Aurora borealis paranormal?

....i absolutely refuse to believe the school system has failed you this badly.

>>17252542
This. And, apart from this, no.

>>17252542
such a tryhard fucking post. it's /x/. the guy's thinking laterally. it's an interesting way of putting it and i like the way he's put it. it suits the board. this isn't /sci/. lighten up or fuck off. idiot.

>>17252652
What? You're as dumb as him

No of course it's not paranormal Jesus Christ

>>17252674
look, everyone, the sole arbiter of what is and isn't paranormal in this universe has arrived and he'll suck your cock for cab fare home. get lost, you fucking mosquito.

>>17252652
I actually have to agree with this. Perhaps it eschews science in favor of the poetic, but at least the concept has some grounding. It's certainly streets ahead of crap like, "I saw a number AGIN WHAT IT MEAN?!" or, "What if the bad guy's...THE GOOD GUY?"

>>17252714
that's what the board's for after all. artificially lit forests and planetary auras. and why not. fucking hate tryhard miseries like that.