Are snuff films real?

>>17246752
yes except they are banned or on the deep web. And illegal to watch for some reason.

No. There isn't a single case of a murder being filmed specifically to be distributed for profit and considering the severity of such crimes, there would certainly be court records.

The closest instances I can mention off the top of my head are
>Daisy's Destruction
(Girl not actually killed, just heinously abused)
>Luke Magnotta
(Distributed video of murder in hopes of becoming a fetish porn star)

Other cases where people have recorded their commission of brutal murder are rare and nearly always for their personal use. Lately, people have distributed recordings of them murdering others but it's generally in an act of passion and they expect to die soon after.

>>17246816
>Daisy's Destruction
That one exists? I thought it was another grifter

>>17246848
the meme version discussed on 4chan is basically grifter tier but it's based in truth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rir03PwsrU4

>>17246848
It was an ausfag. Go figure.

>>17246816
>hasn't been on the dark web

>>17246860
It's also interesting to note for anyone not trying to sit through a 60 minute video that bodies of young girls were recovered from this dude's previous residence, where his studio was located so it's very likely that he did kill some of his victims but no video of those killings was ever distributed so if he did record them he either did it for his own use or (more likely lmho) he accidentally killed them by taking his torture porn too far then destroyed those videos.

I suspect he thought Malaysian(?) law would protect him from prosecution for the production of child torture porn due to some arrogant misunderstanding of their legal process or possibly he expected to bribe his way to safety. The fact that he operated as long as he did suggests some negligence on the part of local law enforcement

>>17246816
There's the Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs who wanted to sell their video too. (Also known colloquially as 3 guys 1 hammer).

>>17246862
Of course I have, but I'm confident any authentic video found there was not produced for profit and any professionally produced video found there does not contain actual murder.

>>17246889
Yes there are. How do you explain No Limits Fun then?

>>17246884
Oh yeah those guys slipped my mind and you're right they were trying to shop it around. I put them in basically the same category as Magnotta though, i.e. pursuit of celebrity

>>17246898
Easily. It's made up based on rumors of Daisy's Destruction

All the videos of terrorists executions are technically snuff movies, but if you think to stuff like Flower of Flesh and Blood or August Underground Mordum then not, they're only urban legends, even some discussed videos like the Meiwes or the Magnotta ones aren't snuffs because they brutalize corpses, and the death on those people isn't shown.
But if you consider as snuff movies the suicide videos too, so, like the terrorists executions video, there many of them.

>>17247151
Yeah but terrorist or el cartel execution videos aren't commercialized as far as I know, they just end on liveleak.

http://www.sott.net/article/244380-Beyond-the-Dutroux-Affair-The-reality-of-protected-child-abuse-and-snuff-networks-in-a-world-ruled-by-psychopaths

Here's your answer, OP.