Who sock fetish here?
Hmph. What about touching?
also bare feet are gross. Feet are only tolerable when covered.
Wish artists would draw them with more detail.
I have a sock fetish but it's more of an extension of a leg fetish than a foot fetish.
You best post source since google is shit at img search now.
I mostly focus on barefoot shots, but I do have a couple of sock-related shots.
Who are the best stocking fetish artists?
the best ones I know are Shinooka Homare, Oouso and Akaza
And this, if stockings count.
>I'm starting to develop a foot fetish thanks to socks
I'm perfectly fine with this
That one scene where Ruri tells the MC to rub her feet.
Forgot I had this one.
Someone post that shot of Rin's socks from UBW
>bare feet are gross. Feet are only tolerable when covered.
I literally only entered this thread to post that opinion. This is exactly true. I don't think that means I have a sock fetish, but socks are always better than no socks.
Use the tools you have available, anon. This isn't the stone age anymore.
You can give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. You can give a man a fishing rod, and he'll eat for life.
I'm not the original anon. If he tried to find it but failed, there's no issue with giving him the source. I don't know why you wouldn't want someone to enjoy the same thing you enjoyed. You're just being a pedant at this point.
Lurking has nothing to do with finding sources. You could be here for years and there would be a time where you cannot find the source at all. Instead of trying this hard, think for youself a little.
>If he tried to find it but failed,
He claims he failed. "reverse gives me nothing" might just be a fig leaf for idiots. many have lied about that before. Because there are many reverse searches (google, archive, saucenao, iqdb, wait, ex, ...) just claiming that it doesn't work hardly shows any effort at all.
>there's no issue with giving him the source
give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime
He knows how to fish already. Granted, you will never know whether he is lying or not, but I, myself, have also had moments where none of the searches worked, so I can, at the very least, empathise with that anon. At that point where the anon already tried to find it himself, refusing to give source is just silly. Who are you trying to prove yourself to?
In any case, he got his source from a kinder anon, who decided to not be a finicky piece of work. For every person who thinks like you, there will be at least others who think the opposite. Just like the anons in OPTs.
>He knows how to fish already.
No, he doesn't. I searched out of curiosity and found the source within seconds.
>none of the searches worked
Doesn't apply to this situation.
>At that point where the anon already tried to find it himself
I understand your point, but spoonfeeding is only warranted when people actually put in some fucking effort, rather than just doing a GIS, throwing your hands up, and running here to get spoonfed. Part of being a responsible adult is learning to do things for yourself. Obliging this kind of behavior stunts self-improvement, leads to further request/recommendationfagging, and worse, leads others to believe that this sort of behavior is encouraged. There's no need for you to defend someone who didn't even try.
Indeed, spoonfeeding shouldn't be encouraged, but not being able to find the source, while using all the searches, does and can apply to this situation. If google has an idea of what you read and watch (history, cache etc.), you'd be able to find the source much easier. That's why one individual will be able to find the source while the other is unable. How can you tell whether the person put a load of effort and couldn't find it?
Point is, there are certain situations where giving the source isn't wrong. I'm not disagreeing with you.
If someone tried to find the source of this image and was unable, I wouldn't mind giving them the artist name.
>Point is, there are certain situations where giving the source isn't wrong.
This isn't one of them. I often check whether something can be found before telling someone to fuck off.
If anon wants extended fishing lessons he should say so.
>i tried google, but ...
At least I could tell him why that's the wrong tool. But when he just says "lol, reverse search gib nutting!" then all I can do is roll my eyes because that statement is so generic that it's like there's only a single type of reverse search in existence. It just signals no effort an outright lie.
>but not being able to find the source, while using all the searches, does and can apply to this situation
As I said before, he clearly didn't use all of the searches because I was able to find it using iqdb. Google is not the only search engine. But since that's all in the past, I'll agree to disagree.
Me. Though I hate it when people take it as a foot thing and not a leg thing.
They already do.
I'm not really disagreeing with you, just pointing out that there are some exceptions.
meant for you >>144206831
Can't you see we are discussing sauce policies and regulations.
Feet are the icing atop the cake that is the beautiful lower half, while a nice ass is good, a pair of nice legs are a vital ingredient to the dish, gly feet is the same as drenching the dish in a single sauce, ruining the entire dish. The feet are important, and their adornments all the same.
While the ass can be a separate entity in many cases, the feet are even more vital with their interpersonal relationship with the legs; a long, slender, soft pair of legs must be adorned with equally attractive feet, without this cohesion, all might as well be gone.