No real category, just post your absolute favorite pictures
No scat, diaper fetishes, or anything of that variety.
To be fair, her/his pixel art does have this weird pot belly. I find it cute, but it's understandable if you dont.
Not to mention, most of the art that gets posted in this thread/on this board comes from tumblr artists. Don't pretend like it isnt one of the biggest resources for western cartoon porn whether you like the place or not. Relax and fap dude.
Understand that and I would go through a bad time just to fuck the shit out of her given the chance but...
Literally on the cover art
[spoiler]Get out of here Stalker![/spoiler]
So what you have an issue with, then, is ageplay and soiling. Fair enough.
It's kind of a stretch to say that diapers are just 'thick underwear', though.
They're a portable bathroom you strap onto your privates -- their explicit purpose is to catch human waste. Poo and pee are intrinsically tied to the concept of diapers.
This is the main reason people are weirded-out by it.
I'm sort of a 'to each their own' kind of person, but OP did request that the tread not contain diapers, and I think there are valid reasons for drawing the line there.
Plenty of people wear them without urinating or defecating in them simply for the comfort and sexual appeal. That combined with even those who do use them for that purpose wearing them as underwear the rest of the time makes it clear that the primary function of diapers is to be underwear. One of their functions is that they're absorbant, but it doesn't mean they have to be used for that.
Having an issue with wet or soiled diapers is understandable, but if there is no actual waste in it, a diaper is objectively no worse than any other kind of underwear. Being grossed out by diapers is nothing but an uninformed kneejerk reaction when you get right down to it.
>Except Blacks and Mexicans
See, this is the real reason nobody likes you hardcore deviants. OP makes it clear what he doesn't want posted, but you two have to butt in and "correct" him like he just criticized your religion. Even without the excuse, you already have a thread. You don't need to post your shit where it clearly isn't wanted.
Literally just an underwear fetish. Singling it out and acting as if there's anything wrong with diapers is irrational and results in negative attitudes and treatment towards people who need to wear them in real life.
You don't even have to be into diapers to get that propagating the notion that diapers are something disgusting is more harmful than just sucking it up and learning to accept them as just another perfectly good kind of underwear.
Sounds like normalfags like you.
>using normalfag as an insult
>the current year
What you do not seem to grasp is, we don't want it, keep it the fuck out of these threads.
I love /aco/, great threads, lots of post and all that. But you scat loving, diaper wearing faggots ruing it.
Fun fact: This fetish is a common coping mechanism among incontinent people due to the ignorance they face from normalfags like you. If you want to see less diaper fetishists, start by not making such a big fat deal of people's choices and preferences in underwear.
My fave picture ever, by far. Look at this cum covered back <3
>so new he doesn't even know how commonplace the word "normalfag" is here
Shouldn't you be getting disgusted at how people can be turned on by drawings while you're at it?
>using one of the filtered words
Yup, you're a newfag at that, even.
>/d/ is not welcome here.
The mods say otherwise.
You don't know how wrong you are, Slappy. I've always found "normalfag" to be idiot-speak at its lowest.
>you're a newfag at that, even
No. Very deliberate in my usage. It makes cretins like you jump up and down with unwarranted smugness. It's an odd way to get my kicks, yes, but far better than being a grotesque diaper fetishist.
That's a queer skirt to hide behind, considering how hated the mods tend to be. By associating yourself with them, bootlicker, you become even more worthy of scorn and loathing.
Nobody cares what someone who's triggered by underwear thinks.
By the way:
>8. Complaining about 4chan (its policies, moderation, etc) on the imageboards may result in post deletion and a ban.
Man, what the fuck is your problem? It's not like you're getting ousted from the site. You have your own thread and the entirety of the board to post your fetish. Stop acting like a baby and honor the OP's wishes.
Except they're right. If somebody makes ignorant remarks about your fetish comparing it to scat, of course you'd be pissed off. Because of people saying uninformed crap like that without being corrected, diapers are viewed with way more hatred and disgust than they reasonably should be.
