I don't think it looks that bad.

File: GiTS.jpg (176KB, 2067x560px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 2067x560px

Look again.

>>149706698
I really don't like the way she's posed in that scene to be fair, the room could use a bit more feeling as well.

>>149706698
What's the purpose of a glowing bed?

>>149705621
>>149705621
>>149705621

Stay in one thread /tv/ cucks.

It will be good and you can't do anything about that.

>>149706698
>glowing bed
What was so hard about having a dark room with a bright window putting her dark silhouette in the center as a contrast?

It's a fucking beautiful shot, it's easily recreated in live action, and more important it doesn't look like fucking shit . . . which is what they went with instead. Shit.

>>149706698
The movie is gonna be shit but bitching over a single minor frame is just pushing it.

Remind me of mangafags who shit on a single bad frame of an anime

>>149707794
Woah it's almost like visual presentation in a visual medium is an important thing I mean what the fuck, right?

>>149706698
Not much sky. Everything looks really dark and depressing. The Animu version is better.

>>149707839
>a single irrelevant frame
>in a movie that will have gazillion frames
>this deems it as unwatchable

Wew the nitpicking

Atleast complain about the thing that matters like Majors actual character being butchered

>>149706493
I'll judge it after I watched it.

>>149707957
>a single irrelevant frame
I know this may be hard for a retard who only watches modern powerpoint slides disguised as "anime" to understand, but that is not a "frame". It's called a "shot". It is comprised of multiple frames, you dumb fuck. And it's a terrible shot.

>>149708009
Yes keep bitching about a "shot" that'll last 2 seconds in a 2 hour film

>>149706493
I'm mad about the new back story. They changed Makoto into Jensen.

>>149708055
>last 2 seconds
It's an establishing, mood setting shot. Those last around 8 seconds, actually.
>in a 2 hour film
Consisting of terrible shots just like this one with terrible lighting and camerawork, because if they can't even bother giving a decent promotional presentation, what the fuck do you expect from the end product?

>>149708104
>It's an establishing, mood setting shot.

Which you're assuming will be the only one in the film like that even happened in the 1995 film. The one you're bitching over didn't even last 8 seconds in the original scene either.

File: 1477722917634.jpg (134KB, 499x431px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 499x431px

>>149708064
So that's where I've heard this story before!