japanese aristotle
lol>>>/r/eddit
>>161607652
You go with him.
Fluffy Shirou is cute andI want him to hijack the show from Miyu Shirou
>>161607593
They all make sense within context though.
>>161607593
WHAT A FUCKING IDIOT! PEOPLE DIE WHEN THEY ARE KILLED AHAHAH THAT'S OBVIOUS!Just kill yourself.
No? you celebrate getting older
>>161607815
Maybe until you turn 30. After that you don't want to celebrate getting older.
>>161607815
You have to be over the age of 18 to browse this website
>>161607815
>>161607864
I'm sure that I'm younger than 50% of /a/ and I already don't want to celebrate getting older.
>>161607960
>>161607896
>>161607864
Nonsense. You celebrate becoming closer to death.
>>161607593
Sasuga Sherou
>>161608056
You can end it at any moment, though.
>>161608061
Sagisu Shirou
>>161608080
Nice double dubs
>>161607593
Can UBW Shirou beat HF Shirou?
>>161607593
>>161607710
The middle one makes sense even without context
>>161608494
All of those statements are logically sound even in vacuum.
>>161608456
Nope. Although HF Shirou would probably die after winning.
>>161608456
HF Shirou can trace Nine Lives or Caladbolg II before UBW Shirou can setup his RM, UBW's swordspam of nameless NPs wouldn't beat someone who has the full power of Archer. HF Shirou would win in a K&B fight.
>>161608494
>>161608551
I love you guys in a non-platonic straight way.
>>161607593
There's literally nothing wrong with either of these statements.
>1.) People die, if they are killed.
The intent of this statement is to tell you that he thinks that life is valuable and that someone ceases to exist on this world when he dies.
Are these categorically true statements? No. Some people may find that life is not valuable, people also disagree on when a person truly ceases to be. For example, when is someone dead? In the West, death is defined as the cessation of brain functions, in Japan, death is defined as the cessation of heart functions.
Someone might not even agree on the fact that true death is physical. There's this saying in my country that everyone dies thrice:
Once, when his body ceases to function;
twice, when those who remembered him in life died (or he is forgotten);
thrice, when his remembrance is altered.
>2.) Just because you're correct, doesn't mean you're right.
Shirou correctly differentiates between the quaestio facti and quaestio iuris here. Just because someone is correct descriptively, that doesn't have to mean that he is also correct normatively.
>3.) When you have a birthday, you celebrate being born.
You could also celebrate still being alive. You could celebrate still being alive in a certain fashion, like being surounded by those you love. You could, in fact, not celebrate at all, but rather ritually make wishes for the future.
>>161607687
So this is the power of moe huh... not bad lmao
>>161609047
They aren't exactly profound statements either
>>161609047
bro calm down it's only shitposting, nothing more
so you can still report him, for shitposting
>>161609244
Doesn't take profundity for it to be an acceptable thing to say.
Especially the second one people get wrong all the time, and the third one doesn't exactly sound like it was intended to be very "deep". Also, he was buttmad when saying the first one. One should be more lenient about something that was said in buttmadness.
>>161607593
The second one is a miss-translation that I think they did on purpose because of the first one.