>anything of that variety
That makes no sense, though, as diapers and scat have nothing to do with eachother, not to mention scat isn't allowed outside of /b/ in the first place.
Funny words from someone overreacting to diapers.
You in a nutshell.
>DIAPERS ARE LITERALLY MADE TO CONTAIN ONE'S SHIT, UNLESS YO WEAR THEM BECAUSE YOUFIND THEM SEXY.
>what is urinary incontinence
>what is people not as ignorant as you who are willing to try out unorthodox underwear
They're literally underwear. You can't whine about shit unless there's actually shit in them, retard.
>YOU'RE TOO MUCH OF A RETARD TO UNDER STAND
Do I need to say it?
>YOU HAVE DEDICATED THREADS FOR YOUR DISGUSTING FETISH
Ah, but you see, this isn't a disgusting fetish. It's a perfectly tame and normal one that you're just going to have to live with people having.
>JUST GO TO YOUR GRANDMAS HOUSE AND ASK HER IF YOU CAN SEE HER DIAPER
Why? Lots of perfectly normal people of all ages wear them.
>JUST LEAVE THE THREAF
Okay. I won't leave the thread, though.
>the primary function of diapers is to be underwear
You see, this argument falls apart when you ask "well, why are you wearing *diapers* instead of any other underwear? The thing that makes diapers unique -the entire reason for their existence- is catching waste in those too young, ill, or old to manage it themselves. Sure, people may spend more *time* 'just wearing them,' but that doesn't make that their primary purpose. The risk of shitting yourself is the only reason to wear them over other options to begin with.
Before you say that they are about "comfort," why does no one just draw or design poofy, "comfortable" underwear? Something expressly intended to capture that "comfort" that diapers apparently offer? Why would you want to keep that connection to 'battling incontinence' or 'being too young to know better,' unless that was a key part of everything?
There just is no way around it; diapers as a fetish exist because of 1) ageplay and/or 2) scat, and I don't see any good argument around that.
>Being disgusted by the diaper *fetish* is equivalent to bullying people who need to wear them for medical reasons
Surely I don't have to say anything else? The problem here is fairly self-evident.
Nah, I'm just more intelligent than you.
We welcome ourselves, thank you very much.
>"well, why are you wearing *diapers* instead of any other underwear?
Why not? They're comfortable, and the only reason not to is an irrational stigma that should be combatted.
>people may spend more *time* 'just wearing them,' but that doesn't make that their primary purpose
That's kind of the definition of a primary use, though.
>The risk of shitting yourself is the only reason to wear them over other options to begin with.
And, you know, the visual and tactile appeal.
>Before you say that they are about "comfort," why does no one just draw or design poofy, "comfortable" underwear
They do. They're called diapers.
>Why would you want to keep that connection to 'battling incontinence' or 'being too young to know better,'
There is no such connection unless you go out of your way to make one. An adult in a clean diaper is no different from an adult in clean panties.
>There just is no way around it; diapers as a fetish exist because of 1) ageplay and/or 2) scat
3) humiliation play 4) watersports, 5) medical play 6) bondage 7) because something as thick and soft as a pillow hugging your crotch while plastic as soft as silk rubs against your legs happens to be comfy as fuck
Yeah. The problem is ignorance regarding diapers.
Let's get this thread back on track.
There's no reason to get butthurt because people don't share your excitement when it comes to diapers. People associate diapers with waste because that's what they were created for. The amount of adults without bladder problems who wear diapers solely for comfort is very fucking small and you know it. It's usually some weird sexual kink that grosses others out.
Probably my favorite Korrasami 34
Surprised that there's not much ATLA/TLOK porn featuring that.
noun: diaper; plural noun: diapers
a piece of absorbent material wrapped around a baby's bottom and between its legs to absorb and retain urine and feces.
You're an idiot.
