What would K-On be like had it been adapted by another studio?

>>158150902
better

File: 1476698389885.png (989KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

989KB, 1280x720px

>>158150954

Thank you for getting the stock response out of the way early, Anon-kun.

>>158150902
Why would you want to ruin a masterpiece?

File: cb9.jpg (28KB, 500x720px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x720px

>>158150902

Like this.

>>158150902
Inferior, obviously.
>>158150954
>>>/v/

>>158150902
Maybe they'd stick to the script and not insert their gay SoL shit.

>>158151305

Was it too deep for you? Can you only handle GochiUsa?

>>158150902

I assure you we would not be talking about it now.

There's a whole video out there about which explains how much the K-on Manga sucks and how Kyoani turned it into a masterpiece of moe slice of life if such a thing is possible.

>>158152835
No, it's just gay and out of place in a high school musical comedy.

>>158150902
Trash. The source material is weak, but KyoAni made it a masterpiece.

>>158150902
Still shit.

>>158154168
>>158152855
>>158151280
I forgot, this is shit t/a/ste.

>>158154216
Contrarian.

>>158150902
Way more sexualized if it was done by SHAFT

>>158152855
why?

I find the manga as good and entertaining as the anime

>>158154618
Nobody reads the manga, and if they do, they wonder why nobody but Mugi is gay.

>>158152855
Is that you, Digibro?

>>158154565
Madoka didn't have any sexualization. Neither did Hidamari.

>>158154943

Not digibro but I agree with everything he said in his video.

>>158154987
both those series are incredibly gay though