How is bad anatomy still a thing in 2017?

>>157736440
Are you retarded? Have you ever tryed to draw before?

It's not a 'can it be done' and more of a 'do I care' kind of situation

That's as stupid as asking "why is bad animation still a thing ? ".

I think it's purposely done to some extent to accentuate certain parts of the body. I'd prefer when it's closer to realistic 90% of the time but hey that's their preference.

>>157736440
What's bad about this image? The tits?

>>157736440
it's stylized to cater the the readers' fetish
even Raita still has some loyal fans here

Classical Greco-Roman sculpture reached the point of perfect anatomy, more than 2,000 years ago. Those artists realized that there was less value in anatomical precision than there was in beauty, and abandoned the concept of accuracy as the absolute ideal.

The answer to the question which you ask now was found more than two millennia ago. If you legitimately care about the question and the answer, you will study the process by which the answer was found. But, I do not believe that you do.

>>157736871
The entire lower half of her body you dummy.

>>157736871
the knee, the hips, the way the spine is bending, how the legs are attached to the hips

>>157736994
>Shitty hentai artists know more about art than classical greek artists

>>157737082
Who are you quoting?

>>157736884
Style has gone too far in the case of OPs image

>>157736440
>how is bad [anything that has been done correctly before] still a thing in 2017
>with all the references people have of [thing] shouldn't it be perfect?

That's the $1.000.000 question anon. Literally.

>>157738773
I'm not disagreeing with you but that's a mighty big strawman

>>157738798
I'm just generalising what OP is saying. Being able to tell when something is good and actually making a good thing aren't on the same level of complexity.

Unless you can prove that P=NP in which case you're entitled to a million dollars.

File: 1384033321997.jpg (83KB, 800x656px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 800x656px

Could be worse.

>>157737082
>Nigger pic
>Also can't read
As an irony, captcha gave me the word argentin.

>>157736994
The point is those people did it on purpose and used ideal standards, what you see on the lower body of that girl is just a plain clusterfuck you obtain after a violent car crash.

File: 6.jpg (595KB, 1251x1800px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 1251x1800px

>>157738163
pic related is Raita's art

>>157736871
Depends. There's nothing wrong with drawn tits, but keeping those tits prioritized instead of the rest of her body drawn properly is something else.

>>157740158
>anorexic girl with big titties
Shit art

>>157740158
The keep getting slimmer while boobs get larger

File: aa0.jpg (116KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1280x720px

>>157740577
>shit art
shit taste

>>157739190
>what asians theorize tall people to look like

>>157740577
it's not even anorexic at this point, she's literally missing most of her skeleton.

It's only style when you have a proof of the fact that you can indeed draw people with normal anatomy.
I.e. Raita has proven it multiple times both in his doujins and the work he did for Sega. OPpic is just some shitty artschool reject who went out and embarrassed himself online instead of doing more studies first.

>>157740158
That's one slutty kapa.