No, but that definition is idiotic, considering people of all ages wear diapers. Here's a better one:
>A diaper (also called a nappy in South Africa, Ireland, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia and Zimbabwe) is a type of underwear
This guy is trying so hard, this is hilarious.
Wait a fucking minute...that's Wikipedia. Let's see what an in-depth analysis gives us...
Hmmm..."Although most commonly worn by and associated with babies and children, diapers are also worn by adults for a variety of reasons. In the medical community, they are usually referred to as "adult absorbent briefs" rather than diapers, which are associated with children and may have a negative connotation. The usage of adult diapers can be a source of embarrassment, and products are often marketed under euphemisms such as incontinence pads. The most common adult users of diapers are those with medical conditions which cause them to experience urinary like bed wetting or fecal incontinence, or those who are bedridden or otherwise limited in their mobility."
Close, but no Kewpie doll. Diapers are waste-receptacles, specifically-designed for such.
You were samefagging -- you forgot the cardinal rule: no one is ever convinced of anything by anyone on the Internet, *especially* on 4chan.
> fetishizing, say, panties.
Panties aren't designed to sop up piss and contain shit.
>garment worn under your outer clothes to cover your privates and rear
It's designed to sop up piss and contain shit.
Say, anon, do you have a $4000 hat?
You're the one whining, though.
It's especially hilarious since he's completely right.
>Diapers are waste-receptacles, specifically-designed for such.
Nope, they're underwear that happen to have that function as well, just like it says. Needless to say, one shouldn't give a fuck about that function unless it's actually being used for it.
>You were samefagging
Keep telling yourself that. You're still wrong.
>Panties aren't designed to sop up piss and contain shit.
And yet people do that in panties too. Just like you don't judge panty fetishes by panty pooping, it's retarded to assume diaper fetishes necessarily involve dirty diapers.
>It's designed to sop up piss and contain shit.
That doesn't matter in the least, since they don't do that unless you go out of your way to use them that way. It's piss and shit that's disgusting, not diapers themselves. You're basically doing the equivalent of sperging out over stocking fetishes because you're imagining the stockings are sweaty and filthy.
>diaper underwear argument
You've already had enough fun with that game - it's time to stop now.
>calling others irrational to justify your own warped desires
In just about any other time in human history you would have been socially ostracized, locked in an asylum, attacked by others, outright executed, or some combination of these. Modern times have allowed people like you to become arrogant and demanding, as you have shown with your behavior in this thread.
>You've already had enough fun with that game - it's time to stop now.
Yes, it's pretty clear I won, after all.
>Modern times have allowed people like you to become arrogant and demanding, as you have shown with your behavior in this thread.
On the contrary, behavior like mine where one actually thinks rationally and realizes there's really nothing wrong with diapers instead of blindly falling into groupthink and attacking others is what has allowed society to become modern. Considering you long for stone age behavior, it's pretty clear your kind is the one that's subhuman here.
Hey, OP here
Jesus fucking christ
What the hell is this, tumblr?
I mean come on I make a mild misconception about something I don't know much about and everyone decides to lose their shit.
I just wanted to enjoy some porn with people who share my interests.
It just so happens that I'm not a fan of diapers, scat, or age play.
Say what you will but I feel it all goes in hand.
And it's not like I'm going to go research something like that so I don't offend people, this is 4chan. Get over it.
Stay if you want, post your damn diaper nonsense if you want, there's really nothing to stop you.
But I would personally prefer not to see it here.
Here's some porn.
Incase has been putting up some good shit lately
your heart was in the right place.
Just trying to uphold the purpose of the thread, I get it <3
I came here for porn and got a discussion on wether diapers are good/bad/disgusting/legit underwear/what so ever...
>boner is kill
>mood is penisve/contemplative
the weird thing is I don't even mind tho. I had some good laughes and giggles in this thread and it's kinda hilarious how you nutjobs argue about anything, even if the subject of the discussion isn't wanted in this thread. I mean where is the point in this whole website if the community using it don't follow "their own rules"?
