Why are lolis so verboten?

Dangerous mods tonight.
Deleting threads left and right.

File: martin-1.png (41KB, 624x330px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 624x330px

pic related

File: 1408471968708.webm (3MB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x480px

>>149337129
You must be new.

>>149337098
Because they're dangerous and will morally corrupt our children.

>>149337098
I thought verboten meant they talked a lot.

>>149337152
>>149337098
Can't search for webms or croppd images

File: 1424729730992.webm (2MB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x480px

>>149337248
Ohh?
That's a shame.

File: 56478834_p3.jpg (83KB, 629x800px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 629x800px

>>149337098
Because lolis are very dangerous, and shouldn't be allowed near adult men.

>>149337248
If you don't know what OP's image is you need to lurk forever

File: verboten_001_original_kc.png (242KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 800x800px

>>149337195
"Verboten" is German for "forbidden".

>>149337298
Is it currently all the rage on some other board?
I just saw it mentioned in a different thread as well.

>>149337098
>>149337152
>>149337273
Source is Kodomo no Jikan
http://kissanime.to/Anime/Kodomo-no-Jikan

>>149337340
It's a shitty /v/ meme like calling everything a Jojo reference

>>149337129
Striprism, made up show from Akiba's Trip.

>>149337334
>>MUH sekret klub LMAO xD
It just means you don't watch a lot of anime if you don't know this extremely popular and well known anime
and by extremely popular and well known, we don't mean on normie sites like where ever you're from, we mean on here
So either stop complaining that nobody wants to cater your 4chan experience and just learn how to actually find things out

fucking hell, just go to /r/ instead of complaining, that is literally what the board is for

File: 000050 --- 2016-11-03 09_31_39.png (103KB, 1208x290px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1208x290px

>>149337340
There wouldn't be any reason to that I know of. You probably just saw the term recently and became conscious of it, then saw it again in a normal interval, but were conscious the second time, which strongly reinforces a held belief.

http://skepdic.com/confirmbias.html

>>149337370
Both term and usage of the word "verboten" on /a/ dates back far longer than that. The image I posted is at least 4 years old, the post I show in this post is more than 8 years old.

>>149337407
Im pretty sure this is always repeated by the same guy.
>Step 1. post some sourceless cropped image, preferably porn
>Step 2. wait giddily to someone to fall into the trap
>Step 3. get your fix by complaining about the source questions

>>149337468
>You probably just saw the term recently and became conscious of it,
It's in a currently ongoing thread, >>149337123, posted by a self-declared crossboarder.

>strongly reinforces a held belief.
I asked a question. That is not a held belief, it's a suspicion.

>>149337273
I wish the anime would have been better and covered the whole series.

File: 59770203_p0.png (441KB, 950x1346px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 950x1346px

has your loli ever messed with your monitor's contrast settings?

>>149337152
Do girls actually do this shit to each other?

Jesus fucking christ

>>149337514
Opinions and suspicions are both true beliefs, which are the counterparts to knowledge.

Read the article on confirmation bias I linked. As it will show you, everyone falls prey to it, and you might see what other checks are lacking as of now to transform the observation, that someone posted the word in this and someone in another thread, into useful data.

>>149337661
You are completely ignoring what's going on, and just marching ahead obliviously triumphant like a smug little girl.

I do not support the belief that verboten is a crossboarder meme. I have seen a pattern, and I have asked others if they can tell me more about what's going on, or if anything is going on at all.
Now shut the fuck up.

>>149337370
>It's a /v/ meme
go outside and experience life

>>149337708
Kinda funny that you say that, since you're the one that keeps on being way too focused on the word "belief". I already intentionally cut it short in the second post, because the actual intent of my posts were to suggest a possible explanation of your perceived pattern, which might've just been unstructured data, and to hint to you what would be necessary to confirm the pattern.

>>149338158
You know what I found funny?
You probably recently ran across the confirm bias and now you are trying to force it onto the first instance where you see a pattern. You are basically falling for it while warning others not to fall for it.
Please just shut up.

>>149338187
You're free to believe that, if that narrative makes you happy.

>>149338248
And you're free to deny it. Isn't that great?

Could someone that watched Cardcaptor Sakura tell me why it's so popular? I haven't watched it yet, but it looks so polished.

>>149338498
>it looks so polished
Did you download a degrained version?

>>149338580
Just meant that it seems to have high production values. I then wondered why it looks that way to me, whether it was because of the budget or the art style.

>>149337248
>>149337129
>>149337352
Lurk for 2 years before posting.