Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Since there's been a debate over whether or not to set up a /l/ board, I have a question: what exactly constitutes a "loli"? Is it matter of age, or appearance?
For example: Misty from Pokemon is stated to be 10 (which is underage), yet she looks around 14 (which is less underage, but still underage). Of course, neither have stopped the Internet from drawing R34 of her. Is she a loli?
Then there's a character like Sailor Moon, who is stated to be 14 (which is underage) but looks around 18 (which is not underage). Once again, neither has stopped the creation of hentai. Is she considered a loli?
Would you say it would be better not to create /l/ since the FBI is starting to crack down on you guys (after sites like Paheal and the Foundry cleaned up their act)? Are you getting nervous?
>>
Loli is a body type.
>>
And the FBI isnt cracking on shit, loli is legal there is nothing to be nervous about.
Those sites are pussy faggots.
>>
They're fictional characters so they have no 'age'
It's about body type, think about why that '1000 years old vampire' justification is such a joke around here.
>>
>>134135895
only for image tagging retards
>>
>bumping this garbage thread
>>
>>134136006
For everyone.
>>
>>134135641
>Since there's been a debate over whether or not to set up a /l/ board
That debate was ended years ago.
Not going to happen.
>>
>>134136044
no it was never used like that before image tagging
>>
>>134136468
I dont care about image taggin it was always a body type
>>
>>134136546
for retards yes
keep showing how stupid you are
>>
>>134136591
Whatever you say faggot.
>>
File: paradigm.png (18KB, 450x528px) Image search:
[Google]
18KB, 450x528px
Left is 14 years old.
Right is 1200 years old (vampire)
Clearly the loli is the girl on the right.
Checkmate.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2