Are guys allowed to be cute?

I'm a cute

>draw a girl
>call it a girl

why is this allowed?

>>157128960
Because literally free market and erections

File: kaichuumanga1.jpg (112KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 600x400px

>>157128807
Yes.

File: IMG_2491.jpg (130KB, 650x720px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 650x720px

>>157128807
No

Cute boys are objectively sexier and more attractive than cute girls.

>>157128862

Post photos of yourself por favor

>>157128960
>draw a girl
>call it a boy
>why is this allowed?
FTFY.

File: 132542__57_57251393958707_9_3319642288365__361930.jpg (48KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 600x600px

>>157128960
>make a fembot
>call it a boy

File: ad3f96939f24b9b27f9b5403b3038b0c.jpg (108KB, 480x643px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 480x643px

>>157130469
Fuck they're evolving too fast, how do we stop them?

>>157128807
My wife tells me I'm cute all the time, but it's the same cute she uses to describe yaoi twincest or angry tsun males.

I'm not really sure what that means for me, honestly.

>>157129782
>ywn be Kenshiro so you gotta go full trap

Why

>>157130058
You're literally stupid af

>>157128862
Gross!

>>157130594
We don't. We just let ourselves be embraced by the cute traps and let nature run its course.

File: some naruto males.jpg (620KB, 1200x889px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 1200x889px

>make a worldwide know anime
>put males like these on it
Why is this allowed?
What other anime does this?

File: would you let your son dress like this.webm (1006KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1006KB, 1280x720px

Would you let your son dress like this?

>>157135595
I would encourage it

>>157135595
I would enforce it.

>>157135595
I would make it a law.

>>157135566
i want to FUCK haku's footpussy

File: mmh.jpg (473KB, 1280x938px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 1280x938px

>>157128807
Of course

>>157135595
>tfw you will never train your son to be a trao

>>157130758
your wife is gay, anon

File: 1.jpg (263KB, 1280x646px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1280x646px

Would you let a cute guy have his way with you?

>>157139555

>trap on male

Fuck off Ash Wing. You had something good with trap x trap and male on trap, and then you ruined it.

>>157130469
>make a fembot
>call it a boy
>sell optional girl conversion parts
It's less a slippery slope and more like a slippery half-pipe.

>>157139785
Trap on male is the least gay of the three though.

>>157135566
Alas, poor Beard Ninja. We hardly knew ye.

only if they have cute feet

File: BOO YOU WHORE.jpg (205KB, 2249x1593px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 2249x1593px

>>157140078
>sell optional girl conversion parts

Why must they ruin something that is perfect

File: 1448564699434.jpg (318KB, 500x707px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 500x707px

>>157140192
What? I think that depends on the perspective. As the audience the gayness doesn't increase with increasingly gay "actors" but with decreasing levels of girlyness. I think few would argue that from the audience perspective bara is less gay than trap, but would agree that both types of actors withing the confines of the fiction are both "gay." The difference is that traps are girlier and thus contain more more girliness, the relevant factor in how gay something is. If a woman is +2 girliness then a trap is +1 girliness and then there's a scale of girliness going from 0 then into the negatives for different types of non-girly men.Trap x Trap is at least +2 girly where male on trap and trap on male are at best +1 girly and thus objectively more gay.

File: 1447140332930.png (397KB, 692x700px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 692x700px

>>157141813
i'll never get this meme
why did they pick this boatslut in particular and forced everywhere that she was a boy?

>>157141248
>I think few would argue that from the audience perspective bara is less gay than trap

Bara is the ultimate gay. What the fuck are you on about? Your scale is flawed.

>>157142165
You might want to re-read that sentence.

>>157130758
one of these days don't be surprised she brings home a young strapping chocolate lad to manhandle you while she watches

>>157142165
>>157142858
Oh wait, I get the confusion. It doesn't mean few would contest the assertion; rather, few would make the argument in the first place. "few would argue that bara is less gay" can mean two different things that are opposite in meaning. Yeah bara is more gay, but that assertion doesn't actually affect the result of the scale regardless.

>>157137654
sauce