Archived threads in /3/ - 3DCG - 25. page

>>570447

Fuck sake Modo got blacked.

>>570467
cool explanation bro!!! many thanks to your mom

>>570447

I come from blender , and i really like it, the interface doesn't feel that bland and has many useful things

>>567256
You could make that for 3000~

>>567257

Yup, you can easily beat that price with a self-build..... right up until you try to add the 5k display.
Granted... a 5k display is really not necessary, so, you could argue that it is still 'overpriced' because you're dropping a big chunk of your money on a luxury that you don't really need...

BUT...

If you have decided you definitely want a really, really nice UHD display with your next PC - you actually can't beat this price. You'd actually be paying *more* money to go through the hassle of building a machine yourself, which can only run Windows, makes 10 times more noise, loses it's resale value instantly, and doesn't look half as good.

But yeah - that's only if you're really set on having a very nice display. (And the display on this thing is really, really nice).

If not... yep; self-build. Save a couple grand.

The more I think about it... the more it's clear that if you're dead set on having a high-end display for your next computer, you'd actually be an idiot to overlook this machine.
You can cry all you like about 'Macfags' and hipsters and blah blah blah... at the end of the day, this is a powerful PC which runs Windows and MacOS* at a price that, given the cost of that display, isn't half bad.

*btw - once you've installed Windows, you can actually erase the MacOS partition entirely if you're that anti-Mac.

>>570674
minimalism has turned into an excuse for bad shit, learn to do shit and post or say you're not that good and learning, don't blame minimalism for bullshit

File: Jellyfish-Tutorial-3D-CGI-by-Víctor-Navarro1.jpg (152KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 600x338px

>>570675
Fair enough, i agree that the overwhelming rise of "minimalist" styles is a result of people not wanting to put much effort into their work, but the point of my post, albeit inexplicit, was to find advice to better this and future projects.
I like making minimalist stuff because I don't have the patience or skill to work on more detailed projects, not because i want to pretend my work is professional without putting any effort into it.
I wouldn't pretend that my jellos are better than the jellos in pic related.

>>570678
my best advice would be to learn composition and design, color balance and contrasts. also i wouldn't use hairs for tentacles, model them they look better

You have to change

>>570778
You have to change

>>570778
You have to change

>what should the final product look like

a human face

>how many polygons must the model contain

why are you asking that here

>how do I turn on selection symmetry

go to modeling toolkit and under symmetry select object x

>>569843
Just use ZBrush to do 90% of the work, also when people say 'realistic' they actually mean 'believable', avoid the uncanny valley at all costs.

You should at least google what photorealism is. Its not 'realism'. Its about mostly rendering and looking like on photos. If your teacher specifically asked for photorealism, render him and black and white render and rub it in his uneducated face.

On yout modeling package, in the toolbar, you press the "set on fire button" and then the "render" button. That's it.

File: 1490503219287m.jpg (65KB, 861x1024px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 861x1024px

>>568581
*Correction
Blender is pretty much the only decent *free* 3D rendering program, right?

File: 1490500163435m.jpg (63KB, 918x1024px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 918x1024px

>>568582
Is it truly that simple? I've tried rendering in blender once, but realized that you need to take multiple aspects into account.

Something like this Anon?

https://www.3dartistonline.com/news/2011/04/mind-bending-animation-the-swedish-way/

no its actually the only bug-free software on the planet

>>569516
i mean far as using it to support a gpu.
you can get error if your card is not fully supported

>>569517
so target the features the card has dipshit

>>568486
Simple, it's subscription-based. It's only free for a good 30 days unless you're good at cracking programs.

there are a few things you don't consider here

first of all, you have to ask permission to move your license from one computer to another.
secondly you can't sell your work online, and in places like turbosquid you get asked to post .max or .3ds files.
third, you have 100k poly export limitation. (or it is just in maya lt?)

>>570075

You forgot something

>Using autodesk subscription products is the same as selling your soul to the devil.

0/10

>>570187
>It seems I cannot share sketchfab link here (woot!1?)
newfag, lurk more

>>570219
>>570238
Well, ok.

what is it?

File: error.png (54KB, 711x277px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 711x277px

Some alternative for Cycles

Can't buy Vray for Blender yet so I'm trying this out.

Using the unstable build btw and got this

>installed official build
>still get the same error

>>570546
disunity.
google it.

>>570609
thanks anon, i knew i could count on you!

looks half assed

>>570029
>ayy lmao ?

For your first ZBrush thing I'd say it looks good. Carry on, son.

She looks like she just took a dive in a dumpster and some random pieces of trash stuck to her body.

Does nobody here PBR? come on guys... i need some help here. I don't want to learn both programs.

>>569268
Both of them are good. I would go with quixel since you are already used to photoshop workflow.

Personally I like substance more; but in my opinion no one should get with painter only, designer is a must too if you want to do something decent with substance

>>570389
>is this a meme?
cinema 4d is only good for motion graphics, for 3d animation go to maya, for modeling you need combination of many 3d tools
>normal pipeline
>box model base on maya
>go to zbrush to sculpt model
>return to maya and retopo
>texture in substance designer
>return to maya and make bones
>make animation
>render in arnold
>or send to unreal, make scene then compile

>>570391
That is a lot of software and a lot of different programs, seems like a professional workflow. For now what would you say is the best 3d animator/modeler to begin with.

>>570393
Maya is industry standard
>>570393
>That is a lot of software and a lot of different programs
some programs are good with somethings and some aren't, cinema 4d is abysmal with uvs, also super slow compared to others