>legendary King Arthur patrayed as male in history books
>turns out to be a female
Why is this allowed?
do real dragons have four legs and wings or two legs and wings?
do real werewolves turn into a normal-looking wolf or a bipedal wolf-humanoid?
do vampires weaken in sunlight or sparkle?
it's fiction anon. you can do what you want with it.
>draw a girl
>call it king arthur
Why is this allowed?
King Arthur is old and busted. Atilla is the new hotness.
It depends on lores though. Left is dragon, right is wyvern.
>king arthur it's real and not the oldest british fanfiction of all time about a overrated norman king
The Nasuverse is weird. After all, lanklet is portrayed as a shota.
you are confusing fiction with myth.
dragon and wyvern and drake all have cultural origins which largely define what they are.
Just because a video game gets it wrong, it doesn't mean its okay.
it is you retard
the author get to decide what fiction he want to do.
if he decide USA is a nation of white cucks who loves to whore their womenfolks to brown people for crack money, it's perfectly fine.
because it's fiction you dumbfuck. as in not real.
>Small discrepancies in the myth mean he's fictional
>Literally can't be placed in a century because there's so much different stuff and conflicting writings on him, but is somehow still real.
> a concept
try a fiction
and people can use it in whatever way they want
it is protected under law of the free and great
now go away and get cucked by Jamals while I make sure Trump build a wall to keep faggots like you away.
>make a shitty game/cartoon
>want people to play/watch it
>fill it with slutty girls
>draw a slutty girl
>call her a ship
>or a plane
>or a gun
>or a boy
>or 700 year old dragon
>or a historical figure
>you will never have a cute tomboy teddy roosevelt waifu who teaches you how to be a man.
Because it's a fine enough tweest. Really, it's not even bad.
Artoria is primarily the result of an artist wanting to draw more cute grills, but it works well enough for the narrative and honestly it makes F/SN much more distinctive as a story than it would be otherwise.
As a Britfag, I am 100% okay with a totally made up character from our country being used this way. Most Arthurian literature was essentially fanfiction after a certain point anyway.>>138664655
Saber doesn't bother me that much, but Enkidu does. Just look at this shit. They missed the whole point of his character. Two nukes wasn't enough.
>Artoria is primarily the result of an artist wanting to draw more cute grills
Nope. Artoria was gonna be a man, shirou a girl. Producer slapped the idea down because harem sells better than romance story.
that's the point you dumbass
you can say whatever you want.
and it's perfectly fine.
fiction isn't true.
this image say it well.
>insisting fictional things must follow the same rules every time
It ultimately made the story better, though, and more notable.
The adventures of notRin the original protag while she chooses between Gil, Cu and Arthur just sounds like a typical shoujo affair. A universe where being Cu isn't necessarily suffering would be cool and all but I'm glad F/SN ended up as it did.
Yamato is not a slutty girl, Yamato is pure, Yamato is QTest
>shitter Japs whine about piracy
>underpaid, overworked coding/drawing monkeys STILL produce shit
>rely on otakus to pour more money into their hobby than it is worth
>most of those "epic" 2d porno games are made with fucking RPG Maker
All that effort, to produce shit and make minuscule profits. Contrary to what Japan believes, determination is garbage on its own.
Your waifu is a slut, a shit, and not real.
Japan sexualizes saints, do you think they would give a fuck about some worthless British kingu?
IT'S /JEANNU/ TIME!!!
EVERYONE KILL A DIRTY BRIT!