make furry porn different from the other kinds of porn are already in the sticky (plus a few other things to make sure nobody will twist the rules, sadly making a few innocent kinds be forbidden), zoophily, being it with actual animals or "cartoonish" animals, is not furry, thus is not forbidden
How is this thread still up? I'm laughing so hard thinking about this, like the Fritz the Cat thread got deleted for being furry and there's like a ton of people on /qa/ raging about this specific thread and it's still just stuck to the front page going about it's business. I haven't laughed this hard in months.
Its a wildcard on Pokemon, Swat Kats, Thundercats, Gargoyles and other things until said otherwise by jackie 4chan
wait theres people raging over on /qa/ over this thread, my sides.
But seriously why can't everyone calm the fuck down and just fap
Because the mods are being naziish about furry shit, but a thread about bestiality is apparently a-okay. It's kind of dumb the scale is apparently 0% human and sentient or 100%, and nothing in between
I figure give em a month or so and shit will straighten up.
God knows when half of 4chan gets on a Callie and Felina Feral bender new swat kats material starts happening and theres not a force on the interbutts will stop it
>FTFY, mods sometimes do shit even though is against/not on the rules because its the best for the board
Or because they feel like it and use a sense of entitlement to justify being accountable to no one.
Part two to this?
i can not understand people who go to the trouble of solving a captcha just so they can complain about the rules. if you don't like how the rules are being applied, GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.
Whoops messed up the order.
Dmitrys really does make some good stuff.
I really like a lot of the older shadman work for some reason.
This thread is my gift to you 4chan!
CoC is a game about making a foxmorph with horse hooves, cat ears, 5 dogdicks each 4 foot long, a tentacle tail, dragon wings and a cunt that can take a minivan and then engaging in greash sex with similar creatures.
As a game art of it would be within those rules right?
I doubt anyone on 4chan wants a board for fursona circlejerks and awful art, just a board where you can post anthro porn for meat-sianking purposes without spoodermang and minion spam bombs.
*Maybe* even recommendations for artists to look up.
/co/ conclusively proved that modern Marmaduke becomes funny simply by adding angry eyebrows.
also, clearly we need some Marmadicking going on in this thread.
>this is one of my biggest fetishes
Thank you, /aco/.
Not even 4chan x2 's /zoo/ had any of these pictures I'm seeing here. My dick can't take it.
It's all about the community, not the content.
If Furfags get a foothold via porn, 4chan will become the next Deviant Art within a week.
Watch this channel's videos to get an idea about the kind of people that global rule is designed to keep off from 4chan.
Did the the bestiality board on *that other chan website* get deleted? Where am I supposed to go now?
>we can't allow furfags to get a foothold
>we need /pol/, it's a containment board
pick one, 4chan.
>this person is an example of the majority of the people within a group
Why don't you go to furry forums and interact with furries to see how they really act instead of spouting shit you've heard or stupid shit you've seen on the internet? Go to phoenix.corvidae or something
Man, those were hilarious. Shit like that Scotsman or the overly-sexualized woman with the super deep man's voice. However, pretty much none of that had anything to do with furries. Just looked like normies pretending to live in dream bods, which is the point of SL, isn't it?