How popular would Momo be if she didn't have her power?

I want to cum all over Momo.

>>135028034
Shaft+Jin literally ruin this shit
This was fucking wasted potential , the project.

>>135028460
Would you cum on Momo, though?

This shit any good family?

>>135028460
>wasted potential
Are you serious? Saying that means you know what it had potential to be in the first place, which implies you understand kagepro. Understanding kagepro is impossible.

>>135028034
Kyoani should've made this.
And I will totally ravage Momo's body.

>>135029212
I'm having a hard time visualizing how that would turn out. Being made by Kyoani that is. It is very easy to imagine ravaging Momo's body.

>>135028622
Only if you ignore the anime completely and read the manga/novels. The songs are good too.

>>135028622

I stopped at like episode 6 or 7 because i couldn't understand it nor did it interest me.

I can't even remember what it was about any more.

>>135029380
People who have watched the anime, read the manga, read the LN, and analyzed all of the songs only have guesses as to what it is about.

>>135028622
First listen to the album, then light novels, after you've done that proceed to the anime. You'll get a better understanding. Or, simultaneously listen to the album and read the LN.

>>135029616
The anime changes the context of all the songs though. So does the manga, but only in the very recent chapters.

>>135028622
Kill yourself.

>>135030418
But it's not August 15th yet.

>>135029313
Probably cleaner desings, and a "We're making this to sell money, fuck the franchise" instead of the beautiful CG episode.

>>135033241
Are you saying that Kyoani is bad at preserving the plot of the things they adapt, or something else?

>>135033616
KyoAni is generally bad at actually adapting things. They have a habit of adding original characters or removing cast members when they adapt their own in-house material.

>>135034567
That's what I thought you would say. If it's in-house, isn't it logical to assume the impetus against doing that is lower? On something this high profile, they would be as careful as possible, wouldn't they?

>>135029109
Not the guy you replied to but I don't agree. You can see something's potential before you fully understand it. Visionaries do exactly that, and early adopters to a lesser extent