Would John Lennon have become a weeaboo had he lived? What would

>>156811838
>Yoko Ono
>May Pang
he had dat yellow fever thats for sure

Boku no Pico

>>156811838
Jojo

god those costumes are so fucking retarded

File: 1482891054581.jpg (116KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 640x480px

>>156812189
>May Pang
No joke, my dad went on a couple dates with her in his youth.

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.

>>156813395
Okay, we get it, you don't like the Beatles. But it kinda looks like they were the best-selling rock act OAT, at least by certified sales.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_music_artists#250_million_or_more_records

Since this is still /a/, what would Elvis's (the second or possibly first most successful artist based on sales) favorite anime have been?

>>156814533
Elvis possibly had an Oedipus complex, so something with that. Or any incest.

>>156813053
you're retarded

>>156814533
In a sense, the Beatles are emblematic of the status of rock criticism as a whole: too much attention paid to commercial phenomena (be it grunge or U2) and too little to the merits of real musicians. If somebody composes the most divine music but no major label picks him up and sells him around the world, a lot of rock critics will ignore him. If a major label picks up a musician who is as stereotyped as can be but launches her or him worldwide, your average critic will waste rivers of ink on her or him. This is the sad status of rock criticism: rock critics are basically publicists working for major labels, distributors and record stores. They simply highlight what product the music business wants to make money from.

>>156813103
Post proof

>>156811838
boku no pico

>>156813395
Go to bed, Scaruffi.

File: hqdefault.jpg (45KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 480x360px

Jojo

>>156813395
/mu/ get out

I didn't read OP is this a k-on thread

>>156815470
>>156815487
You cannot stop the truth, anons.
Hopefully, one not-too-distant day, there will be a clear demarcation between a great musician like Tim Buckley, who never sold much, and commercial products like the Beatles. At such a time, rock critics will study their rock history and understand which artists accomplished which musical feat, and which simply exploited it commercially.

Beatles' "Aryan" music removed any trace of black music from rock and roll. It replaced syncopated African rhythm with linear Western melody, and lusty negro attitudes with cute white-kid smiles.

File: TomokoAbbeyRoad.png (2MB, 1220x1220px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1220x1220px

>>156811838