Are you ready for the biggest disappointment of 2017?

>>150405691
Meh.
I hope it does alright so the manga sales get a boost.

I just want the merch

File: 1308869180306.jpg (98KB, 798x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 798x720px

Honestly I want him to make more money out of his series, Just throw most of the lewd scenes in an ova just like ilya did or even better just omit it because they will likely ruin the proportions

>>150405839
From what I hear manga authors make fuckall out of Anime profits, just a fairly meager licensing fee.

>>150405839
If you want him to make more money buy the manga, that's only proper way for him to get it

File: 1443244148052.png (821KB, 829x672px) Image search: [Google]

821KB, 829x672px

>>150405691
That's not my birthday.

>>150405705
It'll flop because of the poor production and the manga don't really need a boost, it's already quite popular.

>>150405691
Anyone have the livestream archive an anon made?

>>150405952
That was one author, who negotiated like a moron. If it's such a bad deal, then there's no reason for an IP holder to let someone make an anime.

>>150406700
>implying most authors aren't just otaku at heart who just want to see their babies animated.

I think it's easy to see why people would take shit deals.

>>150405970
I do, kinda.

I can read Chinese so I was buying the Taiwanese version. However I can't find the first 5 volumes because they were sold out. Recently they started releasing later volumes without censorship.

I am hoping now there is an anime it would create enough demand for them to reissue earlier volume without censorship. I have bought a few volume with censorship but if they came out uncensored I will rebuy them as well.

The only number on the books I found (according to wikipedia) seen to hover around 20K to 30K or so in sales... which is pretty low.

>>150406615
It's not really popular at all.

>>150407001
In japan yes, not in the west.

>>150407062
It's popular enough to be stable but never has amazing sales.

>>150405691
We already know it'll disappoint, so it won't be the biggest

>>150405705
I don't think the author would give a shit about his sales, but the shit magazine company would. The author is not obnoxious faggot like the mangaka from tokyo shit ghouls. Faggot panders his shit fans on twishit and retarded fanfic shit and making even more retarded shit with his manga because of the fame.

I just hope hamada doesn't become like this faggot

File: kanaka.jpg (244KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 800x800px

If you spent 10 years drawing a manga with some of the best art in the industry how much would you ask for the anime rights?

>>150407388
>Kanaka skinny and not her milf body
what is this blasphemy

>>150405952
>>150406700

It was fucking Sorachi hideaki he's pretty much a veteran for Jump and knows what goes on behind the scenes.

>>150405691
>battle haremshit with fanservice
>disappointing anyone

Eh. Nobody really cares

>>150405952
Considering the anime will most likely suck and flop, it doesn't really matter.

File: JUST.jpg (122KB, 1024x712px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1024x712px

>>150405691

That's not LoGH remake

>>150405691
It will be like this:
>Most of the budget will go into the fights and shit.

>The lewdest and juiciest moments instead of having normal censorship will have a black screen.

I will go BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD!!! if they screw this up (and knowing what's happening these days, it will).

>>150405691
To be disappointed people would need to have positive expectations but the sourcefags are biased against the adaption as always and the manga's story isn't interesting enough to get anyone hyped by the synopsis.
Since the manga only really stands out because of its art the anime would have to have some pretty nice sakuga to appeal to anyone.

>>150405691
Meh, sure.

>>150405691
Why don't they just make an official hentai anime?

They will do an anime-original end because otherwise they won't even get to shoe girl

>>150405691
It can't be a dissapointment if we have no faith in it or expectations for it in the first place.

I thought that was Re:Zero.

>>150406700
Its the standard for manga authors. They do it because while they do want that licensing fee, the real money comes from the boosted manga sales an anime generates which the author recieves roualties from.

I'm not going to watch this, I'm not going to participate in threads.

I like too much this series to surrender to the normalfags and animeonlyfags.

>>150405691
How can it be a dissapointment if no one expects the anime to be good?
Expectations were already low since the annoncement, and with this first promotional image with over simplified color pattern and designs threw everything under the bus.

If anything I hope the anime to do a decent run at least, so Yoshikadu will get the recognition he deserves.

>>150405705
I want a Bakura hugpillow.

>>150407388
>some of the best art in the industry
Is this really how you see Hamada? I mean, he's good, but he's not that good.

Who is making it again?

What's this, google gives me nothing.

>>150415804
Not him but post ten (天) (10) manga with better art

File: 1440373333232.jpg (85KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 600x600px

>>150416447
>ten (天)

>>150405691
I remember when I asked him on his stream last year if it would get and anime, and he was like "that would be nice".

>>150405691
Of course it'll flop, nobody watches battle shonen adaptations.

