Just 6 more weeks!
>>145208844
and 6 more months for subs
Since I read the manga I could watch the raw and I just want to fap to Ueno.
>>145208844
>shoujo shit
nah
>>145212051
What are you quoting?
>>145210054
>6 more months
If we're lucky, for raws.
>>145210380
Raws are still 6 months out. No one's getting camrips.
>>145212220
>now
>>145212051
>published in Weekly Shonen Magazine
>>145213355
>written by a woman
>>145213459
>>145213739
>implying females don't have a different perception of aesthetics than males and what is perceived as shoujo shit will generally seep into their creative work
>>145213459
What do you get out of playing retarded?
>>145213915
>gets told
>resorts to insults
>>>/tumblr/
>>145213949
>gets told
Literally what
>>145214025
It's shoujo shit because it has the traits of shoujo shit due to the fact of being written by a woman.
QED
>>145214398
It literally doesn't matter where it's published because shounen magazines also publish shoujo shit and fujoshit bait these days. Reader demographics aren't nearly as clear cut. In the end, you'll have to live with the fact that this piece of garbage has the traits of shoujo shit due to being written by a woman.
>>145214463
That's cool and all, but it's still shounen.
>>145214522
Calling it by a different name doesn't change its nature.
>>145214583
Exactly. Calling it shoujo doesn't change the fact that it's shounen, glad we could finally settle this.
>>145214640
The point is that it has the traits of shoujo garbage due to written by a woman. You can call it by any name you want - it won't change what it is. If you published Nana in a shounen magazine would make it shounen pro forma, but it wouldn't affect that it has the characteristics typically associated with shoujo.
>>145215133
>You can call it by any name you want - it won't change what it is.
Yes, we've already been through this, it still remains shounen no matter how hard you cry and spew buzzwords about it.
>>145215291
You've lost the argument ages ago and resorted to debating semantics. I can only repeat: calling it shounen does not affect that it possesses the traits of shoujo shit due to the fact of being written by a woman. You might as well call Twilight poetry, it's not going to affect what it is.
>>145216548
>You might as well call Twilight poetry,
Except that Twilight is objectively and categorically not poetry, while Koe no Katachi objectively and categorically is shonen. The elements contained in the work and it's quality are wholly unimportant.
>>145216650
Again: you're debating semantics. The fact that it's serialised in a shounen magazine doesn't change that it doesn't possess the traits of traditional shounen manga. Classifications based on serialisation make no sense in modern times when demographics aren't as separated as they were. I already told you: you're free to call it shounen if you will, but it's not going to change the fact that it has more in common with what is generally associated with shoujo manga.
>>145216548
"It's shoujo shit" isn't an argument, you were already wrong to begin with.
>>145216902
It's not an argument, it's a fact. Disguising it via serialisation in a shounen magazine doesn't change what it is.
>>145216949
You're confusing your autismal opinion with fact.
>>145217029
That's your opinion but it's not going to change the facts. This discussion has been getting a bit boring though, so we'll end it here. Enjoy your told.
>>145217438
You being retarded and pretending your opinion is fact was bound to be uninteresting.