Why is there no good three kingdoms anime adaption?

File: 41c9640d43a77aad1160b4c10a34d15dd635763f.png (348KB, 848x480px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 848x480px

Flawless historical accuracy, too.

>>153746558
>I don't like the early 90's adaptation because it portrays Shu as the good guys

Cow Cow pls

>>153746724
A good historical/fantasy romance can't portray one side as the good guys because that would defeat the purpose of the genre.

>>153746724

T. Zhuge liang

File: 5wb1g8.jpg (244KB, 1400x1000px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1400x1000px

>>153746558
Ikkitousen is good

>>153746748
So you're saying the original novel was bad?

>>153746891
I don't know much about three kingdoms, but if the original had one side which was objectively good then yes, it was bad.

File: 8iuk.png (916KB, 765x1070px) Image search: [Google]

916KB, 765x1070px

Why is there no good sengoku anime adaptation?

>>153746558
Why is there no good 100 Years War anime adaption?

>>153746558
Three kingdoms anime can't be too straightforward because that would draw too many similarities to Yokoyama's Sangokushi manga, which is perfect.

Though the actual Sangokushi anime is pretty good
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JvC65KNC64

>>153746882
I don't like rape

>>153746891
The original Novel was written by the person on the losing side of the conflict and was written deliberately to make the other side look bad.

Three Kingdoms and Sengoku crossover anime when.

>>153749103
Faggot

>>153749366
Wrong. It was a MODERN novel BASED on historic records written by a royalist fag.

>>153746558
>why is there no good adaptation of this shitty source material?
gee i wonder

>>153749391
Stalker: Call of Cao Cao when?

>>153746911
>>153746748
It's fine as long as both the "good" and "bad" guys are equally entertaining to watch.

>>153746882
>>153749103
Explain further.