Archived threads in /3/ - 3DCG - 52. page

>>558879

Better than my skills at the moment desu

>>558883
very thanks you

>>558879
>Bevel the edges for a better looking
>2 light sources minimum, (Do not use the same colour)
>Rendering with Alpha channel and compose it with a texture in the background i.e. a black courtine
To be honest i do not see anything wrong with your artwork, just giving some basic tips to improve it, nice work

>>560527
/ic/ seems to be the only place since its about drawing.

>>560527
theres /f/ but its mostly porn

>>560529
he already mentioned F, why did you mention it also?

>>558495
If you're using unity, this is pretty easy to do with some shader fiddling. I don't mean programming, I mean literally dragging and dropping uv maps into where you want them.

Take a quick browse through here;

https://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/Graphics.html

>>558495
(Get Substance Painter, Simplifies everything)
Make a specularity map so that it only highlights in certain predefined places

This is not how you 3d. If you don't like dealing with topology try sculpting

>>560132
I like dealing with topology, it's useful to easily get exactly the form you want.
What I don't like is dealing with mesh resolution, which box modelling really overcomplicates, but triangle modelling simplifies.

you literally cant model with triangels
unless you like to extrude verticies instead of edges

its 2 steps against one

UUUUUUUUUUUU I AM VELLY CHINEEESE

File: A.jpg (2MB, 3020x1868px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3020x1868px

>>555228
FUCK YOU

>>559809
Anon, I don't know how to tell you this but... you're lazy.

https://charactergenerator.autodesk.com/

>>559809
>I can't be bothered to model an anatomically correct character model and sculpt all the details on
Can't be bothered, or simply can't?

Just use daz like everyone else who can't model.

>>559809
Makehuman if you use Blender.

Since you're using zbrush, you're probably okay with some freemium thing like DAZ studio, or Autodesk Character Generator.

File: Untitled3.jpg (266KB, 1920x1028px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1920x1028px

>>559278
and as you can see it looks horrible

that's a good question, i've been wondering this for a while too. Let me know if you get any results op.

use Subdivision surface modifier or beveling?
(the latter seems the best since you want to keep those poly counts short)

more computers really
they never render their frames onsite, the usually contact a company that have enough firepower to render frames at reasonable time

Youre not very smart are you? You are comparing multimillion bidget 1000 man strong powerhouses to your milky self in your basement

>>560085
Movie was okay, 3D was pretty good though.

>>560122
Just got back from the Convention, did you?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=nick+wilde+3d+model+blender

>>560122
can such fur quality work in a video game without blowing up peoples computers?

>>560142
No, you can at best approximate it with fur planes, but if you look at the tail (both in the render and the blend file), it's just a puffball of super dense hair

File: zzzz1.jpg (86KB, 848x620px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 848x620px

the back side

you don't need to unify anything until the retopology phase.

when you are done with retopology merge all the lowpoly details and keep subtools separate then bake

>>559595
hm..
I've kinda almost done retopo on this part already,

so I should just merge all this, and then bake? and won't it be hard to rig?
or should I retopo all these parts as one mesh?


PS. thank you, for answering, man/lady !

wings3d is your last chance if blender is too heavy lol

pretty sure 2005 computer can run blender

>>558939
it's not that it was too heavy, it gave me an error like "nope, can't install on this computer".
It's something about the graphics, because i can run ableton live, photoshop (without the 3D thing the new ones have!) and a few other fairly heavy softwares. Not flawleslly, but still.

Gonna try this wings3d one. thanks

>>558940
it says it needs openGL, i know it won't run.
Could it be that with a driver update im able to run openGL? it's kinda ridiculous the shit im not being able to run because of this software gimmick

Yes, with literally any renderer from the past decade. Stupid thread dude.

get good with a 1 render of your choice and you can achieve that

>>560116
No, it's completely impossible.

watch what happens bitch

do it

bumpybump

Zremesher is awful. Good luck getting proper edge loops and not spirals out of that shit. Use only for static things.

I know how to clean something like that up in maya, but c4d's animation layers are stupidly broken to the point of being useless.
If you really have to I guess you could manually delete the problem keyframes, but that's going to take a long fucking time and probably not even look too good in the end.

You could also try cleaning it up in AE before importing into c4d. That might actually be your best bet.
Try adding a smooth expression to the position/rotation transforms in AE.

thanks dude!!!

even unreal gives better results m8. And at 60fps lmao

>>559951

This is going to be implemented into a future release of Blender, but for now, you have to download it seperately.

It's a realtime PBR engine for Blender that has been in the works for awhile. Details here:

http://www.cgmasters.net/free-tutorials/realtime-pbr-in-blender/

Goodluck OP, hope this helps.

>>559957
looks like shit