Let's face it, Garden of Words has been his best (and quite

You've never watched Akira and Perfect Blue, haven't you?!

>>152072086
>has been *his* best

>>152070086
Still prefer 5cm/s

>>152072181
My bad. I've only watched Garden of Words from him, but I've heard nice things about Kimi no na wa.

5cm is so burned into my memory that I can't objectively decide which one is better. I loved Garden of Words but I can't decide between these two. They're in the same tier for sure though.

Kimi no Na Wa had potential to be just as good as those two works but it ran out of gas near the end, for me at least. However, it's probably his best work 5cm and GoW aside.

>>152072330
>I can't objectively decide which is better
Please fuck off

>>152072999
I'm sorry that I'm aware of my own bias.

I feel sorry for those that aren't though.

>>152073044
No I mean stop fucking confusing objectivity for subjectivity. There is never room for interpretation with objectivity. Triangles will always have 3 fucking sides; this is an objective concept. You're confusing your own logic.

>>152073107
Sperging out about 'tivities is way gayer than talking about them. Set your autism aside and think about what he's actually saying.

Shinkai's best and only watchable film is She and Her Cat.

File: 1479657443435.jpg (117KB, 794x719px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 794x719px

>>152073044
>objectively decide
This meme again

>>152070086
For me it is Hoshi no Koe, Your Name, 5wallpaper/s and then foot fetish the anime.

Kodomo and that cloud anime are both trash.

Kimi no Na wa. > 5cm Per Second > Garden of Words > The Place Promised in Our Early Days > Voices of a Distant Star > Children Who Chase Lost Voices

>>152073107
>>152073215
You can choose or chose not to look at something objectively. Art can absolutely be judged objectively as long as you're capable of it. I can confidently claim to be able to do that. I can also look at something and be completely subjective about it. I'm not acting elitist or anything, it's just a certain skill that you can gain with enough experience.

>>152070086
No your name is a much better film, a lot more pure too, now creepy foot fetish or pedophilie(west). I can't show this shit to normies, but your name is accessible to all.

>>152074209
It can be judged objectively if you take a moral stand like "more sales = better art" but you'd have trouble getting people to agree with you and I don't think you'd be able to argue for the truth of such a statement.

File: zzzzz.jpg (58KB, 479x600px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 479x600px

>shinkai

animated wallpaper with some shitty sentimental drama playing over it. an artist he may be, a filmmaker no.

>film
It's a shity anime flick

File: 1428172703018.png (75KB, 199x170px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 199x170px

Want some?

File: 1474250150023.png (113KB, 1107x599px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1107x599px

Nah man.

>>152072330
>like 2 of his movies which were panned by fans for being beautiful but boring
>don't like his new movie which has been breaking box-office records, soon to become Japan's highest grossing animated film and is critically acclaimed everywhere
And this is why I can't take Shinkai fans seriously

>>152074461
Sales? I'm sorry but I don't think you understand what I'm talking about here. You should first learn how art is judged in general before trying to argue about this.

>>152074676
>say I didn't like it when I never said

This is why I can't take shitposters seriously.


Honestly, I don't know if it's just contrarians who are desperate to hate on something popular, or if /a/ is that shit nowadays.

>>152075292
If you're not choosing something measurable, like sales which I used as an example, then you shouldn't be using words like "objective." I hate to be pedantic about this stuff, but you're triggering me.

Hosoda Mamoru is better

>>152075913
They're both shit.

>>152074209
>objective subjective I'm an intellectual

Critique itself is a subjective concept faggot. Your definition of "objective" is still subjective.

Objective analysis: This movie is 1 hour and 43 minutes.

Subjective analysis: This movie portrays the time period in a compelling and interesting way.

There is no "deciding" objectivity. When you look at a triangle it has 3 sides. This is objective reasoning.

>I can't objectively decide which is better
The reason people keep calling you a retard for saying this is because you clearly don't understand the meaning of objectivity.
Try saying "I can't objectively decide whether or not this triangle has three sides." It either has three sides or it is simply not a triangle therefore we see this is an objective concept.

The "skill" you talk about is an illusion. You simply consider your analysis to be more open minded and less tailored to your own personal tastes. Do not confuse this for objectivity.

You're confusing "I don't like this genre but I see production value in this series therefore it is objectively good." Art itself is a human construct. Humans interpret what art is and what isnt art. Therefore art is not an objective concept and therefore in order to have an equal intellectual discussion we must be aware of our own logic. The concept of critique "without bias" is an inherent contradiction. Bias is interpretation. Interpretation is critique. Subjectivity.

>>152070086
It's my favorite anime movie in general. I love everything about it, mostly how it shows so many emotions in very small things.
Haven't seen kimi no na wa yet yho.

post feet

>>152074676
So did Frozen and I thought it was a pretty average movie.

File: meme.png (142KB, 473x462px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 473x462px

>>152070086
>Garden of Words
>best anything

>>152070086
Every still from this movie looks pretentious, this shit looks way too far up Shinkais own asshole

>>152076381
>pretentious
wew this thread just keeps getting better.
is MAL raiding us?

>>152076525
At least it can apply correctly.
I'm still triggered by people praising Hibike's "character acting."

>>152076820
>triggered

File: 1482592860901.jpg (158KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1920x1080px

>You will never meet a depressed older woman with a taste disorder
>You will never mutually support each other through friendship and romantic subtext
>You will never make shoes for her
>You will never have her wear the shoes in an epilogue
>You will never be completely distraught when you find out she died in a meteor strike

>>152070086
It's pretty alright.

>>152076898
>You will never witness the legendary footjob that happened during the credits

>>152070086

>Let's face it, Garden of Words has been his best (and quite possibly only good) film to date.

>Man have weird obsession with design shoes
>Woman have weird no-sexual obsession with man
>Movie plot "adulthood is hard" only exist for appeal millenials

File: 1474644348710.jpg (28KB, 468x363px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 468x363px

>>152079333
>no sexual obsession

File: 1310245665-0cafd8f926b864b3df36917f1f8b49f4.gif (2MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x225px

>>152079333
>no sexual obsession

>>152076898
>you will never eat chocolate off her clean feet