Archived threads in /3/ - 3DCG - 113. page

If it pays.... lol

>>537646
At least they're doing something you fucking crybaby. That's your competition and what are you doing but bitching. Show us what you've done.

File: 1452197754898.jpg (55KB, 410x380px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 410x380px

>>537646
>Moderne Kunst

>>533530
this is fucking awesome !!!
I'm new in 3d and I liked quixel very very much, are other texturing softwares equally good?

>>533531
Quixel / Allegorithimic Subtance / Photoshop > all

>>533530
Is megascans the way of the future?

Money

>>532107

https://www.yobi3d.com

File: ZYGvphL[1].jpg (121KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 900x900px

Print the hentai goddesss Mamiya Marie.

dunno where you would find the model though

File: 1361501315376.jpg (30KB, 360x259px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 360x259px

>>537374
>3dsmax
theyre gonna scrap that shit better start using another program, kidd

File: 1425954784562.jpg (7KB, 215x211px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 215x211px

>>537380
>theyre gonna scrap that shit
what a fag

do you have "select and link" on in the top bar?

>>535341

Autism2

>>535351

Alright you little faggot, that's not helpful feedback, but I'll take it as feedback anyways. Yes, it's an autistic fucking model. I quite literally traced the head from one of Chris's drawings, AND I did the proportions of the body to closely match the proportions most frequently drawn of Sonichu. I realize that it makes the character look like a flabby middle-aged man in a fursuit, but isn't that what we love about Sonichu?

So thanks for the feedback, but what I really want to know is how I can exploit the autistic masses with animations of this shit.

Thank you for your time little fuckturd shitfuck.

>>535352

You seem to be labouring under the impression that anyone cares about Sonichu.

File: 1348876529462.gif (120KB, 497x372px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 497x372px

>>537398
why do you think, fuckoloid? maybe because it was the90's

>>537398
>those sandals

just think about it. 3dcg was in the early stages especially for games. just adding bumps or details wouldnt work on those low poly assets. to not make it look so bland they choose noise for better recognition and more detail. also yes. its kind of a style question too.

>>536529
>but I'm not getting it and idk why

Uh because your shit doesn't look real. To elaborate: none of what you modeled has the complexity (or the semblance of complexity) of the real life things you're attempting to simulate.

Trees don't look like that, rocks don't look like that, grass doesn't look like that, light doesn't work that way, etc.

You don't have normal maps, your grass all rook same (needs randomized orientation, different clump types and sizes, different colors, different blade sizes, realistic looking lighting), same with all the rocks and stones, the tree trunks have no texture, the leaves on the two trees are clearly image planes, etc

I mean watch this video for Blender (or go find one for Max or Maya or whatever, there's a really good one for the CryEngine using Maya):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gF6qkByl-_M

Or to go even further (again, with Blender):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eshOzshjt90

>but I don't use Blender
The concepts are universal

the lighting is very flat. also dont use shaders from the software.

>>536576
Great tutorials! My computer is overclocking just by watching them, but the results look great

File: 1420427640947.jpg (13KB, 196x178px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 196x178px

>>537272
>what is viewport shading

>>537276
tried it, couldn't find anything that looked normal. I don't think the shadows are supposed to be this intense.

It's because the mesh has a sharp edge bu the normals along that edge are smoothed, and you have very few faces so the normal shading is averaging over the entirety of the face adjacent to the smoothed edge.
Or at least that's usually the case with this type of shading.

File: 1473148170446.jpg (24KB, 400x270px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x270px

10,000 hour rule
if you have 6 years to flounder then try everything at least once.
once you know what's what then pick something you find fun because youll be doing it every day.
the only think that will get you into the industry easily is if you take that skill you made with 10000 rule and turn it into an art.
or just know someone because in this industry you'll be working contract to contract so making reputable connections is a must if you aren't the best
>stable
oh, go work at Walmart because it's go big or go home

Unless you're ridiculously good in 3d animation, I'd recommend spending the next 6 years just building your portfolio.
Animation is more about what you can do, vs what you know.
People are going to want to see your portfolio+demo reel over everything else. Your degree is just icing on the cake.
Getting a CS degree will help with scripts/game dev/whatever if you want, but that's really up to you.

Also, if you wanted a stable job, you picked one of the worst industries for it.

>>537399
Thanks for the tips

>>532952
If you're an animator you practice day and night to get as good as your gif and then some. You learn, practice, learn practice.

I have nothing to say for artists as that is different from my work. But practice for both.

>>532952
if you are 3d animator I'd reallyy recomend looking into Street Fighter IV and V character animations and how they move, I have never seen such detail in animations almost in any game. just slow down videos and look how characters move, every one of them has theyr own characteristics etc, I really don't know why people are not using that game as refrence to character animation

>>532952
If you made this animation from GIF and you know how to export it in FBX to unity/unreal, you'll be fine, actually drop some contact info, i might have work for you.

Shitty topology. Booleans will always do that.

>>536600
So the ONLY solution is doing a retopo?
Can't blender calculate something smooth and okay looking at least

>>536601
yes for first question
no for second question

>>536012
>So what does it take
A good portfolio.

Something you're likely to never get by browsing /3/

be 100% competent in zbrush and max, have a banging portfolio

>>536016
>film industry
>max
you mean Maya

model something that is on your level of skill

and if you have a question, post it. you may not know if there is a faster/better way of modeling what you want to do

>>536897
what this anon said.

You can't expect to model really realistic stuff outright if you're just starting, if that were the case anyone could do a couple of months of modelling classes and join the AAA industry, start small, make mistakes, that's how you learn anything. You'll get there eventually

>>536895
Start of with easy stuff. How long have you modelled? If you are new don't make a complicated weapon, start by doing simple stuff

Also smoke pot

>"WHY CANT I MODEL LIKE PIXAR AFTER ONE WEEK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

>>536051
:/

i like your OC, it's good!

holy shit

the light in the back is to be offset a little so it shows up on the rim of the subject, rather than directly behind

the light on the rim adds an outline to the contour

guy i knew from /p/ uses it a lot in his nude photography https://www.instagram.com/michaelrodriguezphoto/

that link is nsfw btw

>>537114
This. Or, if the light is directly behind the subject, it can give a kick of light to the hair.

File: 008.jpg (15KB, 600x402px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 600x402px

>>537113
It's kinda silly imo too and I was never a huge fan of it but just think of it the way it's called as "rim lighting". You set up your light sources so that the falloff illuminates the edges of your object/subject. It's supposed to give more definition, making it easier to focus on.

Not sure who out there is having so much trouble focusing of what is dead-on front and center but whatever.