Archived threads in /3/ - 3DCG - 34. page

>>565709
uh no
implying they are bad

>>565709
i encourage and pleading you monster to stop because you will be leading to the life of endless degeneracy as you're literally feeding those innocent autismos with more cancer.

learn how to sell products that offer value

It's a deep program, I guess it depends on how many facets of it you want to learn. Having experience and a programming background will definitely come in handy (specifically for VEX stuff).

>>567126
You'll like how intuitive it is with a programming background. If it's your first 3D program it's good to learn and get good with. If you use something else and are actually intermediate with it then don't bother.

>>567131

Its not, I use C4D. I'm pretty much pushing C4D's limits it seems, C4Ds native 'coding' suite xpresso was surprisingly nice at first but its actually pretty shallow... or at least very inefficient at simple tasks.

I'm really frustrated with how little control I have over things like cloth or soft bodies in C4D.
I painstakingly made an xpresso in an attempt to make cloth work how I want, but in the end I couldn't. It also seems to only utilise 1/4th of my CPU in calculations.

It made me think that learning Houdini might be a good idea, just based on the fact it uses some kind of actual programming language as a core rather than an extra thing no one cares about as well as being better fitted towards simulation(?).

>>566938
he was made with blender

His problem was:

"Hey lets make an animation!"
"Cool! About what?"
"Dunno lol"

>>566950
No he wasn't

File: 1490477340948.gif (370KB, 206x176px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 206x176px

God dammit OP, you just flooded back all the memories of me watching those obscure fucking animations from random people all around the world

I hand-paint 100% of my textures but obviously that depends on how much time you have and what style you're going for.

In my case its usually helpful to hand-paint foliage because I can exaggerate detail in a way you don't get in a photorealistic style that reads better as leaves.

i don't think making your own leaf is possible.
its just one of those things

>>567413
what do you mean? i've seen handpainted leaves and they look quite good in games

>>566675
As far a weeb shit goes it's fairly good, animation is nice and fluid, clothing looks natural, it does clip a lot but that's fairly hard fix and isn't glaringly obvious. Lighting on the charter looks too bight in some of the shots. the backgrounds are a little strange, you've got this anime character, but then you got a real life background its very apparent when there are people in the background moving making it blend quite badly. anti-aliasing is not the best, all the edges are quite jagged.

overall I give it a 7/10, good job. any proof that you made it?

>>566679
You probably don't understand this hu?

>>566675
>>566679

Translation:

VERY OTAKU DESU, BUT GOOD JOB YES. CLOTHES LOOK GOOD DESU BUT CLIP YES. LIGHT TOO BRIGHT SOMETIMES DESU. ANIME GIRL NO WORK WITH REALISTIC BACKGROUNDS DESU. TOO SHARP DESU.
I GIVE 7/10 DESU. YOU REALLY MAKE DESU?

>>566824
I'd really like to get Ryzen TR once it's out. The level of scalability it has is just too good to pass up, it's the kind of shit you used to had to spend upwards of $10,000 on a workstation to get.

Whatever's better at the current time? I got an Intel currently because i bought the CPU in 2014. If i were getting one now i'd go for AMD

>>566824

I am using an i7-7700k / 32GB / 8GB p4000 quadro / 2TB SSD.

I previously used an i7-6700 none k / 16GB / RX 470 4GB / 1 TB SSD

Both Windows 10 pro.

I saw very little improvement from the intel i7-6700 to 7700k.

I'm waiting for that new dell all in one that comes with a Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3ghz max 3.7GHz with 32GB DDR 4 / RX 580 to come.

Gonna update to windows 10 pro ( As I hate homes limitations. )

Basically. I don't know if I can trust Ryzen for work, I will find out.

As for all-in-one. For the first time ( outside of overpriced pos like origic pc omen all-in-one [ which is not a true all-in-one ] ) No one has made a quality high end all-in-one till now.

And the way I figured. Its finally overkill for all my needs except for 3D modeling work.

I just hope the Ryzen 7 1700 and RX 580 actually deliver in 3D programs and some heavy gaming I do on my current pcs. When not doing 3D stuff.

Can update how it works on 3D, as I post here sometimes.

That looks like nothing fucking special at all, congrats OP

>>566995
>has the basic feature of any software with sculpting capabilities from 10 years ago
wooow

Yes, I-i'd like to report bullying ;_;

Yeah, you just need to apply a tiny bit of MassFX.
It's really not hard. Here's the outline, you're gonna have to fill in the blanks yourself.

1: set up container as 'static rigid body' make sure mesh type is set to concave.

2. Set ball object as 'dynamic rigid body'. Instance the ball as many times as you want once you've done this. Just gave them instanced, floating in air above the container.

3. In your MassFX toolbar hit 'play simulation without animation.'

4. Stand back in wonder as the balls fall down into the container and fill the space realistically.

5. Capture transforms. Select all, convert to edit poly.

6. Profit.

>>567205
Haven't watched the video - but I'm guessing this will cover your needs:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qGLPtGbOKgw

>>567205
>>567206
Sorry for the late response. Thanks for this.
I had heard this method before, though figured there'd be an easier way than that but this is a way nonetheless.
i'll give it a go. thanks senpai.

Help me!

No, help me!!

File: 2o1cuawm.png (29KB, 741x568px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 741x568px

Hello. What do you want help in?

>>565046
Are they PBR?

>>567029
Could always convert them and use them as bases.
>>565046
Thanks OP.

>>565046
also this https://gumroad.com/joost some free

A shill who hasn't even tried the snake oil he's trying to sell? SHIIIIIET

>>566929
Creepiest thing I've ever seen in years

>f-clone
>faceshift-clone
Only difference being, this looks like ass. Not that faceshift looks all that good, but it manages to look better than this using only a Kinect for 360.

>>565475
The one you posted is fine, I use it. Don't worry about splitting hairs; at that price point they're all gonna be similar, but Wacom is usually solid.

>>565477
I agree with you, i have seen the good reputation of Wacom,but the problem is that i'm buying a refurbished one, so 60 $ for that model refurbished is okay or should i use it on another brand?

>>565478
have you considered getting a job before getting more tech that will likely gather dust, poorfag?

you create models and use only vertex colors and standard smooth shading with point lights

the reason it looks terrible and shitty is because of mipmapping,resolution and the fact that's usually a sprite and not a model

File: bowser.jpg (20KB, 319x362px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 319x362px

>>565368
You lump basic polygon primitives on top of each other to form characters and don't use modern skinning techniques to rig, you just parent shit on top of each other.

>>565368
You just do it.

>>565063
Oh look its another animation thread from someone who obviously didnt learn the basic rules of animation.
Get the survival guide and fuck off

>>565063
looks ok for your very first animation
but you can add much more detail,
you can clearly se that it is robotic

>>565063

It's clearly a "first animation" with a lot of problems, making it look robotic. No smooth arc trajectories, identically mirrored poses for all blocks, low framerate, totally stiff foot bones, no followthrough (inertial forces) on the arms, hard curves on the pelvis that make it look like a hammering motion, feet touch the ground only in the very mid frame instead of infront or behind the pelvis so it looks like he's stomping in one place rather than walking, the list goes on...

Don't let that discourage you though, it's a first animation after all.

Mirror modifier

>>566968
You could also use the Symmetrize thing, Edit mode -> Mesh -> Symmetrize