>Tarantino : the anime

Guess I have to watch it now.

When people compare things to Tarantino on this board do they mean it in a positive way or a negative way?

>>160351323
Tarantino has more faux-philosophy in his movies and little to no fantastical elements

There's no such thing as anime's answer to Tarantino because Tarantino is an ironic pastiche artist, and anime is a medium with no sense of irony or self-awareness. Maybe Bakemonogatari comes closes.

>>160351405
positively in the non-linear story telling and the converging of the sub plots and negatively in the infodump and tedious dialogues

>>160351466
>anime is a medium with no sense of irony or self-awareness
Ironic shitposting is still shitposting. Ironically bad movies are still bad movies.

>>160351323
That's not a Gainax anime

>>160351323
>Tarantino
But Baccano is actually decent.

More like Guy Richie, pleb.

>>160351323
So it's shit for 12 year olds and I don't have to watch it?

Good to know.

>>160351323
The ship episode came out of nowhere and was pretty awesome.
The final episode with that blonde dude with a wench is shit though and make it seem like another light novel advertisement.

>>160352686
>The final episode with that blonde dude with a wench is shit though and make it seem like another light novel advertisement.
Yeah, because he looks like Kida from Durarara!!

>>160352431
don't listen to OP, Baccano is actually well made.

File: 1196147874658.gif (179KB, 350x197px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 350x197px

>>160351323
>>160352190
This.
I thought most of us compare Baccano with Snatch, when we watched them first time together back then.
Why you fucker compare it with that hack of a director now?

>>160352190

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5iFD6LmKi4

>tfw no homunculus gf

>>160351541
Irony and ironically bad are two very different things anon.

I wish they properly animated the scene where Luck took out Gustavo with his broken arm. Why did they have to change it?
>animate Ladd and all his odd hijinks
>lets not animate this scene though

>>160358932
In this context though?