Scanlation Thread

"No"

>>122013170
?

File: ss+(2015-03-03+at+09.20.52).jpg (365KB, 1936x1096px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 1936x1096px

Just some nsfw beach sex KyouSaya doujin.

File: 1423258371413.jpg (357KB, 2048x1972px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 2048x1972px

>>122014176
>tfw want to get back to typeset whatever but cant find any motivation.

>>122014176
don't level with adjustment levels cuz you're killin a lot of details

>>122014629
What else is there, ctrl+l?

>>122014779
ya

man super-hq scans are daunting

Can I "steal" manga from another group if it hasn't been touched for more than a year?

What doujin do people want to see translated?

>>122015132
yeah, what manga anon?

>>122014830
That's the same exact thing. The only difference you think you're seeing is the anti aliasing. When you export an image all the layers are merged and the anti aliasing will happen regardless.

>>122015132
You can do it whenever, if they aren't translating then it's their fucking fault.

>>122015132
You're more than welcome if it was scanlated by S2scans or Japanzai.

>>122015169
not if you're using hq raws

for example, if i use adjustment levels at 8000px height and resize screentones will be really destroyed as oppose to level directly on the page which doesn't affect screentones if you don't fuck it up.

my work is /a/. I do it for the community.

>>122015614
This is why we don't need to need so many scanlation threads. Because they attract wanna be try-hards like this guy. And they try to show off when giving wrong advice.
Here. The raw, one leveled with adjustments, and one leveled with commands. You will not be able to tell which is which.
https://www.mediafire.com/?lh25zu788v3ntbo

Again, all you think you're seeing is the anti aliasing that happens when you merge layers.

Also, stop typing like shit. If you want to advocate quality, don't type like you have downs syndrome.

File: -011.png (205KB, 812x1150px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 812x1150px

>>122015972
ok do whatever the fuck you want, and of course you won't see any shit if you're resizing at fucking 3000px.

>>122017017
You fucking murdered that page with blur, and it looks awful. Those aren't even the original tones. And you're down scaling to mangafox resolutions. Please consider never scanlating again.

>>122017017
Come on anon, surely you can easily see all the detail lost on that page to three tones of gray grid-lines.

File: 1422155025486.gif (143KB, 246x238px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 246x238px

>>122017235
>mangafox resolutions
>doesn't know about 1300-1100px standards

holy fuck i didn't knew you were that new to cleaning

>>122017267
here's the psd if anything i'm recovering details from the fucking raw.

http://www.mediafire.com/download/ncjk9rw33arsr6k/-011.psd

File: Untitled-1.png (279KB, 1186x704px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1186x704px

>>122017657
>shitposting loudly in ignorance
Why are all scanlation threads so bad now? What attracts people like you?

The physical page doesn't even look like that.
There is also no such standard. You're talking about the size readers downscale to. Which is shit quality.

Like, whatever you're doing, it's not cleaning. You're fully removing parts of the page and adding in new things. Not only that, you didn't even use the ruler tool to straighten the page.
>inb4 I- I was just doing a rush job!

>>122017994
>There is also no such standard.
>the size readers downscale to. Which is shit quality.
>doesn't know that batoto exist

And i'm the ignorant. But yeah, you're right, no such standart exist and you just leave the page at a size of a fucking movie theather kek.

>>122019145
>I'm gonna keep bumping my shit thread from page 10 and you can't stop me!
>thinking 'kek' is just a topological version of 'lol'
/a/ is dead. I'm pretty sure reddit might be better now.
Batoto is a reader, you fucking moron. "Reader" is short for "Online reader." Not the people reading it.

Just because you're poor and have phone sized monitor doesn't mean all people do.

Here's some common sense for you. And image can always be down scaled without losing quality, but you can not upscale an image with out ruining it.

So if you want read at a tiny resolution you're free to do so, and if people who care about quality want it higher it caters to them as well. There is literally no reason at all to down scale. Not file size. Because a 16bit color depth page at 3000px is less than one MB.

File: KMB_DoJi_Page_03.jpg (1MB, 4300x6000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4300x6000px

I have a questions for translators.

Do any of you study translation theory?
I've been reading up on translation and it's interesting as hell.

why would you need to redraw manga?

>>122021169
Speech bubbles

>>122019532
The vast majority of people still read online, and no one wants to wait for huge pages to load just because one person wants to justify paying for a big monitor.

>>122023186
>The vast majority of people still read online
Fuck those people.

File: ss+(2015-03-03+at+04.51.30).jpg (340KB, 1382x744px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1382x744px

>tfw buy the magazine to save the color pages and then it's in the volume with better quality

>>122023186
>implying only one person cares about image quality
>>>/global/rules/6
>it takes a long time for less than a single MB of information to load
So not only do you have a ghetto monitor, your connection sucks, too.

A lot of people use VLC and read Twilight, does that make either of them acceptable?

I resize my releases to whatever size makes the screentones look best. Usually that's somewhere from 1200-1400. I really couldn't care less if someone whines about wanting it bigger, I'll just do what I think looks good.

>>122023451
What's that manga about?
That artist's other series ended rather badly because Tsubomi got axed.

>>122023861
Sort of a character-driven alien invasion story, I'm really not sure how to phrase it better. It seems to be one of the highest-rated series in the magazine it's in (Gessan), so it isn't getting axed anytime soon. There's no yuri if that's what you're looking for, but I'd say it's definitely worth a read.

>>122023836
Nice damage control post.

Much like how you didn't know that command leveling and adjustment leveling are the same thing, the size of the image does not change the screen tones themselves.

Will you just admit you're pathetic already, and only in these threads to shitpost and try to show off your very meager knowledge.

>>122023967
Hm, sounds interesting enough. I'll have to look into it. Thanks.

>>122023982
I'm not the leveling anon, keep trying. And if you seriously think screentones look exactly the same at 1300 and 1400, you obviously haven't been cleaning for more than thirty seconds.

How difficult is it to learn how to clean? Are there any good tutorials for translation work stuff?

>>122024086
Sure you're not, you're just defending his retarded methods.

>>122024411
When did I say anything about leveling? I'm talking about how resizing to different heights produces different screentones.

>>122024677
Maybe you should use something that's not shit at scaling images to scale your images.

>>122024782
Okay, you obviously have no idea how screentones work. Moving on.

File: 1407400504619.png (48KB, 329x330px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 329x330px

>>122024782
Is this nigger serious?

>>122024677
Except they don't. And that's something really stupid to say because screen tones have nothing to do with image sizes.

Your ignorance shines through with all of your posts. Which is why it's obvious who you are.

As I said, damage control. You're at least trying to make yourself look right about the image size. Because you totally fucked up with the leveling thing.
>>122024844
>lol xd if I say you don't know how they work it means you don't

>>122024844
>>122024882
>exactly 60 seconds apart
Ha. Getting even more pathetic.

File: surething.png (54KB, 600x680px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 600x680px

>>122024930
You sound like the pathetic one here.
>inb4 you changed the html/css!