All of you fags arguing about diapers are just pathetic. The ones arguing for diapers are, because, well obviously, you either can't read (see OP) or just don't give a single shit, which brings me back to "where's the point in all of this".
Those of you arguing against diapers are pathetic, because you are getting trolled so hard, even a blind guy could see it. Just ignore the diaperfags and everything will be just fine.
....Could we please get back to porn now?
sry for any mistakes/misspellings etc, english =/= native language and stuff
This guy gets it
I'm sorry, anon.
Aged-up characters are okay, right?
An icing girl making out with a fat cinnamon roll girl. It's fucking ridiculous and I love it.
The majority of the thread doesn't want fucking diapers, lol. Just make your own thread; they're free. If it's as commonly accepted as you claim, you should have zero problem finding the content you're looking for.
You're still here because you're trying to prove a point to anonymous internet users that a diaper fetish isn't weird and that people above the age of 3 wear them as normal undergarments. It's abnormal, and you refuse to budge, lol. I really don't get it
>Nope, they're underwear that happen to have that function as well, just like it says. Needless to say, one shouldn't give a fuck about that function unless it's actually being used for it.
I think I see the problem here
>No scat, diaper fetishes, or anything of that variety.
But horsedick is A-OK!
I can't believe it, holy shit. I did not believe that there were so.e people that were stupid and petty enough to use Wikipedia as a source to back-Yo there weird, niche fetish. Now I've seen everything.
So are My Little P[spoiler]erson[/spoilers]s alright then?
Nadia from Star Wars the old Republic
There is, however, a pretty decent reason to be buthurt when someone decides that because someone DARED to ask that their fetish NOT be posted, they just have to go out of their way to derail the thread with their fetish. Whether or not diapers are disgusting or linked to scat/age-play, anyone posting them in this thread is an asshole.
ffs, diaperfags are as bad as futafags on /d. Make a thread specifically asking them not to shitpost their fetish and they spam it up.
why not just go "I guess I dont need to post my fetish here, since OP asked me not to. I'll move along."
THEN you bitch when you get called out about your shit tier fetish.
There is nothing wrong with an underwear / lingerie fetish. It's the infantilism and shit and piss implications of diapers.
They aren't "comfy" you just like sitting in your own shit.
If you want some non-shit and piss filled undergarments look at these. And Victorian chicks in general. You can take your baby-bags elsewhere
Notice how the posts arguing about the fetish don't have pics attached to them? Trust me, people are being very considerate despite the unreasonable way they're being treated.
Because of the irrational stigma against them, visible in this very thread. If everybody who hated diapers just shut the fuck up about it like they should, the world would be a much better place, considering that very same hateful attitude regarding diapers also results in abuse, bullying, social isolation and medical malpractice (such as doctors recommending experimental medicine with dangerous side effects against incontinence that rarely works, and catheters/surgeries that cause injuries and infections) against legitimately incontinent people who would have much happier and less isolated lives if there were no shame in wearing diapers.
>It's the infantilism and shit and piss implications of diapers.
Disregarding how infantilism is no stranger than petplay or S&M, there are no such implications unless those elements are actually present.
>They aren't "comfy" you just like sitting in your own shit.
I'd say the people who actually are into diapers know a fair bit more about them than you, so you should probably shut the fuck up. It's common consensus among diaper fetishists that diapers are comfy and that most find shitting in them to be disgusting. Those are the facts, deal with it.
>If you want some non-shit and piss filled undergarments look at these
Or, you know, clean diapers.
>You can take your baby-bags elsewhere
Sure, but the underwear worn by people of all ages, also known as diapers, stay right here.
just fuck off, OP said no diapers. there is no point in arguing about it.
You see, it's not about posting diapers in this thread. In that case, one could have just spammed diaper pics and said "fuck the haters". What matters here is demonstrating how irrational the kneejerk reactions against them are, and pointing out the simple facts that make those reactions so irrational. Basically, if people say retarded incorrect shit like diapers being just for babies or being inherently scat, they will be called out on how ridiculous they sound.
