QUALITY thread?
>>149416747
ITT: Newfags
>>149416893
>quality code
I don't know what was worse about the show, the visuals or the constant engrish.
>>149416941
That looks more like Osamu Kobayashi's preference for loose drawings.
>>149416747
>mfw watching this while listening to speed metal
>>149416747
>kissanime
Fuck you.
>>149417038
I didn't make the webm
also
>streaming anime
>>149417049
It's called sakuga, you wouldn't understand
>>149417049
I like this artstyle, doesn't look bad at all
and the clothes are drawn really well
>>149417103
not quality, just smearing
>>149417083
>he thinks rotoscoping is good
>>149417116
literally impossible to tell something is rotoscoped when it's not in motion
>>149417119
>>149417103
stop posting, this shit isn't QUALITY
>>149417129
Well, as someone who watches the series I can confirm the entire scene was rotoscoped. It looked so out of place. I didn't want ZEXCS to rotoscope again and they did.
Where do you draw the line between QUALITY and charismatic animation?
>>149417186
when it's shitty still frames as opposed to well drawn smeared inbetweens
>>149417177
I watched the episode too and I don't think it was rotoscoped. There's nothing about the movements that look uncannily realistic either.
>>149417211
Nah it was definitely rotoscoped. I recognised the movements thanks to Aku no Hana
>>149417258
The movements are nothing like Aku no Hana's though. The scene is animated by Osamu Tanabe who is good at realistic animation, but even in the episode the movement wasn't very realistic to begin with.
>>149417301
It was very Aku no Hana Anon. The way everyone swayed around confirms rotoscoping.
>>149417312
If anything, it could have had a live-action reference but it doesn't look traced over. The swaying movement isn't something that can't be done by conventional 2D animation.
>>149417312
Maybe if you keep saying it, it'll be true!No, it won't. You're just wrong.
>>149416757
>>149417049
>>149417103
>>149417119
>>149417147
>>149417166
>>149417197
>>149417219
>>149417248
This isn't QUALITY, stop.
>>149417541
how can this even get past quality control?
and how can you even fuck this up with digital coloring
>>149416747
This QUALITY thread is QUALITY in itself.
>>149417756
I hope someone was fired for this.
>>149417177
ZEXCS never learns. Even after going through that animator training project years ago they still go back to rotoscope.
>>149417846
Everytime.
>>149417541
I am a great magician
Now your clothes are yellow!
Most stuff in this thread just looks slightly bad...
>>149418482
Stream it, if you're so great!
>>149417788
I'm sure I've watched this, but can't remember what it's from.
>>149417197
How can such a terrible drawing be put over such a beautiful background....
>>149420311
Can you explain what's wrong with that screenshot? I watched all of Rail Wars and never noticed what's wrong with that building.
>>149422622
look at the cars
>>149422622
The cars.
>>149416747
Some fresh QUALITY.