>fma got a shit anime that didn't follow the manga properly
>was remade and given the proper justice it deserved
>stardust crusaders got a shit ova that didn't follow the manga
>got the remake it deserved
>soul eater got a shit anime that didn't follow the manga at all
>????
>>154765438
Actually, SDC got a fantastic OVA that introduced the series to the west.
Then it got a shit ova that did follow the manga but was still shit.
FMA was good. Soul Eater(manga) was shit.
>>154765438
The Soul Eater manga wound up worse than the anime by the end. Though that still doesn't explain or justify NOT.
>>154765438
>Implying that the first fma anime wasn't superior to brotherhood/the manga where everyone and their mothers is running around with a philosophers stone and all you had to do to kill homunculuses was keep hitting them a couple of times.
Shit taste confirmed you pleb
>>154765438
Youre forgetting that unlike the other 2 Soul Eater is trash even in its source material
>>154765438
nobody cares about soul eater
Shut the fuck up about the Jojo ova you faggot
>>154765438
>Soul Eater
there was literally nothing wrong with this EXCEPT MAKA(and the ending I guess)
I genuinely do not understand Japan's obsession with placing the most unlikable and even least developed characters in the entire franchise as the MC
>>154765700
The only reason you have a problem with any of those things is because they are different from what happens in the first one.
>>154766433
Thats a weird way to spell Crona
>>154766433
Self-inserts
The more development an MC gets as a character, the more he strays away from being an imaginary agent of the viewer for fantasy. That's basically it
>>154767714
There's no real excuse with Maka. She has all the makings of an MC with a strong character, but without the actual characterization. Hell, the groundwork is all there, it's like the author cut the arc where she was supposed to develop or something.