/a/ is fate historically accurate when it comes to the servants?

>>124346642
most are altered

>>124346642
not really, but if you're asking whether or not Alexander had parades then yes, he did

File: Gilgamesh.jpg (212KB, 600x901px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 600x901px

>>124346642
>Blond and skinny Gilgamesh
No.

>>124348138
On the same token

Big bearded Alexander

Ha ha ha, no

File: AlexandertheGreat.jpg (21KB, 343x480px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 343x480px

>>124348260
What is the point of using historical figures if you're just going to turn them into something completely different from the original anyway?
Pretty sure they could have made big bearded, lion hugging Gilgamesh and regular Alexander work.

>>124348260
King Arthur being a fcking frail 15 year old girl.

>>124348404
Because character designers need to get paid and they needed a bara character for demographic reasons.

>>124348404
Regular Alexander is a manlet tho

>>124348445
When will they learn

>>124348434
Then use Gilgamesh. Just look at his fucking statue.
>>124348445
Everyone was a manlet back then by today's standards.

>>124348511
He was a manlet even by his era's standards.

File: 1418786665572.jpg (112KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1280x720px

>girl that nukes entire armies and knows how to perform fellatio is actually King Arthur
>Astolfo is a slutty trap
>Nero is an Arthur clone with big tits
What do you think?