I'm not from this board, but I want to ask something to

>>558797
>Which is superior in terms of final quality?
Both are fantastic if you spend enough effort.

>Which is more expensive?
Due to the various software artists use, 3D is more expensive. (mocap gear, cameras, rendering software, animating tools, etc...)

>>558797
In a TV show context the shittiest 3D animation is probably (very slightly) cheaper than the shittiest 2D animation.

>>558797
Depends how much money you have for either.

2D is better quality if done right than 3D if done right. 2D is more expensive. 3D is less expensive.

>>558797
the cheapest thing is to combine the two

>>558880
You should really try google sometime.

3d is superior purely based on demand in the current market. There simply isnt enough work to justify being a purely 2d animator. But quality wise both can be great in their own way