Now that the trolls and shitposters who plagued the threads are gone, let's talk about Seiren and how it compares to Amagami.
Tsuneki was the only good thing about this series.Ruise arc never ever.
The only reason to watch was for a ruise arc which will never happen.
>>157197528
It's shit.
>>157197562
Well, most would argue that it was tsuneki's fault.
Seiren I've seen the first two arcs and have started the third arc
First Girl was ruined the ending. Second Girl was alright.
So far Seiren can't hold a candle to Amagami SS. Photokano was closer to Amagami than Seiren
>making any thread during the weekend, with many aussies awake
I love Tsuneki's show.
>>157197897
>he doesn't think Aussie shitposts are top-shelf
Sasuga anon-kun.
>>157198883
There better than those filthy leaves
Both are shit.
Amagami >>> Seiren > Photokano
Amagami had some great arcs and great girls.
Seiren had pretty shitty arcs (except for Kyoko's one) and only Tooru was great girl.
Photokano had worthless 1 ep per girl arcs and quite good girls who didn't get enough screen time because of this.
>>157197897
Real talk, aussies are proper duders. They throw banter but not as much as people say. In fact they're actually quite serious.
photokano is unrelated
diff staff
Tsuneki's arc killed my enthusiasm for the show. It was like Rihoko's ending all over again, only worse because it was the show's first impression and Tsuneki was so desperate for the D the ending just doesn't make any sense. I tried to watch the rest of the first season, but I kept putting it off and forgot about it.
>>157197896
>Photokano was closer to Amagami than Seiren
>>157201810
Maybe they mean as in its less shit than seiren ergo more like amagami.
Sorry but nothing can beat Tsukasa arc in Amagami
>>157203453
But that's wrong too