>anime is better than manga/novel/original work Whats her name?

>>151706863
>>>/wsr/

JoJo easily

>>151706929
Is this a JoJo reference?

Most LN adaptations. LN is such a shitty fucking media for anything. Even VN's are better.

>>151706929
what the actual fuck stop posting while your drunk you stupid idiot

File: frdc.jpg (30KB, 143x212px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 143x212px

>>151706863
I know her name but I won't tell you.

>>151707993
>reading novels that's been translated

There's your problem. Out of anime/manga/LNs/VNs LNs suffer the most from loss in translation.

>>151708102
That doesn't make the media good even when untranslated.

>>151708153
The only reason you'd think that is if you don't like reading books. A lot people prefer to read the books instead of watching someone else's interpretation of it.

>>151706863
Part 2 of Jojo's Bizare Adventure, and select episodes of the other animated parts.

>>151708264
they're not books, they're just soft porn with lots of text

>>151706929
>>151708308
plebs

File: 1391928623318.jpg (2MB, 5000x3374px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5000x3374px

Golden candidate in this category.

>>151708316
Which is shit. Exactly.

>>151708102
>Young Adult tier fiction written by poorly educated authors for the masses (of students and other young people)
>common tags: supernatural, romance, harem, fantasy/scifi
>''''literature'''' that relies on pictures so that retards can imagine their waifus 'the right way'
It's not that hard to see why it's a shit medium. Your problem is you are reading shit.

>>151708356
too bad it's still garbage

Hunter x Hunter, mostly on account of Togashi's shit art

>>151708368
As a medium itself, LNs give you the raw character out of all the medium regardless of the quality. You lose a lot of that shit when you start skipping details, trying to imagine scenes and telling the story from an outside perspective.

There's a reason why the adaptation is almost always worse than the original, be it lack of 1 to 1 adaptation, lack of budget, lack/out of character.

Usagi drop

Gintama

>>151708660
I don't care for raw character if the character is there only to fill the checkboxes from a sheet (does it have a tsun/dere/yan/dan/kuuderes character, a childhood friend, rival, girl (male), best friend, father figure, mother figure, wise old teacher, etc.) or if they're the common stereotypical bullshit you find in LNs.
>and telling the story from an outside perspective.
You are aware not all narratives use a 1st person PoV, correct?

It's not even a matter of being better or worse. There's really little point in comparing an original with its adaptation. You get into the latter knowing they'll be flawed.

Fate/Pedo

>>151708356
Pretty much everything from KyoAni honestly.

>>151706929
I'd agree for Part 1 and 2 but the manga for 3 and especially 4 are superior to the Anime.

>>151708830
>You are aware not all narratives use a 1st person PoV, correct?

Yeah, it was just an example of how different the experience would be if you used a different media(other than maybe VN).

I admit, most LNs probably aren't written with great Japanese vocab but who cares, I read books to enjoy them. They also won't blow your mind with genres or characters you've never seen in anime. It's just a different way of consuming media, regardless of the quality. If it was about quality there's a lot of shit-tier mangas(even some popular mangas) that have awful stories or artwork.

Yama no susume
Non Non Biyori

File: OHHNOJonathanJoestas.jpg (51KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1024x576px

>>151706929
Everyone knows what the obvious answer is.
Comes to the thread to point out the obvious anyway.