You have the option to delete one Jojo part from history. Everything

None. I like JoJo the way it is. I like some parts more or less than others but I've more or less liked every part.

>>146636981
Why would you delete any? It's a good manga that manages to get better as it goes along even after 30 years and none of it is actually bad, let alone bad enough to be better off without.

>>146637137
I generally have liked every part of Jojo but I really am not liking part 8 at all and think it's starting to go from silly and over the top to just straight up dumb.

>>146637254
Where are you up to? It's meant to be a mystery story so we won't know 100% what's going on until near the end. And it hasn't been overly silly, everything with the Rock Humans has been really intense and well done, 8 has probably the best balance between the comedy and seriousness in the series.

>>146637071
/thread
If I had to pick one I disliked part five the most
Even still I liked a lot of the characters and enjoyed the part just not as much as any of the others

>>146637417
I like the mystery aspects and the atmosphere but the main character himself is who I'm not a fan of. I find Josuke incredibly boring as a character and find his backstory generally pretty dumb.

I wouldn't erase it or anything I just like it less than the other parts.

I really don't like part 5, I might considering actually erasing it from existence.

Part 5. It's literally just filler.

>>146636981
What happens if I erased Stardust Crusaders? Would Josuke even have a Stand or would he have the Ripple?

>>146639015
This also means I erased everything else in the timeline since one of the events in Stardust Crusaders is Dio coming back and it's because of Dio that we have all the shit in 4, 5, and 6.

>>146639015
>>146639114
>erase Phantom Blood
>Jojo stops existing

File: MFW MFCNT.gif (2MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x500px

>>146639258
NOW WE'RE TALKING!

>>146637975
>>146638900
B-But, no part 5 means no Purple Haze Feedback.

File: diavolo-1-jpg[1].jpg (108KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 640x360px

Part 5.

>>146636981
Part 5. It's not bad, but there isn't much lost from the timeline if you remove it.

>>146636981
Is this how MiH works?

>>146641576
No. It's how King Crimson works.

Even the part I like the least still has neat stuff in it, fuck.

I guess JJL, since it's not done yet and we clearly didn't see the best part yet.

>>146638900
>>146641154
You can say the exact same thing about Part 4.

How does Act 3 work

>>146639258
>>146639015
>>146639114
>characters will still show up in other parts if they do appear at all past their own, but they are introduced as new characters instead of returning ones.

read the post retards

>>146642541
It uses 「Gravity」

>>146638900
>>146641154
If you're reading Jojo for the overarching plot then 2 and 4 should also be considered filler.

>>146642541
Wordplay, it rhymed "three" and "freeze"

>>146643168
>part 2 villains are indirectly responsible for Dio being a vampire
>filler

>>146643263
And Diavolo is responsible for the stand arrows, so Part 5 can't be considered filler.

>>146636981
Jorge Joestar.
The only correct answer.

>>146636981
6.

>>146642655
>Everything in it, all the characters and places, all the events, EVERYTHING will disappear.
You read the post yourself, retard.

>>146643322
but fitness gods are actually a good answer to the mystery, ayylien meteors aren't a good answer to stands

part 5 or 6
mostly 5