>>150416447
Igarashi Daisuke, Matsumoto Taiyou, Yukimura Makoto, Itoh Yu, Tezuka Osamu, Matsumoto Jiro, Kasahara Tetsuro, Samura Hiroaki, Masato Hisa, Kato Shinkichi

>>150417218

Strange names for publications

>>150417218
Don't forget oh great!

>>150417218
>Igarashi Daisuke,
Barely on the same level
>Matsumoto Taiyou
Nope
>Yukimura Makoto
This guy has grown a lot. I'll give you this one.
>Itoh Yu
Never heard of them until now. Pretty good.
>Tezuka Osamu
LOL. Hell no. Might as well throw Walt Disney into this list.
>Matsumoto Jiro
His art is more meticulous than great. Filling up a panel with tiny shit doesn't make someone great.
>Kasahara Tetsuro
He's a'ight
>Samura Hiroaki
Straight up DECENT
>Masato Hisa
Never heard of him but Google shows me some great shit. I like this guy.
>Kato Shinkichi
He's alright

>>150418056
>Ogure Ito
Nope.


Not even Yusuke Murata? Takehiko Inoue? Masakazu Katsura?

>>150417218
>normalfag art
aside from Kasahara

File: 1402178887966.png (988KB, 1934x1400px) Image search: [Google]

988KB, 1934x1400px

>>150418620
>samura
>decent
>quoting murata as though his art isn't fucking lifeless
>using categorical statements over something subjective to begin with
Nigga I'm gonna shank you.

I've masturbated so much to this damn series.

It sucks the anime will inevitably be shit.

File: Lifeless Art.jpg (384KB, 1017x1500px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 1017x1500px

>>150418759
>Murata's art is lifeless
I have never before now seen a more incorrect statement. Once you get into the conversation of which artist is better you inevitably end up with categorical statements (If I understand how you're using that term). Like you said, it's all subjective. We're all more or less trying to force our artistic values on each other like missionaries.

File: before after.jpg (294KB, 702x964px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 702x964px

>>150418759
>>quoting murata as though his art isn't fucking lifeless

He's a master of expressions, character design and paneling. He's the opposite of lifeless you fucking retard.

>>150405691
something seems off about their character designs

>>150419138
> subjective

There is a difference between disliking a style and straight hating anything that isn't made by your favorite artist. It's called being retarded.

>>150416447
I can name ONE

>>150405691
It will not. It will be the new rises of ecchi battle harem again and bring more hype to the genre.

File: 1480091959977.gif (565KB, 557x800px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 557x800px

>>150419340

File: the power of suggestion.jpg (42KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 250x250px

>>150419371

ayyy

File: 52871749_p0.jpg (290KB, 1000x1399px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1000x1399px

>>150419340
>something seems off about their character designs
Yep, it's shit.

>>150418620
I know there's no accounting for taste, but some of the things you're saying just throw me off completely. How is Igarashi "barely on the same level" as Hamada? I don't see it. Comparing Tezuka to a mediocre artist like Disney is just insulting, he's a fantastic cartoonist and put out some really good shit (talking strictly about his art here). And what kind of standards puts Samura of all people as "decent"?
>Not even Yusuke Murata? Takehiko Inoue? Masakazu Katsura?
Murata is better than Hamada, sure, but I just didn't think of him when writing these guys out. Inoue and Katsura do absolutely nothing for me, despite their obvious skills, though I did like Katsura's work on Jiya. Sacrilege, I know.

>>150418622
What is that even supposed to mean?

>>150420607
Not that anon, but the other guys on the list goes more stylistically out there or just more loose. While the guy he lists have tighter art from a technical perspective. Its just a taste thing. I really like the technical aspect and I didn't like the scratchy line of some in the list, but that doesn't mean they are bad, just by the criteria for things that I like, I prefer Hamada's stuff.

Who do you think should voice Kiriha (or other characters for that matter)? I've always read her in Tamura Yukari's voice. If they pick anyone else for the anime I might just watch it just to preserve my mental image of her.

File: bat.png (2MB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x1200px

>>150421525

>>150421525
Maaya Sakamoto or Chiwa Saito (Chiwa Saito could do any of the best girls in this series honestly)

>>150405691
Manga is bad, what did you expect?

>>150419294
His expressions and character designs are nothing special though.

File: 014-015.png (747KB, 1601x1150px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 1601x1150px

>>150423595
They are, but seems like you're blind. Fubuki and Garou are especially masterpieces of perfect looking characters.

>>150424210
Nah. They look decent because Murata can draw attractive bodies not because of his skill as a designer.
When he doesn't stick to ONE's simplisitic designs his stuff tends to look cluttered and garish as you can see in the picture you posted.

>>150405691
>disappointment
What?

>/a/
Ok.

>>150425145
The designs are upgraded in case you didn't notice.

>>150405691
The less you expect from the anime, the more you will enjoy it.