>Can girls love boys?

Love isn't fucking real...

File: 60036415_p0.png (1MB, 700x3500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 700x3500px

No, but girls can certainly love girls instead.

File: 5263657r57657.jpg (90KB, 633x331px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 633x331px

>>156992352
>t. pic related

>>156992508
Unironically disgusting

File: 1490892856479.jpg (200KB, 1116x896px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1116x896px

Penis was mage for Vagina.

Pass it on, Pass it on.

Not as much as they can love girls, but well enough.

The order of precedence goes girls > shotas > traps >>> other males

>>156992352
for us at least

File: 60112804_p16_master1200.jpg (403KB, 800x1100px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 800x1100px

>>156993061
Don't say that anon.

File: 1472490472593.jpg (79KB, 748x720px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 748x720px

>>156992508
C-cute

>>156992320
No. Girls love their kids, money, and status among their peers as a means of sticking it to other girls.

>>156992320
>>Can girls love boys?
2D, yes.
3D, no.

Take it from me, it's better to avoid love and partners and relationships.

All you end up doing is waiting for your partner to go away somewhere so you can be alone.

>>156992320
2D, yes.
3D women aren't even sentient, they're like sponges with tits.

>>156992320
No, but boys can't love girls either, so...

File: 1487764457796.jpg (99KB, 307x870px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 307x870px

>>156992320
Of course not, that would be disgusting.

>>156992320

As long as boys dominate the girls enough to make them feel submissive. Beta MC's that the harem loves are a contradiction and pure fantasy.

>>156992320
As long as the man is dominant otherwise she'll cheat

>>156992320
In theory

>>156993810
There's no such thing as girls love only sluts

File: Trilby_and_Fedora.jpg (366KB, 1000x782px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1000x782px

>>156992606
Fuck that hat

File: 1482372827573.png (130KB, 2088x1904px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 2088x1904px

>>156992320
Of course not.

>>156998183
Even if you wore a proper fedora in 2017, you'd still look like a nonce

File: 1481220683931.jpg (81KB, 379x364px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 379x364px

>>156996495

>>156996495
Don't ever compare a sponge to a woman

>>156998236
Proper shave, haircut, and suit maybe not. You'd look like a weirdo tryhard, but not 'cringy' like normal fedoralords.

>>156998344
Yes you would, because wearing something that went out of style 70 years ago is stupid

>Promoting underage pregnancy and STIs

Disgusting

>>156998396
Most people would just assume you're wearing a costume though, or it's a genuine fashion statement. Only wearing the hat with a video game shirt and autism shoes doesn't convey that.

>>156998442
Maybe, but still, the only thing worse than being a fedorafag is being a fedorafag who goes

>The autist hat is a trilby, not a fedora

>>156998344
Only if you were an old man on top of all these things. Babyfaced millennials should stay away.

>>156998442
>>156998566
I saw an old man in a suit and a fedora at a coffee shop last month.
He looked very cool.

>>156998566
Nah, it's the way the pictures are taken, along with cherrypicking badass looking guys from the era. Notice how they aren't teeth smiling with goofy expressions or taking horribly lit selfies? They're also not fat, which is a requirement. Give top right, top second, and bottom right proper attire, better haircuts, and a well lit photo and they'd look good. The "hormones in muh water making girly men" is false, it's the fashion and incessant need to grin for photos.

>>156998397
>over 95% of population still identifies as nothing but cis-gendered heteros
>teen pregnancy and STI rates lowest recorded, ever
>being homo isnt known for STIs
>all STI's not present in gays at a significantly higher per capita rate than heteros

Despite shitty pop-sci reviews and urban myth, lesbians do not have a statistically significant lower chance of contracting STI's than heterosexual-only women, and have nearly identical infection rates to strictly heterosexual women

The take away is that men are disgusting and you're a fag.

>>156998786
We are not talking about 3dpd lesbians here anon, just the pure 2d kind.

>>156998212
>>156997953
>>156996685
It's like saying all mankind is gay and cis heterosexuality is something abnormal.

File: 62779650_p0.png (2MB, 1809x1906px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1809x1906px

>>156999132
>3DPD
Also male homosexuality is utterly unacceptable

File: 1481890222235.jpg (98KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1280x720px

>>156999132

>>156999132
Anon we are talking about the perfect 2d world.
Let's not mix it with the garbage reality we were forced to live in.

File: 1461748694676.png (2MB, 792x2228px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 792x2228px

>>156998042
>>156998109
Gotcha senapais

File: 1394336815284.jpg (43KB, 433x378px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 433x378px

>>156992320
>Can girls love

File: KSOjR9a.png (308KB, 546x700px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 546x700px

>>156999132
>cis heterosexuality

This thread and "the can girls love girls?" thread are retarded as fuck.

>>156992320
Women can't love, it's a scientific fact.

>>157001899
this
they are similar to cats in that respect, which is why catgirls seem to be such a fitting thing.

File: 1492973945297.jpg (99KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 600x750px

Not girls anon

File: 013.png (448KB, 1112x1600px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1112x1600px

>>156992320
but she loses in the end

Yes but boys can't love girls.

>>156999828
The screenshots of this show always crack me up. Do you have some of the others?

>>157002218
Entirely false. Girls are incapable of romantic love. Love is a business transaction to women; love is about how much a man can give and how much a woman can get

File: 1493635986559.png (186KB, 307x315px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 307x315px

>>157002363

>>156998566
Yeah, and a good square jaw too. Too many weak-chinned people out there.