I'm not the one who's triggered by an underwear fetish, though.
Betty is seriously missing freckles
I find the stuff done by this artist to be far sexier than I should.
>implying a garment who's sole purpose to exist is to collect human waste isn't related to scat/piss.
>implying you couldnt just leave this thread alone, GTFO and go post diapers in a diaper thread.
>implying diapers are underwear
The /d/eviant's problem isn't having a fetish, it's being autistic when it comes to acknowledging everyone isn't into his fetish (protip: if you remove the sexual attraction from depictions of sexuality, all you're left with is the realization that people are gross).
Otherwise they'd be fapping away at some diaper thread, leaving us to rot in our own mediocrity and closeted ways.
What's the point in typing up all this shit when it's just going to get deleted like all your posts from yesterday?
Just ignore the diaperfag and report his bullshit, it does get removed.
OP literally said:
>No scat, diaper fetishes, or anything of that variety.
What part of that do you not understand? Stop getting so autismal about it. You're contributing nothing to the thread and just making yourself look like a faggot. Go to one of your diaper threads or some shit. Jesus Christ.
it really feels like these individuals like to push their way into something where they are not welcome, obstinately pursue their agenda and whine about being oppressed. I think it's a modern form of autism or at least a key indicator in diagnosis. - source : some kind of degree and accreditation hat allows me to make said diagnosis.
I'm requesting a pebbles pic in one thread so it only seems fair that I post one here.
I blame by girlfriend (and Ranma 1/2 fanart)
for any foot fetish I have. She does shit like use her feet to jerk me off and then says I have a fetish because I came.
She also requests to have her toes bitten sometimes. (weirdly just the big toe and the little toe.)
Not him, but he does have a point. The people getting butthurt at him look far worse than he does, that's for sure. He looks rational, not "autismal".
>whine about being oppressed
Judging by some of the posts in this thread, that seems like a pretty accurate claim. Maybe they're actually justified in their claims and should be welcomed?
Have some watersports to make up for the text.
>Judging by some of the posts in this thread, that seems like a pretty accurate claim. Maybe they're actually justified in their claims and should be welcomed?
Diaperfags, watersports, or other fetishes like that were never a welcomed part of /aco/. Did you not see the massive backlash? Literally the only reason why they're tolerated here is because /d/ is too autistic about muh glorious nippon art, and the mods are too retarded to realize that there is no point in balkanizing a board dedicated to unusual fetishes
But lets say you have a place that has a bunch of clubs that lets you sign up for your special interests - and then someone with little interest in the club (advanced basket weaving)comes in and starts bitching about why no one is talking about 18th Century Poets and why can't they? and why can they? Why aren't THEIR interests being represented.? - well of course because everyone is making baskets and doesn't give a fuck about the poetry. - if they did they woudl have signed up for poetry.
Not into watersports but it's less offensive to me.
And that's the last I'll post on that.
What I don't understand is why don't they start threads where they can be ignored by everyone else?
If an artist *did* have an interest, well using the catalogue isn't that hard.
There is a certain "sameness" about this art but I do like the disney princesses portrayed here.
>That's not for you or any other vocal group to decide. The mods say this is the place for it, so people are going to post it here, and that's that.
Just because the mods "said this was the place for it" doesn't mean it's true. /d/ is already for weird shit, so splitting it is pointless.
>Judging by this thread, though, the situation is more like >>178493. People are making a big fat deal out of nothing and insulting others for their fetishes on arbitrary grounds. Of course the ones getting insulted would be pissed off.
People were making a big deal out of it because OP *specifically* said no diaper fetishes, and then you attempted to justify posting it anyway.
Just stick to your containment thread and nobody will give a shit. I have no idea what part of that you don't understand.
I'm okay with this because of the little hearts.
I like a little bit of bondage once and a while so I'm big on consent.
- I hope that makes sense.
Also, seriously Dick Suckin Lips. in Forward Onto Dawn that's al lI could see.